Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “LIMA v. United States”
Garcia-Lima v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Reymundo-Lima v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
Lima v. United Statespublic domain
886 F.2d 1323 Limav.U.S.* NO. 88-5869 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. AUG 28, 1989 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. 2
United States v. Yuniel Lima-Riveropublic domain
Case: 19-10759 Document: 00515536662 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 19-10759
Lima v. United Statespublic domain
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER SHERMAN G. FINESILVER, District Judge. This case1 brings into sharp focus various medical viewpoints and theories as to the causation and etiology of Guillain-Barre syndrome (“GBS”),2 a neurologic disorder. Specifically, it involves the question whether the swine flu vaccine caused plaintiff, Joseph Li
Joseph E. Lima v. United Statespublic domain
PER CURIAM. These are appeals arising out of litigation involving the National Swine Flu Immunization Program of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 247b(j)(l) (1976) (“Swine Flu Act”). Plaintiff, Joseph Lima, received a swine flu vaccination on November 12, 1976, during the implementation of the swine flu program sponsored by the United States. Appro
United States v. Limapublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Freddy Lima appeals his jury conviction for possession with intent to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and conspiracy to possess heroin with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. The evidence in this case was insufficient for any rational jury to arrive at a guilty verdict; therefore, we reverse both counts. The government failed to show th
Lima v. Lynchpublic domain
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Moisés Enrique Lima (“Lima”) petitioned this court for review of a final removal order entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). 'As Lima’s challenge to the underlying discretionary denial of relief under Section 203 of the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (“NACARA”), Pub. L. No. 105-100, §§ 201-204, 111 Stat. 2160, 2193-
United States v. Paredes-Limapublic domain
493 F.Supp.2d 958 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jorge PAREDES-LIMA, et al., Defendants. No. 3:04cr086 (1-7). United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. August 22, 2005. *959 *960 John Hayes Rion, Jon Paul Rion, Rion Rion and Rion LPA Inc., Nicholas George Gouna
De Lima v. Sessionspublic domain
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I agree with the majority that De Lima’s overbreadth theory is unavailing insofar as he argues that the term “theft *271offense” under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G), does not include temporary deprivations of property or theft of services. I disagree, however, that we lack
Hernandez Lima v. Lynchpublic domain
LYNCH, Circuit Judge Ronaldo Hernandez-Lima petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision to dismiss his appeal of an immigration judge’s (“Í J”) denial of his application for withholding of removal. Hernandez-Lima argued that he suffered past persecution and faced a clear probability of future persecution in Guatemala through threats, violence, and
United States v. William Limapublic domain
135 F.3d 767 U.S.v.William Lima NO. 97-5027 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Dec 04, 1997 Appeal From: D.N.J. ,No.95cr00280 , Brown, J. 1 Affirmed.
Malcolm v. Honeoye Falls-Lima Educ. Ass'npublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Bowersock v. City of Limapublic domain
566 U. S. 1035; 566 U. S. 927; 566 U. S. 994; 567 U. S. 929; 567 U. S. 910; and 567 U. S. 940. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Malcolm v. Honeoye Falls-Lima Cent. Sch. Dist.public domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department denied.
Bowersock v. City of Limapublic domain
Ct. App. Ohio, Allen County. Certiorari denied.
Lima v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.public domain
*1095ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION. Before this court are motions to dismiss in two cases that, while not consolidated, raise nearly identical issues. This court therefore considers the motions together, in the interest of efficiency. The first
Malcolm v. Honeoye Falls-Lima Cent. Sch. Dist.public domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Lima Delta Co. v. Global Aerospace, Inc.public domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.
Lima Delta Co. v. Global Aerospace, Inc.public domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied.