⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “LINDSAY v. United States”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021-07-09 · Published · cited 13× · 4 F.4th 292
Case: 20-50994 Document: 00515932476 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/09/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 9, 2021
Supreme Court of the United States · 2020-03-02 · Published · cited 0× · 140 S. Ct. 1288; 206 L. Ed. 2d 268
Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-10-07 · Published · cited 0× · 140 S. Ct. 155; 205 L. Ed. 2d 55
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-02-26 · Published · cited 0× · 531 U.S. 1203; 121 S. Ct. 1216
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1999-11-01 · Published · cited 0× · 528 U.S. 981; 120 S. Ct. 438
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States Court of Federal Claims · 1998-06-25 · Published · cited 0× · 41 Fed. Cl. 388; 42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,326; 1998 U.S. Claims LEXIS 129; 1998 WL 338180
OPINION AND ORDER HODGES, Judge. Plaintiff Doreen Lindsay seeks additional compensation from her mail transportation and delivery contract. The solicitation for the contract misstated the total number of mailboxes to which mail delivery was required, resulting in her allegedly not being paid adequately for work performed. Plaintiff claims that the contract provides an upward adjustment in compensation in
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002-06-27 · Published · cited 441× · 295 F.3d 1252; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 12725
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. Daniel Lindsay appeals the decision of the Court of Federal Claims dismissing his challenge to actions by the United States Air Force that led to his involuntary separation from service; namely, particular Officer Evaluation Reports prepared in 1986, his subsequent nonselections for promotion to Major and Lieutenant Colonel, and the refusal of the Air F
Supreme Court of the United States · 1993-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 510 U.S. 832
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1993-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 510 U.S. 832; 114 S. Ct. 103
510 U.S. 832 Lindsayv.United States. No. 92-8626. Supreme Court of United States. October 4, 1993. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 2d Cir. 2 Certiorari denied. Reported below: 985 F. 2d 66
Supreme Court of the United States · 1991-03-18 · Published · cited 0× · 499 U.S. 930; 111 S. Ct. 1334
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1991-03-18 · Published · cited 0× · 499 U.S. 930
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019-07-23 · Published · cited 25× · 931 F.3d 852
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 16-10349 Plaintiff-Appellee/ 16-10384 Cross-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:12-cr-00873- CRB-1 MICHAEL LINDSAY, Defendant-Appellant/
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987-02-11 · Published · cited 15× · 520 A.2d 1059; 1987 D.C. App. LEXIS 310
520 A.2d 1059 (1987) Steve LINDSAY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 84-1027. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Submitted October 23, 1986. Decided February 11, 1987. *1060 Sandra J. Boek, Arlington, Va., appointed by this court, was on brief, for appellant. Joseph E. diGenova, U.S. Atty., M
Supreme Court of the United States · 1985-02-19 · Published · cited 0× · 469 U.S. 1214; 105 S. Ct. 1187; 53 U.S.L.W. 3598; 84 L. Ed. 2d 334; 1985 U.S. LEXIS 934
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010-04-16 · Published · cited 0× · 371 F. App'x 691
ORDER David Lindsay pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute in excess of 500 grams of methamphetamine and possessing with intent to distribute at least 5 grams of methamphetamine, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, and was sentenced to 204 months’ imprisonment. In the plea agreement he waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. He filed a notice of appeal, but his appointed counsel now seeks to withdraw under
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010-04-16 · Published · cited 0× · 371 F. App'x 691
ORDER David Lindsay pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute in excess of 500 grams of methamphetamine and possessing with intent to distribute at least 5 grams of methamphetamine, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, and was sentenced to 204 months’ imprisonment. In the plea agreement he waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. He filed a notice of appeal, but his appointed counsel now seeks to withdraw under
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009-08-03 · Published · cited 0× · 339 F. App'x 268
OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. William Lindsay, Jr. appeals his conviction by jury for mailing a threatening communication in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 876 and making false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. He argues the District Court abused its discretion in admitting prior bad acts evidence in violation of Federal Rules of Evidence 404(b) and 403, and that it erred in interpreting
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009-08-03 · Published · cited 0× · 339 F. App'x 268
OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. William Lindsay, Jr. appeals his conviction by jury for mailing a threatening communication in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 876 and making false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. He argues the District Court abused its discretion in admitting prior bad acts evidence in violation of Federal Rules of Evidence 404(b) and 403, and that it erred in interpreting
Black v. Lindsaypublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-04-29 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 1650
Petition for rehearing denied.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2008-08-25 · Published · cited 15× · 572 F. Supp. 2d 144; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64896; 2008 WL 3911039
(2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Kofi Apea ORLEANS-LINDSAY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 02-2528(CKK). Criminal Action No. 00-440(CKK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 25, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. Currently pending before the Court is Defendant Kofi Apea Orleans-Lindsay's Mo