⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “LORETTA COATS”

Missouri Court of Appeals · 2021-03-16 · Published · cited 0×
WARREN COATS, Trustee, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) v. ) No. SD36788 ) ELVIN LEON MUSTION and ) Filed: March 16, 2021 LORETTA JEAN MUSTION, his ) wife, Co-Trustees, )
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1997-10-21 · Published · cited 15× · 214 B.R. 397; 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 1711; 1997 WL 675180
214 B.R. 397 (1997) In re Carla Rae COATS, SS # XXX-XX-XXXX, Debtor. Carla Rae COATS, Plaintiff, v. NEW JERSEY HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AUTHORITY, Nebraska Student Loan Program, Inc., Oklahoma Regents for Higher Education, Winham Prof., Nebraska Student Loan Nationwide Credit, and, U.S. Department of Education, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 96-03785-M, Adversary No. 97-0008-M. United States Bankrup
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2009-03-02 · Published · cited 543× · 202 P.3d 564; 2009 Colo. LEXIS 220; 2009 WL 541605
202 P.3d 564 (2009) Mark A. CORNELIUS, Applicant-Appellant v. RIVER RIDGE RANCH LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION; Rio Cucharas Phase 3 Homeowners Association; Maria Lake Grazing Association; Dick Wolfe, State Engineer; Steve Witte, Division Engineer for Water Division 2; Huerfano County Commissioners; Huerfano County Water Conservancy District; Pat McConnell; Angela Treece; Talbert R. Mead, Jr.; Richard I. George; Loretta Charlifue; and Maria Martinez, Opp
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004-01-26 · Published · cited 61× · 83 P.3d 648; 2004 Colo. LEXIS 49; 2004 WL 111652
Justice RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. I. Introduction In 1994, the voters of Colorado enacted a constitutional amendment which imposed a two-term limit1 on any “nonjudicial elected official of any county, city and county, city, town, school district, service authority, or any other political subdivision of the State of Colorado.” Colo. Const, art. XV
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco) · 2004-11-03 · Published · cited 0×
Builders Transport v. Grice Smith, et al IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-01-00130-CV </
Lobato v. Taylorpublic domain
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002-06-24 · Published · cited 107× · 71 P.3d 938; 2002 Colo. LEXIS 527; 2002 WL 1360432
71 P.3d 938 (2002) Eugene LOBATO; Zack Bernal; Gabrielita Adeline Espinosa; Edward Espinosa; Pete E. Espinosa, Jr.; Corpus Gallegos, by and through his conservator Yvette Gallegos; Gloria Gallegos; Rupert Gallegos; Raymond Garcia; Charlie Jacquez, Jr.; Adolph J. Lobato; Bonifacio "Bonnie" Lobato, by and through his Conservator Teresa Lobato; Carlos Lobato; Emilio Lobato, Jr.; Jose F. Lobato; Presesentacion J. Lobato; Gloria Maestas; Norman Maestas; Rober
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco) · 2005-03-09 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS </
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975-09-15 · Published · cited 24× · 521 F.2d 1381; 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 12768
OPINION *1382 PER CURIAM: Appellant was convicted on February 24, 1975, of attempting to introduce 30 valium tablets concealed in a vaseline coated balloon (i. e., one suitably prepared for body cavity concealm
Clark v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Alaska · 2009-01-16 · Published · cited 6× · 199 P.3d 1203; 2009 Alas. App. LEXIS 8; 2009 WL 103711
COATS, Chief Judge, dissenting. Travis Clark was convicted of assaulting his girlfriend, Loretta Amouak. Amouak's statements to hospital staff that her injuries resulted from an assault by her boyfriend were a key part of the State's evidence against Clark. According to Amouak's friend, Kimberly Yadon, Amouak borrowed Clark's truck without his permission on the night of the assault, after sh
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019-05-08 · Published · cited 3× · 2019 Ohio 1741
[Cite as MTGLQ Investors, L.P. v. Wagner, 2019-Ohio-1741.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) MTGLQ INVESTORS, L.P. C.A. No. 29079 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN TH
Zedonis v. Lynchpublic domain
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017-02-08 · Published · cited 38× · 233 F. Supp. 3d 417; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17417; 2017 WL 511234
MEMORANDUM William W. Caldwell, United States District Judge I. Introduction Before this court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 8) Plaintiff Eric Zedonis’s complaint (Doc. 1), which asserts an as-applied challenge to the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Plaintiff alleges that, due to a p
Kilmer v. Fosterpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019-02-21 · Published · cited 0× · 927 N.W.2d 163; 2019 WI App 15; 386 Wis. 2d 352
PER CURIAM. ¶1 Kira Foster, a/k/a Kira Hoff, appeals an order compelling specific performance of a land contract. We conclude that Foster has failed to develop any sufficient arguments or to provide an adequate record showing that she is entitled to relief. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In a land contract signed by both parties, Bruce Kilmer offered to purchase from Foster "Tax I
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2004-06-17 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued June 17, 2004 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ____________ NO.
Goodwin v. Duncanpublic domain
District Court, W.D. New York · 2009-11-05 · Published · cited 0× · 668 F. Supp. 2d 509; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102956; 2009 WL 3719194
668 F.Supp.2d 509 (2009) Joshua GOODWIN, Petitioner, v. George DUNCAN, Superintendent, Respondent. No. 03-CV-031A. United States District Court, W.D. New York. November 5, 2009. *511 Joshua Goodwin, Pine City, NY, pro se. Loretta S. Courtney, Monroe County District Attorney's Office, Rochester, NY, for Respondent. <
Larkin v. Duncanpublic domain
District Court, W.D. New York · 2005-02-17 · Published · cited 0× · 378 F. Supp. 2d 188; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18842; 2005 WL 1672000
378 F.Supp.2d 188 (2005) Rayfield LARKIN, Petitioner, v. George DUNCAN, Superintendent, Respondent. No. 02-CV-6455. United States District Court, W.D. New York. February 17, 2005. *189 *190 Rayfield Larkin, Moravia, NY, pro se. Loretta S. Courtney, Monroe County District Attorney's Offi
District Court, W.D. New York · 2006-07-14 · Published · cited 3× · 438 F. Supp. 2d 185; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47993; 2006 WL 1971679
438 F.Supp.2d 185 (2006) Robert McCULLOUGH, Petitioner, v. Floyd BENNETT, Jr., Respondent. No. 03-CV-0085(VEB). United States District Court, W.D. New York. July 14, 2006. *186 Robert McCullough, Elmira, NY, Pro se. Loretta S. Courtney, Rochester, NY, for Respondent. DECISION AND ORDER BIANCHINI, Un
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007-11-07 · Published · cited 1× · 70 Mass. App. Ct. 667; 875 N.E.2d 870; 2007 Mass. App. LEXIS 1190
Cypher, J. The defendant, Eden Judy Asmeron, was convicted by a Superior Court jury in February, 2005, of deriving support from the proceeds of prostitution committed by a minor, G. L. *668c. 272, § 4B.1 Subsequently, acting on the defendant’s posttrial motion under Mass.R.Crim.P. 25(b)(2), 378 Mass. 896 (1979), the trial judge denied her moti
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012-07-16 · Published · cited 0× · 879 F. Supp. 2d 707; 2012 WL 2891191; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98273
*709 OPINION AND ORDER LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment [dkt. 36]. The parties have fully briefed the motion. The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the parties’ papers
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012-10-24 · Published · cited 17× · 463 Mass. 581; 977 N.E.2d 505; 2012 WL 5205688; 2012 Mass. LEXIS 982
Duffly, J. After a mistrial at which the jury were deadlocked, the defendant was retried and convicted of two indictments charging murder in the first degree on a theory of deliberate premeditation.1 On appeal, the defendant claims that his motion to dismiss the indictments, filed before retrial, should have been allowed because the Commonwealth had not presented legally sufficient evidence at his fir
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012-03-19 · Published · cited 1× · 860 F. Supp. 2d 432; 2012 WL 917814; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36259
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANTS JOHNNIE GOODMAN, SR. AND BRUCE GOODMAN, DENYING MOTION TO SEVER, DENYING DEFENDANT JOHNNIE GOODMAN, JR.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT LYNETTE HURT-HATTER’S COUNTERCLAIM OR FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.