Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “LORETTA COATS”
WARREN COATS, Trustee, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ELVIN LEON MUSTION and LORETTA JEAN MUSTION, his wife, Co-Trusteespublic domain
WARREN COATS, Trustee, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) v. ) No. SD36788 ) ELVIN LEON MUSTION and ) Filed: March 16, 2021 LORETTA JEAN MUSTION, his ) wife, Co-Trustees, )
214 B.R. 397 (1997) In re Carla Rae COATS, SS # XXX-XX-XXXX, Debtor. Carla Rae COATS, Plaintiff, v. NEW JERSEY HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AUTHORITY, Nebraska Student Loan Program, Inc., Oklahoma Regents for Higher Education, Winham Prof., Nebraska Student Loan Nationwide Credit, and, U.S. Department of Education, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 96-03785-M, Adversary No. 97-0008-M. United States Bankrup
Cornelius v. River Ridge Ranch Landowners Ass'npublic domain
202 P.3d 564 (2009) Mark A. CORNELIUS, Applicant-Appellant v. RIVER RIDGE RANCH LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION; Rio Cucharas Phase 3 Homeowners Association; Maria Lake Grazing Association; Dick Wolfe, State Engineer; Steve Witte, Division Engineer for Water Division 2; Huerfano County Commissioners; Huerfano County Water Conservancy District; Pat McConnell; Angela Treece; Talbert R. Mead, Jr.; Richard I. George; Loretta Charlifue; and Maria Martinez, Opp
Davidson v. Sandstrompublic domain
Justice RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. I. Introduction In 1994, the voters of Colorado enacted a constitutional amendment which imposed a two-term limit1 on any “nonjudicial elected official of any county, city and county, city, town, school district, service authority, or any other political subdivision of the State of Colorado.” Colo. Const, art. XV
Builders Transport v. Grice Smith, et al IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-01-00130-CV </
Lobato v. Taylorpublic domain
71 P.3d 938 (2002) Eugene LOBATO; Zack Bernal; Gabrielita Adeline Espinosa; Edward Espinosa; Pete E. Espinosa, Jr.; Corpus Gallegos, by and through his conservator Yvette Gallegos; Gloria Gallegos; Rupert Gallegos; Raymond Garcia; Charlie Jacquez, Jr.; Adolph J. Lobato; Bonifacio "Bonnie" Lobato, by and through his Conservator Teresa Lobato; Carlos Lobato; Emilio Lobato, Jr.; Jose F. Lobato; Presesentacion J. Lobato; Gloria Maestas; Norman Maestas; Rober
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS </
United States v. Loretta Mae Parkpublic domain
OPINION *1382 PER CURIAM: Appellant was convicted on February 24, 1975, of attempting to introduce 30 valium tablets concealed in a vaseline coated balloon (i. e., one suitably prepared for body cavity concealm
Clark v. Statepublic domain
COATS, Chief Judge, dissenting. Travis Clark was convicted of assaulting his girlfriend, Loretta Amouak. Amouak's statements to hospital staff that her injuries resulted from an assault by her boyfriend were a key part of the State's evidence against Clark. According to Amouak's friend, Kimberly Yadon, Amouak borrowed Clark's truck without his permission on the night of the assault, after sh
MTGLQ Investors, L.P. v. Wagnerpublic domain
[Cite as MTGLQ Investors, L.P. v. Wagner, 2019-Ohio-1741.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) MTGLQ INVESTORS, L.P. C.A. No. 29079 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN TH
Zedonis v. Lynchpublic domain
MEMORANDUM William W. Caldwell, United States District Judge I. Introduction Before this court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 8) Plaintiff Eric Zedonis’s complaint (Doc. 1), which asserts an as-applied challenge to the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Plaintiff alleges that, due to a p
Kilmer v. Fosterpublic domain
PER CURIAM. ¶1 Kira Foster, a/k/a Kira Hoff, appeals an order compelling specific performance of a land contract. We conclude that Foster has failed to develop any sufficient arguments or to provide an adequate record showing that she is entitled to relief. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In a land contract signed by both parties, Bruce Kilmer offered to purchase from Foster "Tax I
Koll Real Estate Group, Inc. v. Edward Carrpublic domain
Opinion issued June 17, 2004 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ____________ NO.
Goodwin v. Duncanpublic domain
668 F.Supp.2d 509 (2009) Joshua GOODWIN, Petitioner, v. George DUNCAN, Superintendent, Respondent. No. 03-CV-031A. United States District Court, W.D. New York. November 5, 2009. *511 Joshua Goodwin, Pine City, NY, pro se. Loretta S. Courtney, Monroe County District Attorney's Office, Rochester, NY, for Respondent. <
Larkin v. Duncanpublic domain
378 F.Supp.2d 188 (2005) Rayfield LARKIN, Petitioner, v. George DUNCAN, Superintendent, Respondent. No. 02-CV-6455. United States District Court, W.D. New York. February 17, 2005. *189 *190 Rayfield Larkin, Moravia, NY, pro se. Loretta S. Courtney, Monroe County District Attorney's Offi
McCullough v. Bennettpublic domain
438 F.Supp.2d 185 (2006) Robert McCULLOUGH, Petitioner, v. Floyd BENNETT, Jr., Respondent. No. 03-CV-0085(VEB). United States District Court, W.D. New York. July 14, 2006. *186 Robert McCullough, Elmira, NY, Pro se. Loretta S. Courtney, Rochester, NY, for Respondent. DECISION AND ORDER BIANCHINI, Un
Commonwealth v. Asmeronpublic domain
Cypher, J. The defendant, Eden Judy Asmeron, was convicted by a Superior Court jury in February, 2005, of deriving support from the proceeds of prostitution committed by a minor, G. L. *668c. 272, § 4B.1 Subsequently, acting on the defendant’s posttrial motion under Mass.R.Crim.P. 25(b)(2), 378 Mass. 896 (1979), the trial judge denied her moti
Van Beek v. Robinsonpublic domain
*709 OPINION AND ORDER LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment [dkt. 36]. The parties have fully briefed the motion. The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the parties’ papers
Commonwealth v. Fitzpatrickpublic domain
Duffly, J. After a mistrial at which the jury were deadlocked, the defendant was retried and convicted of two indictments charging murder in the first degree on a theory of deliberate premeditation.1 On appeal, the defendant claims that his motion to dismiss the indictments, filed before retrial, should have been allowed because the Commonwealth had not presented legally sufficient evidence at his fir
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANTS JOHNNIE GOODMAN, SR. AND BRUCE GOODMAN, DENYING MOTION TO SEVER, DENYING DEFENDANT JOHNNIE GOODMAN, JR.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT LYNETTE HURT-HATTER’S COUNTERCLAIM OR FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.