Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION Paul W. Grimm, United States District Judge Plaintiff Franz Butler brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, with related state law claims, against Prince George’s County, Maryland (the “County”) and County Police Officers William Windsor and Richard Reynolds, based on his arrest on June 7, 2012. Am. Compl., ECF No. 36. I granted summary judgment in the County’s favor on all but Pla

MEMORANDUM ** James Stringer, a state prisoner, petitions for review of the district court’s denial of his Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Stringer was convicted in the California Superior Court of one count of second degree murder, Cal-Penal Code § 187; one count of assault with a firearm, id. § 245(a)(2); and one count of being an ex-felon in possession of a firearm, id. § 12021(a).

MEMORANDUM ** James Stringer, a state prisoner, petitions for review of the district court’s denial of his Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Stringer was convicted in the California Superior Court of one count of second degree murder, Cal-Penal Code § 187; one count of assault with a firearm, id. § 245(a)(2); and one count of being an ex-felon in possession of a firearm, id. § 12021(a).

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THOMAS E. CREECH, No. 10-99015 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:99- cv-00224-BLW v. ORDER AND AMENDED TIM RICHARDSON, Warden, OPINION Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THOMAS E. CREECH, No. 10-99015 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:99-cv-00224-BLW TIM RICHARDSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, Chief District Judge,

MEMORANDUM WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR., District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I.History of this Litigation....................................................796 A. Consent Decree and Earlier Proceedings..................................797 B. The Court’s 2001 Findings of the Defendants’ Noncompliance................801 C. T

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 22, 2012 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. STEVEN WAYNE WILSON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sequatchie County No. 4568 Thomas W. Graham, Judge No. M2011-00004-CCA-R3-CD - Filed July 25, 2012 A Sequatchie County Circuit Court jury convicted the defendant, Steven Wayne Wilson, of first d

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 8, 2024 Decided November 22, 2024 No. 23-5129 ALPINE SECURITIES CORPORATION, APPELLANT v. FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of C

638 F.2d 172 15 ERC 1305, 11 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,204 Lamarr BADONI, Teddy Holiday, Betty Holiday, Jessie YazzieBlack, Jimmy Goodman, Begay Bitsinnie, Shonto Chapter of theNavajo Nation, Navajo Mountain Chapter of the Navajo Nation,and Inscription House Chapter of the Navajo Nation,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.R. Keith HIGGINSON, Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation;Ronald H. Walker, Director, Nationa

LOGAN, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment, which effectively denied relief to Indian plaintiffs making constitutional and statutory claims against federal officials. We are asked to determine whether the religion clauses of the First Amendment apply to the government’s management of the Rainbow Bridge National Monument and the Glen Canyon Dam and Reservoir, and whether an environmental imp

This is an action on two insurance policies for disability benefits and for penalties for vexatious refusal to pay. The petition contained three counts; the first two on the policies, and the third for penalties and attorneys' fees. The case was tried without a jury. No findings of fact or declarations of law were asked or made. The trial court rendered judgment for plaintiff on the first count for $248; on the second count for $1,242.32, and for the defendant on the third count. Defendant ap

358 S.W.2d 471 (1962) Alfred SHOUSHA, and Annette Shousha, as next of kin and parents of Luke Shousha, Plaintiffs-in-Error, v. MATTHEWS DRIVURSELF SERVICE, INC. and Robert Lee Yell, Defendants-in-Error. Alfred SHOUSHA and Annette Shousha, as next of kin and parents of John Shousha, Plaintiffs-in-Error. v. MATTHEWS DRIVURSELF SERVICE, INC. and Robert Lee Yell, Defendants-in-Error. Alfred SHOUSHA and Annette Shousha, as next of kin

ACCEPTED 13-15-00167-CV FILED THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS