Cases

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3017-11T1 KHASHAYAR VOSOUGH, M.D., an APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION individual, CHARLES G. HADDAD, M.D., an individual, MAHIPA August 27, 2014 PALLIMULLA, M.D., a

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 19, 2016 Session ANGELA CALDWELL, AS POWER OF ATTORNEY F/U/B OF LEATHY M. JOHNSON V. BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-002843-13 D’Army Bailey, Judge No. W2015-01076-COA-R10-CV – Filed June 3, 2016 In this health care liability actio

491 F.Supp.2d 975 (2007) United STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. SDI FUTURE HEALTH, INC., Todd Stuart Kaplan, Jack Brunk, Defendants. No. 2:05-cr-0078-PMP-GWF. United States District Court, D. Nevada. April 4, 2007. *976 C. Stanley Hunterton, Hunterton & Associates, Las Vegas, NV, Mark S. Hardiman, Law Office of David P. Baug

412 Mass. 800 (1992) 592 N.E.2d 1328 COMMONWEALTH vs. JAMES M. KATER. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Middlesex. March 3, 1992. June 9, 1992. Present: WILKINS, ABRAMS, NOLAN, LYNCH, & O'CONNOR, JJ. *801 Elspeth B. Cypher, Assistant District Attorney (Lance J. Garth, Specia

464 F.Supp.2d 1027 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. SDI FUTURE HEALTH, INC., Todd Stuart Kaplan, and Jack Brunk, Defendants. No. 2:05-CR-0078-PMP-GWF. United States District Court, D. Nevada. November 28, 2006. *1028 *1029 *1030 Crane M. Pomer

The controlling question before us is whether three affidavits of heirship were properly admitted into evidence. The affidavits were tendered under Rule 803 of the Texas Rules of Evidence.1 There were timely objections, and since there is no showing of the declarants' unavailability, the affidavits were not admissible under Rule 804. Since we hold that the affidavits are not admissible under Rule 803, the judgment of the trial court m

SMART, Judge. Appellant R.M. is the mother of five children who are the subject of this proceeding. In early October, 1991, R.M. traveled from San Bernardino, California, to Johnson County, Missouri with her boyfriend and her five children. The children ranged in age at that time from ten months to six years. Several days after arrival in the State of Missouri, the Division of Family Services took the children into emergency

MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On January 16, 2013, plaintiff Robert Zomolosky (“Zomolosky”), as a shareholder, filed this action derivatively on behalf of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”), a Delaware corporation, against certain present and former members of DuPont’s board of directors. (D.I. 1) On March 18, 2013, Zomolosky amended the compla

OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: On a complaint filed by the National Bank of Washington (NBW) to collect on two promissory notes that Mohamed An-war M. Hadid guaranteed, a jury found in favor of Hadid, crediting his testimony of an oral agreement by which his guarantees would become null and void if he were not given control of stock which secured the n

388 Mass. 519 (1983) 447 N.E.2d 1190 COMMONWEALTH vs. JAMES M. KATER. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Bristol. October 4, 1982. March 23, 1983. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., WILKINS, LIACOS, ABRAMS, NOLAN, LYNCH, & O'CONNOR, JJ. Jonathan Shapiro for the defendant. Lance J. Garth, Assistant District Attorne

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO . 05-2920 FRANK L. GALLEGOS, JR., APPELLANT , V. JAMES B. PEAKE , M.D., SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued September 26, 2008

[Cite as In re S. Children, 2022-Ohio-2941.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO IN RE: S CHILDREN : APPEAL NOS. C-210672 C-210680 : C-220005 C-220006

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In these related class action cases, plaintiffs Vida F. Negrete (“Negrete”), as conservator for Everett Ow (“Ow”), and Carolyn B. Healey (“Healey”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and a nationwide class of an estimated 200,000 senior citizens, allege tha

Opinion KRIEGLER, J. The electorate passed the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act (Proposition 47) in November 2014, reducing the punishment for various controlled substance offenses and some property-related offenses to misdemeanors. 1 Defendant Jose Miguel Robles Acosta petitioned the superior cou

568 F.3d 684 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SDI FUTURE HEALTH, INC.; Todd Stuart Kaplan; Jack Brunk, A, Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-10261. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 13, 2008. Filed January 27, 2009. Amended June 1, 2009. *688

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S THIRD MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In these related class action cases, plaintiffs Vida F. Negrete (“Negrete”), as conservator for Everett Ow (“Ow”), and Carolyn B. Healey (“Healey”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and a nationwide class of an estimated 200,0

Filed 8/17/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A161952 v. SHANNON GUILLORY, (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. Defendant and Appellant. No. 50106518.)

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 827 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 828 OPINION This is a wrongful death and survival action arising from an automobile accide

SULLIVAN, Judge (concurring in part and in the result): In Belfast, during the height of the “troubles” (the seemingly never-ending struggle between the Protestants and the Catholics in Northern Ireland), there was a popular saying: Anyone who isn’t confused here really doesn’t understand what is going on.

Opinion of the Court Quinn, Chief Judge: This is a companion case to United States v Daniels, 19 USCMA 529, 42 CMR 131 (1970), decided this date. For the reasons set out in our opinion in Daniels, we hold that the offenses on which the accused was arraigned were triable by court-martial. Six of the specifications on which the accused was arraigned alleged a violation of 18 USC § 2387. The court-mar