Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Landry v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co”
Landry v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
428 F.Supp.2d 531 (2006) Keith LANDRY, et al. v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO., et al. Civil Action No. 06-181. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. April 25, 2006. Covert J. Geary, Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere & Denegre, New Orleans, LA, Jeffery J. Waltz, Jones Walker, Baton Rouge, LA, for Keith Landry and Marcelle Landry. Bu
Landry v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.public domain
504 So.2d 171 (1987) Kermit LANDRY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO., et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 86-280. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. March 4, 1987. Rehearing Denied March 27, 1987. *172 Kenneth M. Henke, Mouton, Roy, Lafayette, for defendants-appellants. Pa
Clary v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.public domain
COOKS, Judge. In this expedited appeal we are asked to review the trial court's ruling denying Trey Coker's Exception of No Cause of Action regarding Gene Haymon's action based on Louisiana's Antitrust Law, La.R.S. 51:122 et seq., and the trial court's ruling denying in part and granting in part an exception of no right of action raised by the trial court. The denial of exceptions of no cause of action an
Judgment rendered July 17, 2024. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 55,712-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** THOMAS DAVID WHEAT Plai
Landry v. State Farm Ins. Co.public domain
529 So.2d 417 (1988) Wayne LANDRY, et al. v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. No. CA 870666. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. June 21, 1988. *419 William E. LeBlanc, Donaldsonville, for Wayne Landry, et al. Thomas A. Lane, Baton Rouge, for State Farm Ins. Co. Ben Lightfoot, Baton Rouge, for Ins. Guar
Shipp v. Wayne Joseph Landrypublic domain
WHIPPLE, C.J. LThis matter is before us on appeal by plaintiff, Darren Keith Shipp, individually, and in his capacity as representative of the Estate of Darren Scott Shipp, from a judgment of the trial court granting a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant, Wayne Joseph Landry, and dismissing plaintiffs claims. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Lambert v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
(2008) Terri LAMBERT v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY. Civil Action No. 06-8215. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. May 20, 2008. ORDER AND REASONS LANCE M. AFRICK, District Judge. Before the Court are the following motions filed on behalf of defendant, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company ("State Farm"): (1) M
Tammy Gipson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Companypublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON July 22, 2014 Session TAMMY GIPSON v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL. Appeal from the Shelby County Circuit Court No. CT00177708 Donna M. Fields, Judge No. W2013-02872-COA-R3-CV - Filed November 4, 2014 Following Appellant’s involvement in an automobile a
Chauvin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
495 F.3d 232 (2007) Daryl CHAUVIN, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO., Defendant. Caritha Williams, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., Defendant-Appellee.*233 Doris L. Huntley, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Allstate Indemnity Company,
Seruntine v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.public domain
444 F.Supp.2d 698 (2006) Charles SERUNTINE, et al v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO., et al No. CIV.A.06-1580. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. August 7, 2006. *699 Brian David Katz, Joseph Edward Cain, Soren Erik Gisleson, Brian David Katz, Herman, Herman, Katz & Cotlar, LLP, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiffs.<
Lasseigne v. Gerald E. Landry, L.L.C.public domain
SAUNDERS, J. Ijn this premises liability case, the Plaintiff failed to comply with discovery requests and disobeyed court-ordered discovery. Subsequently, the trial court entered a judgment of involuntary dismissal with prejudice against the Plaintiff. The issue in this case is whether the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing Plaintiffs case against the Defendants. For the reasons discussed herein, we set aside th
Paymentech v. Landry'spublic domain
Case: 21-20447 Document: 00516653713 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/23/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 23, 2023
YELVERTON, Judge. The plaintiff herein, P.O.P. Construction Company, as the assignee of Mr. and Mrs. Rodney Powell of their rights by virtue of a written assignment, brought this suit against the Powells’ fire insurer, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, to recover damages based on a fire that occurred March 25, 1973. The suit was filed April 11, 1974, more than a year from the date of the fire. The defendant filed the p
Cormier v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co.public domain
AMY, Judge. The plaintiffs allege that their car struck a cow on the road, causing injuries to the driver and the passenger of the car. The plaintiffs filed suit against the farmer who owned the cow, the usufructuary who granted the farmer a pasture lease on the property from which the cow escaped, the naked owners of that property, and various insurance companies. Four of the five naked owners filed motions for summary judgm
Gradnigo v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co.public domain
6 So.3d 367 (2009) Adele GRADNIGO, et ux. v. LOUISIANA FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INS. CO., et al. No. 2008-1198. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. March 4, 2009. *369 Edward O. Taulbee, IV, Taulbee & Associates, L.L.C., Lafayette, LA, for Defendants/Appellees-Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. and Hannah Venable.</
Collins v. State Farm Insurance Co.public domain
ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge. _J_jThis is an insurance agent negligence case coupled with an insurance coverage dispute. The insured, Edward Collins, brought this suit against his insurer, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”),1 and his insurance agent, Reggie Glass. From the trial court’s judgment granting Mr. Glass’ motion for summary judgment. Mr. Collins appeals. For the reasons that
Bell v. State Farm Fire & Casualtypublic domain
_[iLANDRIEU, Judge. WRIT GRANTED. Relator, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm), seeks supervisory review of the trial court’s judgment denying its motion for summary judgment. The facts of this lawsuit are undisputed. Respondent Charles Bell, Jr., was injured in the course of making a U.P.S. delivery to the residence of Laurence A. Dent, Jr. at 1134 St. Roch Street in New Orleans. Although the front
Daigle v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.public domain
In re Imperial Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.;— Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Landry, 27th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 07-C-1249-C; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 07-00892. Grant and remand to the trial court for reconsideration of its ruling in light of Carter v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 07-1294 (La.10/5/07), 964 So.2d 375. KIMBALL, J., would d
State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Torreganopublic domain
769 So.2d 754 (2000) STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY as Partial Subrogee to The Rights of Sylvia Landry and Sylvia Landry v. Richard TORREGANO. No. 00-CA-141. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. September 26, 2000. *755 C. Lee Drake, Metairie, Louisiana, Attorney for Appellant. Kevin O. Larmann, Metairie, L
CRAIN, J. lain this suit seeking penalties, attorney fees, and damages sustained as a result of the alleged bad faith of the insurer, the plaintiff alleges that the defendant insurer failed to pay a claim within thirty days after receipt of satisfactory proof of loss. The trial court dismissed the suit by summary judgment, finding no violation of the applicable statute because the payment was mailed within the statutory dela