Cases

364 S.C. 211 (2005) 612 S.E.2d 456 Anna H. LANIER, Appellant, v. Robert F. LANIER, Jr., Respondent. No. 3966. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard March 9, 2005. Decided March 21, 2005. Rehearing Denied May 19, 2005. *214 Donald Bruce Clark and Mary Ann Hall, both of

In an election to amend a city charter, the plaintiff attempted to enjoin the city from using allegedly misleading language on the ballot to describe the proposed amendment. While we do not address the merits of plaintiff's claim at this time, we must resolve two jurisdictional questions: (1) whether a district court has jurisdiction to enjoin a city from using allegedly vague and misleading language on the ballot describing the proposed amendment to the city charter initiated by peti

The principal question presented by this appeal is whether the imposition of a business license tax by Hall County upon places of amusement charging an admission fee and excluding therefrom places of amusement which do not charge an admission fee but derive their revenue from other charges, violates the due process and equal protection clauses of the Federal and State Constitutions. At the 1970 session of the General Assembly there was proposed a local constitutional amendment applica

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0073p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Appellee, │

535 F.Supp.2d 89 (2008) Derek CURTIS, Plaintiff, v. Cathy L. LANIER,[1] Chief of Police, Metropolitan Police Department, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-2029 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 28, 2008. *90 *91 Derek Curtis, Capital Heights, M

NUMBER 13-23-00091-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG REYNALDO GONZALEZ JR., Appellant, v. MORGAN GRAHAM, Appellee. On appeal from the 107th District Court of Came

McMurray, Presiding Judge. Defendant Hall appeals his conviction of a violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, selling cocaine. Held: The sole enumeration of error complains that the State’s evidence failed to rebut the entrapment defense presented by defendant and that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for directed verdict of acquittal. The State’s sole witness, an u

NUMBER 13-23-00091-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG REYNALDO GONZALEZ JR., Appellant, v. MORGAN GRAHAM, Appellee. On appeal from the 107th District Court of Came

WILLIAM L. CAMPBELL, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court, among other things, is the Metropolitan Government's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Docket No. 61).1 For the reasons stated herein, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. INTRODUCTION This purported class action is one of several such cases filed across the countr

601 S.W.2d 425 (1980) SPRING WOODS BANK OF HOUSTON, Appellant, v. Sidney E. LANIER, Jr. et al., Appellees. No. 6162. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Waco. May 15, 1980. *426 Douglass D. Hearne, Randell W. Livingston, Jr., Hearne & Babb, Austin, for appellant. William C. Davidson, Jr., Campbell & Davidson, C. Rober

118 Ga. App. 54 (1968) 162 S.E.2d 839 LANIER, by Next Friend v. KRZYWICKI. 43624. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Submitted May 7, 1968. Decided June 6, 1968. Rehearing Denied June 24, 1968. Alton D. Kitchings, for appellant. Adams, Adams & Brennan, Sam P. Inglesby, Jr., for appellee.

The relator presented an affidavit and petition in which he sought to invoke the original jurisdiction of this court and to have us issue an alternative writ of mandamus to compel the Secretary of State and the County Auditor of Cass County to print and deliver to qualified electors absent voters ballots containing the names of candidates for election to the office of United States Senator to fill the vacancy created by the death of the late Honorable John Moses. The petition was accompanied

Bell, Presiding Judge. Special ground 4 objects to the admission of certain testimony and presents the following contentions: “That the same was irrelevant and immaterial and not pertinent to any issues involved in this case, and under the *877evidence produced so far, too general and too vague to be a proper question for this witness and for presentation to the jury.” This

McMurray, Presiding Judge. Devin C. Culberson brought an action against William C. Lanier and Trea Lanier for injuries allegedly sustained when she fell down an open stairwell at a house Trea Lanier was renting from his father, William C. Lanier. Culberson’s claim against William C. Lanier is based on OCGA §§ 44-7-13 and 44-7-14, relating to liability of landlords for failing to keep leased premises safe and free of constructi

PER CURIAM. The record and briefs in this cause have been examined. The questions raised are the same as those raised in the companion case of Tyson et al. v. W. Lanier, Fla., 156 So.2d 833, which was consolidated with this case for purposes of review, one of said cases having been by appeal and the other review by certiorari. The matter having been disposed of by certiorari, the appeal in this case is accordingly dismissed.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge Keenan wrote the opinion, in which Judge Agee and Judge Harris joined, BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, we consider, whether the district court erred in. dismissing a complaint filed by three individuals against their forme

686 S.E.2d 554 (2009) 55 Va. App. 451 Antoine Lanier HALL v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 2328-08-3. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Salem. December 22, 2009. DaRong Park (Jason S. Eisner; Office of the Public Defender, on brief), for appellant. Alice T. Armstrong, Assistant Attorney General II (William C. Mims, Attorney General;

By Judge J. Overton Harris This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Suppress evidence seized pursuant to an allegedly invalid warrant. The Court heard argument on December 6, 2010, and took the matter under advisement. After careful consideration, the Court finds as follows. I. Background In June of 2009, a Task Force Officer (“the officer”) began an investigat

HALL, Judge. This is a suit brought by O. C. Lanier, a former employee of defendant, Trans-World Life Insurance Company, to recover $1,316.47 allegedly due as a bonus under the terms of an employment agreement between the parties and to recover three months salary and attorney’s fees in accordance with LSA-R.S. 23:631-632. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff awarding him the bonus as prayed for and rejecting his clai

WHITE, Judge (dissenting). In recording my dissent I acknowledge the excellence of the majority opinion in stating the questions involved and expounding arguments advanced for and against reversal of the chancellor’s decree. My conclusion adverse to the majority view by no means suggests that the instant problem is one that lends itself to easy solution. I nevertheless am convinced that the solemn effect of t