Cases

53 F.3d 343NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Larry J. STEWART, Plaintiff-A

ORDER PER CURIAM: Appellant Ashley Stewart asserted tort claims against Respondent Stephanie Entertainment, Inc. and professional athlete Larry Johnson stemming from an assault committed by Johnson in a nightclub operated by Stephanie Entertainment. Stewart settled with Johnson before trial, and dismissed him from the litigation. A jury awarded Stewart compensatory damages of $70,000 against Stephanie Ent

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 536 Randall Stewart and Larry Morgan appeal separately from a judgment entered on a jury's verdict in favor of James Bradley and Mary Bradley. We reverse and remand for a new trial. Procedural History On May 6, 2003, James Bradley and Mary Bradley sued Randall Stewart and Larry

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Appellant, Larry Stewart, appeals from the judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals dismissing his complaint for a writ of mandamus against appellee, Judge Michael J. Russo. Though indicted for aggravated murder with capital specifications, Stewart was sentenced to 30 years to life in prison after the jury

766 N.W.2d 800 (2009) Larry STEWART, d/b/a Larry Stewart Realty, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeffrey P. SISSON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-2104. Court of Appeals of Iowa. March 26, 2009. *802 Judith O'Donohoe of Elwood, O'Donohoe, Braun & White, Charles City, for appellant. Joel J. Yunek of Yunek Law Firm, P.L.C., Mason Ci

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge. This is a direct appeal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1293(b), from a judgment of the Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Tennessee declaring “invalid” Tennessee’s “opt-out” statute, T.C.A. § 26-2-112. Rhodes v. Stewart, 14 B.R. 629 (Bkrtcy.M.D.Tenn.1981). Confronting the polestar issue of the jurisdiction of a bankruptcy court to

OPINION DON H. REAVIS, Justice. By their sole issue, Gary O. Gardner, Beulah Darlene Gardner, and Hollister Gardner contend the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for Larry Pickard Stewart, Sheriff of Swisher County, and the Honorable Ed Self, acting as Swisher County Judge, denying injunctive relief, and ordering they take nothing against Stewart and Self. We dismiss the purported appeal for

Opinion ARMSTRONG, J. Defendant and appellant Union Carbide Corporation appeals from the judgment entered against it and in favor of plaintiffs and respondents Larry R. Stewart and Janet Stewart, on the Stewarts’ complaint. We affirm. Factual and Procedural Summary Larry Stewart worked as a plumber, or plumber’s apprentice, from 1968 until his diagnosis with mesothelioma in 2

Opinion issued December 17, 2009 In The Court of Appeals For The

OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. In this habeas case, Larry Stewart claims that a Confrontation Clause violation and prosecutorial misconduct undermined the fairness of his murder trial. But because the state court did not unreasonably reject these claims, we must reject his petition. We reverse the district court’s contrary decision.

DOWNING, J. | .¿Reverend Larry Stewart, pastor of the Rising Star Community Church1 (Rising Star), and Rising Star appeal a judgment decreeing that title to the disputed property at issue is vested in the Annual Conference of African Methodist Episcopal Church in Louisiana and Mississippi (L & M A.M.E.), the denominational hierarchy. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court judgm

711 N.W.2d 713 (2006) Larry STEWART d/b/a Larry Stewart Realty, Appellant, v. Jeffrey P. SISSON, Appellee. No. 04-1323. Supreme Court of Iowa. March 24, 2006. *714 Judith M. O'Donohoe of Elwood, O'Donohoe, Stochl, Braun & Churbuck, Charles City, attorney for appellant. Joel J. Yunek of Yunek Isaacson, P.L.C., Mason Cit

FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., MERCIER and MARKLE, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules

PER CURIAM. The plaintiff appeals from the circuit court’s order granting the defendants’ sworn motion to strike the plaintiffs complaint — alleging libel and slander, abuse of process, and malicious prosecution — as a sham pleading, and entering final judgment for the defendants. The plaintiff argues the court erred in four respects: (1) striking the complaint as a sham without holding an evidentiary hearing; (2) abusing it

Judgment rendered September 25, 2019. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 52,946-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** LARRY L. TAYLOR

ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Following his arrest for disorderly conduct and trespass, Ahmmad Pourghoraishi, a truck driver of Middle Eastern descent accused of trying to leave a gas station without paying for fuel, sued the gas station, its manager, the off-duty police officer employed as a security guard, the security company, and the City of Gary, Indiana, for intentional discriminatio

225 F.Supp.2d 16 (2002) Larry D. STEWART, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Paul H. O'NEILL, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Treasury Defendant. Reginald G. Moore, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Paul H. O'Neill, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Treasury Defendant. Miguel A. Contreras, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Paul H. O'Neill, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 90-2841(RCL), CIV.A. 00-953(RWR

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan October 22, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 149293

HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge. Larry J. Duncan and Lois Jean Duncan were convicted of eleven counts of mail and wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1343. They were each sentenced to 24 months imprisonment. The Duncans both contend that there was insufficient evidence to prove that they knowingly devised or intended to devise a scheme to defra

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan October 22, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 149293