Cases

POSNER, Circuit Judge. This is a habeas corpus action brought by a state prisoner. The state moved to dismiss the case as untimely, but the district court denied the motion, ruling that the statute of limitations had been equitably tolled. The question whether his ruling was correct is presented to us by an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). The question has two par

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 04-1154 PAUL T. WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. LARRY SIMS, Respondent-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinoi

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Skagit County, No. 11-1-00927-0, Susan K. Cook, J., entered October 29,2013.Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Verellen, A.C.J., concurred in by Lau and Trickey, JJ.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 4, 2014 Decided August 28, 2015 No. 14-5004 BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. LARRY ELLIOTT KLAYMAN, ET AL., APPELLEES ______ Consolidated with 14-5005, 14-5016, 14-5017 ______ Appeal from

WILKINS, Circuit Judge: Appellant Lariy Gooch, Jr. is currently serving a prison sentence resulting from convictions for a number of crimes, including four felony murders. We upheld those convictions on direct appeal. See United States v. Gooch, 665 F.3d 1318 (D.C. Cir. 2012). In a subsequent motion' to the District Court, under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Gooch allege

PER CURIAM: Plaintiff-Appellant Larry Moore challenges the district court’s denial of his motion for leave to amend his complaint. Finding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Moore’s motion, we AFFIRM. *456 BACKGROUND Moore, a L

SUSAN M. CHEHARDY, Judge. 12Pefendant appeals his conviction and sentence, and counsel for appellant moves to withdraw from this matter. For the reasons that follow, we affirm defendant’s conviction and sentence. Lastly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. Facts and Procedural History Because the defendant entered guilty pleas and there was no trial, the record contains minim

PER CURIAM. We grant the petition for rehearing filed by the appellant, vacate our prior opinion, and file this opinion as our amended judgment. Larry Griffin appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Griffin initially argued for reversal on grounds that (1) he was denied due process, (2) he r

[Published] PER CURIAM. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 24(b), Larry Flynt, a publisher, moved to intervene in two cases brought by Missouri death row prisoners challenging Missouri’s protocol for carrying out executions, for the limited purpose of seeking to unseal court records and docket entries. The district court denied Flynt’s mot

URBOM, Senior District Judge. Larry Griffin appeals from a judgment of the district court 1 denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We affirm. Griffin was convicted of capital murder pursuant to § 565.001 R.S.Mo. (1978) and was sentenced to death.

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC16-547 ____________ LARRY DARNELL PERRY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [October 14, 2016] PER CURIAM. The issue before

NO. 12-17-00231-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS LARRY PAUL MCLEOD, § APPEAL FROM THE 114TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

OPINION Opinion by Justice MOSELEY. Steven Hollaway and his brother, Larry Paul Hollaway, 1 had spent an evening together in Steven’s mobile home, visiting one another as they listened to music and drank alcohol. During the evening, Steven and Hollaway had left the home to stoc

820 F.Supp.2d 1131 (2011) William Larry SULLIVAN, M.D., Plaintiff, v. The PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. 5:09-cv-1015-JEO. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Northeastern Division. September 30, 2011. *1133 Stephen D. Heninger, Heninger Garrison Davis LLC, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff. He

Opinion VOROS, Judge: ¶1 Reginald Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for extraordinary relief under rule 65B of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. 2 We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Williams filed a “Petition for Extraord

POSNER, Circuit Judge. The Supreme Court has vacated our judgment in this class action Suit (reported at 702 F.3d 359 (7th Cir.2012)) and remanded the case to us for reconsideration in light of Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 1426, 185 L.Ed.2d 515 (2013). Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Butler, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 2768, 186 L.Ed.2d

POSNER, Circuit Judge. The parties to this class action suit, which is based on the warranty laws of six states, petitioned us to review separate orders by the district court ruling on motions for class certification filed by the plaintiffs. Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(f). The suit is really two class actions because the classes have different members and different

Bruns, J.: *527 *615 This is a derivative action filed in Johnson County District Court by Monica Ross-Williams on behalf of the Sprint Nextel Corporation. The action arises out of the 2005 mer

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan January 20, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 161803

Memorandum Opinion and Order Gary Scott Feinerman, United States District Judge After being turned down for a job, Gregory Williams filed this putative class action, which alleges violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. Doc. 1. Defendants made Williams an offer of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68, Doc. 62-1, Williams