Cases

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of August 2015 by Plaintiff to Substitute Counsel: "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of August 2015."

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D2024-3413 LT Case No. 55-2022-CA-1450 ____________________________ CAMILLE A. ABBOUD, Appellant, v. IRYNA R. ABBOUD and DERRI LASSITER YOUNG, ESQUIRE, Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County. Howard Ogle McGillin, Jr., Jud

ERVIN, Justice. In this case we are required to determine whether defendants North Carolina Baptist Hospitals, Incorporated a/k/a North Carolina Baptist Hospital and Wake Forest University Health Sciences (collectively, “defendants NCBH and WFUHS”), and defendants Terry Daniel, M.D. and Dayspring Family Medicine Associates, PLLC (collectively, “defendants Daniel and Dayspring”) we

McCullough, judge. Plaintiff Keen Lassiter as guardian ad litem for Jakari Baize appeals an order granting expert witness fees as costs to defendants Terry Daniel, M.D., and Dayspring Family Medicine Associates, PLLC, pursuant to section 7A-305 of the North Carolina General Statutes. Based on the reasons stated herein, we reverse and remand the orders of the

OPINION {¶ 1} Appellant William D. Lassiter has appealed from his conviction on multiple drug and firearms charges entered in the Jefferson County Court of Common Pleas. Appellant's counsel has filed a no merit brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel due to a lack of meritorious issues on appeal, pursuant to State v. Toney (1970), 23 Ohio App.2d 203, 52 O.O.2d 304, 262 N.Ed.2d

USCA4 Appeal: 22-4147 Doc: 55 Filed: 03/15/2024 Pg: 1 of 20 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4147 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MALEK LASSITER, a/k/a Leeko, Defendant – Appellant.

OPINION WENDY BEETLESTONE, District Judge. Plaintiff Carl Lassiter brings this action against his former employer, Defendant Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (“CHOP”), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”); the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (“Section 1981”); the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008, 42 U.S.C. § 1

607 S.E.2d 688 (2005) Jarvis LASSITER, Plaintiff, v. C.L. COHN (in her official capacity as a police officer for the City of Durham), and City of Durham, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Patricia Theisen, Third-party Defendant. No. COA04-672. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 1, 2005. Glenn, Mills & Fisher, P.A., by Stewart W. Fisher and

BEASLEY, Judge. Henry O. Young, III, (Plaintiff) appeals from an order granting Defendant’s motion for directed verdict on Plaintiff’s motion for modification of child support, a commitment order, and an order for contempt. For the following reasons, we affirm the orders of the trial court. Plaintiff and Defendant were married on 3 November 2001, separated on 13 August 2007, and subsequently divorced. They

DONNIE L. LASSITER, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF SELMA, and N.C. LEAGUE OF MUNICIPALITIES, Defendants. No. COA08-1148 Court of Appeals of North Carolina Filed: July 7, 2009 This case not for publication Lucas, Denning & Ellerbe, P.A., by Sarah E. Ellerbe, for employee-plaintiff-appellee. Teague, Campbell, Dennis & Gorham, L.L.P., by Dayle A. Flammia and S

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Baddour and the briefs before the Full Commission. Both parties waived their right to oral argument before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, and having reviewed the competent evidence of rec

OPINION GOLDBERG, Justice. In this appeal, the defendant, Troy Las-siter (Lassiter or defendant), asks this Court to set aside his 1998 murder, conspiracy, and assault convictions based upon erroneous evidentiary rulings and order a new trial so he may introduce newly discovered evidence to support his contention that he did not commit those crimes. Facts and Travel

In re Young Men s Christian Association of Greater New Orleans, Louisiana; — Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. J, No. 2005-11529; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2006-CA-1423. Denied. CALOGERO, C.J., would grant. VICTORY, J., would grant. WEIMER, J., would grant.

ARMSTRONG, C.J., Dissents. hi respectfully dissent. An exception of no cause of action questions whether the law extends a remedy against the defendant to anyone under the factual allegations of the petition. Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Inc., 05-0612, 05-719 (La.3/17/06), 929 So.2d 1211, 1217. In this case, the allegations of plaintiffs complaint seek recovery solely under a theory

*********** The undersigned reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Holmes. The appealing party has shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; and having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission enters the following Opinion and Award. ******

West, J. No final judgment is contained in the transcript of the record in this case. The order sought by the writ of error to be reviewed is as follows: “This cause coming on before me upon the demurrer of the defendants to the declaration, and the. court having heard the argument of counsel and being advised in the premises, and the plaintiff by his attorneys desiring to stand upon the said declara

3 F.3d 1482 85 Ed. Law Rep. 424 Albert E. LASSITER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.ALABAMA A & M UNIVERSITY, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, DouglasCovington; Thomas Fuller; Herbert Gray; RobertT. Hughes; W. Troy Massey; EddiePlayer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-6295. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Oct. 7, 1993.

OPINION (Filed with concurrence of participating judges) This is a dispute over a real estate commission. The chancellor in a bench trial awarded some, but not all of the claimed amount. The sellers of the property and the agent were dissatisfied with the ruling and both have appealed. The caption in this cause is confusing as the owners of the property were initially involved in partition dispute in which appellant Sam N. Young, intervened as

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 369 Matthew Michael Sullivan ("Sullivan", or "appellant") appeals from the decision of the probate court of Clark County, Ohio, holding that Sullivan, as the natural father of Michael Andrel Lassiter, failed without justifiable cause to provide for the maintenance and support of his child for a period of at least one

354 S.E.2d 595 (1987) STATE of West Virginia v. Russell E. LASSITER. No. 17251. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. February 25, 1987. *597 Robert H. McWilliams, Public Defender Corp., Second Judicial Circuit, Moundsville, for appellant. David W. Johnson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charleston, for appellee.