Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Laura J Koren”
Morales-Guevara v. Korenpublic domain
Opinion by JUDGE ROY * ¶ 1 The plaintiff, Jose Morales-Guevara, appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict against the defendant, Clame A. Ko-ren, awarding him damages for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident which, according to him, were considerably less than thé evidence supported.' We reverse and remand for a new trial. I. Background <
Laura A. Newman, LLC v. Robertspublic domain
JUSTICE EID delivered the Opinion of the Court. T 1 During jury selection in this civil case, the plaintiff challenged a juror for cause, but the trial court denied the challenge," The plaintiff then exercised one of his peremptory challenges to excuse the juror. On appeal, the court of appeals held that the trial court's denial was erroneous. Roberts v. Newman, No. 11CA1851, slip op. at 3-4, 2013 WL 831763
Laura A. Newman, LLC v. Robertspublic domain
Colorado Supreme Court Opinions || February 8, 2016 Colorado Supreme Court -- February 8, 2016 2016 CO 09. No. 13SC339. Laura A. Newman, LLC v. Roberts. The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado 2 East 14th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80203 2016 CO 9 Supreme Court Case No. 13SC339
Beechwood Restorative Care Center v. Laura E. Leedspublic domain
436 F.3d 147 BEECHWOOD RESTORATIVE CARE CENTER, Brook Chambery and Olive Chambery, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Laura E. LEEDS, Edmund Russell Altone, Robert W. Barnett, Anna D. Colello, Arlene L. Gray, Henry M. Greenberg, Antonia C. Novello, Steven B. Steinhardt, Dennis P. Whalen, Sanford Rubin, Susan T. Baker, Sharon A. Carlo, Cynthia T. Francis, Naomi B. Hauser, Joseph P. Moore, Mary Elizabeth Rich, Barbara W. Saner, Sue Kelly and Michael Dan
City of N.Y. v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc.public domain
Ramos, D.J.: *464Before the Court are cross motions for partial summary judgment.1 Plaintiffs, the City of New York and the People of the State of New York, move for summary judgment for (1) liability under the Contraband Cigarette Trafficking Act ("CCTA"),
LeBlanc v. LeBlancpublic domain
THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge. | ]This case involves a custody dispute between the plaintiff-appellant, Laura Leonard LeBlane (“Laura”), and the defendant-appellee, Mitchel Brett LeBlane (“Mitch”), over the parties’ minor child, Ryan, who will be fourteen years old in July 2007. The parties entered into a Consent Judgment on January 19, 2005, wherein Laura was to have domiciliary custody of Ryan, and Mitch was to have visitation wit
Terry D. v. Raderpublic domain
ORDER RALPH G. THOMPSON, District Judge. Principally at issue is whether or not a proposed Stipulated Agreement, entered into by all parties and their counsel of record prior to the entry of appearance of the Attorney General of Oklahoma, should be approved. This is a class action in which the plaintiffs allege that the operation of the juve*
People v. Washingtonpublic domain
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Supreme Court People v. Washington, 2012 IL 107993 Caption in Supreme THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellant, v. JAMES Court: WASHINGTON, Appellee. Docket No. 107993 Filed February 17, 2012 Rehearing denied May 29, 2012 Held Even though no gun was recovered
Haney v. Robertspublic domain
This is an appeal from a Portsmouth Municipal Court judgment dismissing a complaint filed by Danielle Haney, plaintiff below and appellant herein, against Kenneth and Tammy Roberts, defendants below and appellees herein. Appellant assigns the following errors: "First Assignment of Error: "Ms. Haney's claims are not barred since Civ. R. 13(A) is clearly inapplicable to forcible entry and detainer actions seeking only restitution." "Second Assignment of Error:
People v. Washingtonpublic domain
969 N.E.2d 349 (2012) 360 Ill. Dec. 539 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. James WASHINGTON, Appellee. No. 107993. Supreme Court of Illinois. February 17, 2012. Rehearing Denied May 29, 2012. *350 Lisa Madigan, Attorney General, Springfield, and Anita Alvarez, State's Attor
Beechwood Restorative Care Center v. Leedspublic domain
317 F.Supp.2d 248 (2004) BEECHWOOD RESTORATIVE CARE CENTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Laura E. LEEDS, et al., Defendants. No. 02-CV-6235L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. May 4, 2004. *249 *250 *251 *252
Beechwood Restorative Care Center v. Leedspublic domain
JACOBS, Circuit Judge. Beeehwood Restorative Care Center, a partnership owned by Olive Chambery and (her son) Brook Chambery, operated a nursing home in Rochester, New York. Following a series of escalating disputes between Brook Chambery and regulatory authorities — disputes in which Brook Chambery sometimes at first prevailed— the Beeehwood facility lost its operating certificate and closed in 1999. The Cham-berys and the pa
Electra v. 59 Murray Enterprs., Inc.public domain
19-235-cv Electra v. 59 Murray Enterprs., Inc. 1 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 ____________________ 5 6 August Term, 2019 7 8 (Argued: January 8, 2020 Decided: February 9, 2021) 9 10 Docket No. 19-235 11 12 ____________________ 13
Karen Cornish-Adebiyi v. Caesars Entertainment Incpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 24-3006 _____________ KAREN CORNISH-ADEBIYI; LUIS SANTIAGO; MONICA BLAIR-SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellants v. CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; BOARDWALK REGENCY LLC, d/b/a Caesars Atla
Commonwealth v. Powerpublic domain
Liacos, C.J. The defendant pleaded guilty to two indictments charging her with armed robbery and to so much of a murder indictment as charged manslaughter. The defendant now seeks to appeal from the portion of her sentence which places her on probation for twenty years with a special condition that she not profit from the sale of her story to the news media.1 The defendant requests that we vacate the
Rybak v. Dresslerpublic domain
178 Ill. App.3d 569 (1988) 532 N.E.2d 1375 SPOMENKA RYBAK, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant and Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. ORRIN DRESSLER et al., Defendants and Counterplaintiffs and Appellees and Cross-Appellants. No. 2-87-1238. Illinois Appellate Court Second District. Opinion filed December 29, 1988. Rehearing denied February 7,
Hill v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authoritypublic domain
591 F.Supp. 125 (1984) James HILL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. C81-294A. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta, Division. May 4, 1984. *126 Isabel Gates Webster, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs. W. Stell Huie, Paul A. Howell, Jr., Laura M. Murphy, K
Pinney v. Bridenstinepublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PATRICIA L. PINNEY, Plaintiff, Case No. 19-cv-2259 (JMC) v. JARED ISAACMAN, Administrator, National Aeronautics & Space Administration, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Patricia Pinney sued the Administrator of the Nat
Weber v. Biddlepublic domain
4 Wn. App. 519 (1971) 483 P.2d 155 LAURA WEBER, Respondent and Cross-appellant, v. CAROLE BIDDLE et al., Defendants, ROCKY MOUNTAIN FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant. LAURA WEBER, Respondent, v. ROCKY MOUNTAIN FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant. No. 296-1. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One Panel 2. March 22, 1971.
Daniel Campbell v. City of Los Angelespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,