Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Laura L. Haag”
Smith v. Smithpublic domain
67 P.3d 351 (2002) 2003 OK CIV APP 28 Judith Ann SMITH, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Stephen Michael SMITH, Defendant/Appellant. No. 96,752. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1. December 5, 2002. Certiorari Denied March 4, 2003. *352 Laura Haag McConnell, Hartzog, Conger & Cas
De Silva v. Pittspublic domain
PORFILIO, Circuit Judge. Petitioner-appellant S.L.V.M. Cyndie de Silva appeals the judgment of the district court denying her Hague Convention petition for return of her son, Jonathan, to her custody in Canada and allowing him, instead, to remain with his father in Oklahoma pending a custody determination. After “reviewing] the district court’s findings of fact for clear error
Kerby v. Kerbypublic domain
164 P.3d 1049 (2007) 2007 OK 35 Jennifer Ann KERBY, Plaintiff/Appellant/Counter Appellee, v. Robert Christopher KERBY, Defendant/Appellee/Counter Appellant. No. 99,970. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. May 15, 2007. M. Joe Crosthwait, Jr., and Traci L. Soderstrom, The Crosthwait Law Firm, Midwest City, OK and Laura Haag McConnell, Hartzog, Conger,
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Kerby v. Kerbypublic domain
¶ 0 Jennifer Ann Kerby (Mother) and Robert Christopher Kerby (Father), adversaries in an underlying child support modification case, both sought an award of attorney fees and costs after trial of the matter. The trial court granted Mother's request for attorney *Page 1054 fees and costs and denied Father's request for the same. Father argues the trial court abused it discretion in denying his request for attorney fees and costs and, instead, awarding the
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Robinson v. City of Edmondpublic domain
160 F.3d 1275 98 CJ C.A.R. 6156 Dr. Wayne ROBINSON, Curtis Battles, Wendell Miller, BarbaraOrza, and Martin Feldman, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITY OF EDMOND, a municipal corporation, Bob Rudkin, in hisofficial capacity as Mayor of the City of Edmond, CharlesLamb, Gary Moore, Steve Knox, and Barry Rice, in theirofficial capacities as members of the City Council of theCity of Edmond, Defendants-
New Mexico ex rel. State Eng'r v. Carsonpublic domain
John W. Utton, Utton & Kery, P.A., Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed an answer brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of Santa Fe County. Marcos D. Martinez, Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed an answer brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of the City of Santa Fe. Larry C. White, Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed a response brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of the Rio de Tesuque Association, Inc. Scott B. McEl
New Mexic Ex Rel. State Eng'r v. Carsonpublic domain
John W. Utton, Utton & Kery, P.A., Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed an answer brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of Santa Fe County. Marcos D. Martinez, Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed an answer brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of the City of Santa Fe. Larry C. White, Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed a response brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of the Rio de Tes
Akron Bar Assn. v. Snyderpublic domain
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 78 Ohio St.3d 57.] AKRON BAR ASSOCIATION V. SNYDER. [Cite as Akron Bar Assn. v. Snyder, 1997-Ohio-95.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation—Not delivering files to which client is entitled--Neglecting an entrusted legal matter— Failing to carry out contract of employment—Failin
Crysco Oilfield Services, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation v. Hutchison-Hayes International, Inc., a Texas Corporationpublic domain
McKAY, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a). 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. I. Facts Defen
55 P.3d 396 (2002) 2002 MT 216 In the Matter of the ADJUDICATION OF THE EXISTING RIGHTS TO THE USE OF ALL THE WATER, Both Surface and Underground, Within the Missouri River Drainage Area, Including All Tributaries of the Missouri River in Broadwater, Cascade, Jefferson and Lewis and Clark Counties, Montana (Basin 41I). No. 00-100. Supreme Court of Montana. Argue
Robinson v. City of Edmondpublic domain
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs and appellants, Dr. Wayne Robinson, Curtis Battles, Wendell Miller and Martin Feldman, appeal from the grant of judgment in favor of defendants, City of Edmond, Oklahoma, the City’s mayor, Randell Shadid, and its City Council members, *1228Charles Lamb, Gary Moore, Ron Mercer, and Kay Bickham, on plaintiffs’ Establishm
ACCEPTED 12-11-00303-cv TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/13/2015 4:46:09 PM
Smith v. Speligenepublic domain
990 P.2d 312 (1999) 1999 OK CIV APP 95 Barry SMITH, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Betty SPELIGENE, Defendant/Appellee. No. 92,198. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 4. May 25, 1999. Certiorari Denied September 22, 1999. Danny Corn, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, For Plaintiff/Appellant. Laura Haag McConnell, Hartzog
Adoption of C.D.M. v. Maxwellpublic domain
39 P.3d 802 (2001) 2001 OK 103 In the Matter of the ADOPTION OF C.D.M., a minor child, Kori Rene Wyman and David Lee Wyman, Petitioners/Appellees, v. Chad Louis MAXWELL, Respondent/Appellant. No. 94,879. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. December 4, 2001. Laura Haag McConnell, Oklahoma City, OK, for Petitioners/Appellees. Christopher A. Wood,
In re Garciapublic domain
[Re: Docket Item No. 1] ORDER AFFIRMING BANKRUPTCY COURT’S AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES FOR APPELLEES EDWARD J. DAVILA, United States District Judge Appellant United States of America (here, “the IRS” or “Appellant”) has timely appealed United States Bankruptcy Judge Arthur S. Weissbrodt’s May 2, 2012 order granting Appellees Richard A. and Laura J. Garcia (“the Garcias” or “Appel-lees”) an aw
United States v. Louis Agront, Sr.public domain
OPINION FISHER, Circuit Judge. We consider whether a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) regulation prohibiting disorderly conduct that creates loud, boisterous, and unusual noise, see 38 C.F.R. § 1.218(a)(5) and (b)(ll), is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the defendant, Louis Agront, Sr. The regulation, reasonably interpreted,
Myers v. Lashleypublic domain
44 P.3d 553 (2002) 2002 OK 14 Phyllis MYERS and Steve Myers, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Karen H. LASHLEY, Ph.D., Defendant-Appellee, Rhonda Lynn Thomason, Gilbert Medical Center, Inc., An Oklahoma Professional Corporation, Defendants. No. 96,102. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. February 26, 2002. As Amended March 20, 2002. Garv
Conforti v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER SPATT, District Judge. This case arises from allegations by the Plaintiff Vicki L. Conforti (the “Plaintiff’) that from 2005 to 2014, while she was employed by the Defendants Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. (“Sunbelt”) and On Site Energy Company, Inc. (“On Site”), her supervisors discriminated against her on the basis of her gender, subjected her to a hostile work environment, and