Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Lavone v. United States”
United States v. Lavone Williamspublic domain
OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge. The Government appeals LaVone Williams’s forty-eight-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute, and conspiracy to distribute, fifty grams or more of cocaine base. Before sentencing, the Government moved for a downward departure of two offense levels, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) and USSG § 5K1
United States v. Lavone Williamspublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 12a0250p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, -
United States v. Hubert Lavone Clintonpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Hubert Lavone Clinton appeals from the district court’s 1 judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding Clinton guilty on three counts of unauthorized acquisition and possession of food stamp coupons having a value in excess of $100 in violation of 7 U.S.C
United States v. Glenn Lavone Spiveypublic domain
PER CURIAM: Appellant, Glenn Lavone Spivey, was convicted after a bench trial on six counts of concealing stolen motor vehicles in interstate commerce, knowing the same to have been stolen, in violation of Title 18, U.S.C. § 2313. He seeks reversal of his conviction alleging there was insufficient evidence, he should have been gra
State v. Lavonepublic domain
261 P.3d 1105 (2011) 2011-NMCA-084 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher LAVONE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 29,266. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. May 24, 2011. Certiorari Denied, July 19, 2011, No. 33,084. *1106 Gary K. King, Attorney General, Farhan Khan, Assistant Attor
United States v. Smithpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas Lavon Smith, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. U
United States v. Burdenpublic domain
KEARSE, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in the majority opinion, although I find it difficult to interpret the stipulations in which these federal habeas *58corpus petitioners agreed to forgo review of their new sentences as not encompassing all facets of their new sentences. Each petitioner agreed that: [I]f the Court ad
Herring v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
United States v. Bosticpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Michael Bostic appeals his 48-month sentence, imposed after Bostic pleaded guilty to unlawful use of a communication, facility in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b), (d)(1).1 No reversible error has been shown; we affirm. On appeal, Bostic contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. We review the reasonableness of a final sentence under a deferential abu
Barrett v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Moore v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Honey-Love v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Moore v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for rehearing denied.
Dobie v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Moore v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
United States v. Porterpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Gregory Lavon Porter appeals the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.
State of Tennessee v. Vernon Lavone Robertspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 14, 2013 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. VERNON LAVONE ROBERTS Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2011-D-3400 Steve Dozier, Judge No. M2013-00466-CCA-R3-CD - Filed February 25, 2014 Defendant, Vernon Lavone Roberts, was indicted by the Davidson County Grand Jury for two
Jones v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER MARIAN BLANK HORN, Judge. Before the court is pro se, plaintiff Hildra Lavon Jones, Ill’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed on September 1, 2011. In order to provide access to this court to those who cannot pay the filing fees mandated by Rule 77.1(c) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims, 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2006) permits a court to allow a plaintif
Jones v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION HORN, Judge. The case currently before the court was filed by Hildra Lavon Jones, III, a pro se plaintiff and, at the time he filed the above captioned complaint, a prisoner at the Loudoun County Adult Detention Center in Leesburg, Virginia. Plaintiff filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis, which was granted. Although the complaint is captioned against the United States, pl
United States v. James Millerpublic domain
PHILLIPS, District Judge. Following a bench trial, James Lavon Miller was convicted of four counts of making false claims against the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 287. He appeals his convictions, arguing that the district court 2 erred by not renewing a Far-etta inquiry at the close of