Cases

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC GRIFFIN, J. The court has elected to consider this case en banc. We withdraw the prior panel opinion and substitute the following opinion. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company [“State Farm”] issued an automobile insurance policy containing an examination under oath [“EUO”] provision to its insured, Renard St. Louis [“St. Louis”]. The policy co

37 So.3d 918 (2010) William HADDEN, Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee. No. 5D08-3382. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. June 4, 2010. *919 Keith J. Lambdin and Laurence Trias of Katzman, Garfinkel, Rosenbaum, Maitland, for Appellant. Barbara J. Conner, William J. Denius and P

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANTS JOHNNIE GOODMAN, SR. AND BRUCE GOODMAN, DENYING MOTION TO SEVER, DENYING DEFENDANT JOHNNIE GOODMAN, JR.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT LYNETTE HURT-HATTER’S COUNTERCLAIM OR FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DAVID BRAMLETTE, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on Jackson New Media, Inc. (“New Media”)’s motion for leave to intervene in this action for purposes of seeking an order allowing the unsealing of certain court documents, or alternatively, for an order requiring the original parties to appear and show cause why the settlement agreement should not be un

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: As its courts have become a mecca for plaintiffs’ claims against out-of-state businesses, Mississippi is affording numerous opportunities for federal courts to explore questions of removal jurisdiction and remand. In this diversity case, the district court remanded a putative class action removed from the state court after making three decisions: (

406 N.W.2d 20 (1987) STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. George W. LAWSON, Glenda Lawson, individually and as mother and natural guardian of Dustin Seiler, Shane Seiler and Katie Seiler, Phyllis S. Ostensoe, as guardian ad litem for Dustin Seiler, Respondents. No. C6-86-1697. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. May 19, 1987. Review Denied June 30, 19

59 F.Supp.2d 1217 (1999) William M. ALLEN, etc., Plaintiffs, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY and Allstate Insurance Company, Defendants. No. CA 98-1226-MJ-C. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. June 25, 1999. *1218 *1219 Steven A. Martino, Mobile, AL, Stephen

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. *782 A fire destroyed Todd and Michele Borchardt's home located in Byron, Minnesota. A jury determined the fire was intentionally set, although not by Todd, Michelle, or Danielle Shaver, the Borchardts' daughter. Additionally, the jury found that Todd, Michele, and

526 N.W.2d 378 (1995) Frank GILMAN, et al., Creditors, Appellants (C1-94-888), Respondents (C5-94-943), and Brian Lawson, Debtor, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO., Garnishee, Respondent (C1-94-888), Appellant (C5-94-943). Nos. C1-94-888, C5-94-943. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. January 17, 1995. *379 John M. Riedy, McLe

ORDER NANETTE K. LAUGHREY, United States District Judge Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company moves to dismiss the first amended petition for failure to state a claim. [Doc. 21.] The motion is denied. I. Background1 Plaintiff Amanda LaBrier’s house was damaged in a hail storm. The damage was a covered loss under LaBrier’s State Farm

KEATY, Judge. 11 Plaintiff, Shirley Arvie, appeals the judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of Defendants, Charles Bourgeois and State Farm Fire & Casualty Company. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Arvie was involved in a one-car accident when the vehicle she was operating struck a cow on Highway 90 in Jefferson Davis Parish. The cow was owne

429 S.W.2d 430 (1968) Henry E. ARTRESS v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY. Supreme Court of Tennessee. June 7, 1968. *431 Robert D. Lawson, Chattanooga, for appellant. Spears, Moore, Rebman & Williams, Chattanooga, Thomas S. Kale, Chattanooga, of counsel, for appellee. OPINION BURNETT, Chief Justice.

284 N.W.2d 829 (1979) George D. HIME, Respondent, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant. No. 48078. Supreme Court of Minnesota. August 17, 1979. *831 Meagher, Geer, Markham, Anderson, Adamson, Flaskamp & Brennan, J. Richard Bland and O. C. Adamson, II, Minneapolis, for appellant. DeParcq, Anderson, Perl,

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is a putative class action brought by James and Lonnie McKinnie, and Larry and Tina Roberts on behalf of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company ("State Farm") insureds. The core claim is that State Farm refuses to pay prime contractor's overhead and profit associated with the estimated cost to reconstruct a structure where the covered loss is $25,000 or more.

Opinion MORRISON, J. Plaintiff Jean Marie Uhrich sued Paul Alan Lindseth on a number of legal theories. Lindseth tendered defense of the suit to his two *604insurance companies: American Home Assurance Company (American), which declined to provide a defense, and State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (State Farm, defendant herein), which provided a defe

879 A.2d 1252 (2005) 379 N.J. Super. 589 Wesley BOMBA, John Bouthillette and Donna Bouthillette, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY; Edward Abrams, Sr., and Joyce Abrams, Defendants-Respondents. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued February 28, 2005. Decided August 25, 2005. Jennifer L

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-FC-00827-SCT CALEB CRABTREE AND ADRIANE CRABTREE AS ASSIGNEES OF THE CLAIMS OF CASEY COTTON v. ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: SAMUEL S. McHARD P. MANION ANDERSON ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: GRAFTON ERIC BRAGG CORY L. RADICIONI

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER MATHY, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court are three dispositive motions filed by defendant in the instant case: (1) motion for partial summary judgment on plaintiffs’ extra-contractual causes of action1 and on their request for mental anguish and exemplary damages (hereinafter referred to as “Motion # 1”);

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARK MCDONALD; JEFF BARKE, No. 22-56220 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 8:22-cv-01805- v. FWS-ADS KRISTINA D. LAWSON, in her official capacity as President of the OPINION Medical Board of California; RANDY W. HAWKINS, in his official capacity as Vice President of the Medical Board o

American Fire and Casualty Company filed its bill in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, in Equity, under the declaratory judgment statute and made parties thereto J. P. Tankersley, L. M. Daniel, Shell Oil Company, Myrtle I. Ponder and the latter's husband. §§ 156-168, Title 7, Code 1940, as amended. The amended bill sought a declaration as to whether complainant is obligated under a policy of insurance to defend Tankersley or to pay judgments which might be rendered against