Cases

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-20-00232-CV __________________ ANTHONY MONTANO, CHRISTINE MONTANO, AND MICHAEL ROSMAN, Appellants V. KYLE CRONAN, Appellee ______________

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-20-00232-CV __________________ ANTHONY MONTANO, CHRISTINE MONTANO AND MICHAEL ROSMAN, Appellants V. KYLE CRONAN, Appellee _______________

People v Houle (2025 NY Slip Op 01437) People v Houle 2025 NY Slip Op 01437 Decided on March 14, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX 29-OCT-2020 02:05 PM

People v Fox (2025 NY Slip Op 02459) People v Fox 2025 NY Slip Op 02459 Decided on April 25, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-12-0000538 28-APR-2017 05:25 PM NO. SCMF-12-0000538 S

Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana On May 14, 2019, the applicants of the Counties of the State of Indiana set opposite their respective names as set forth in Exhibit "A" (attached hereto and made a part hereof) personally appeared in open Court. The State Board of Law Examiners of the State of Indiana, after due investigation as to the moral character and fitness of the applicants and examination to determine their respectiv

Ninth Court of Appeals BE IT REMEMBERED: THAT at the term of the Honorable Ninth Court of Appeals of the State of Texas, begun and holden at Beaumont on the 1st day of January, A.D. 2015, present, Chief Justice STEVE MCKEITHEN and Justices CHARLES KREGER, HOLLIS HORTON and LEANNE JOHNSON. “Pursuant to and in compliance with an Order of the Supreme Court of Texas, dated September 22, 2015, it is ordered that these causes be transferr

871 F.Supp. 1242 (1994) DOUGLAS COUNTY, NEBRASKA, Plaintiff, v. GOULD, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 8:CV90-00395. United States District Court, D. Nebraska. December 19, 1994. *1243 James S. Jansen, Douglas County Atty., Christine A. Lustgarten, Deputy County Atty., Omaha, NE, John L. Wittenborn, Kathryn M.T. McMahon, Collier, S

People v Fricke (2023 NY Slip Op 02436) People v Fricke 2023 NY Slip Op 02436 Decided on May 5, 2023 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

79 P.3d 869 (2003) 336 Or. 93 In the Matter of the Application for a Site Certificate for Northwest Natural Gas Company's SOUTH Mist Pipeline Extension, FRIENDS OF PARRETT MOUNTAIN, Larry Briggs, Leann Bennett, and George Burns, Petitioners, v. NORTHWEST NATURAL GAS COMPANY, Respondent. Washington County Farm Bureau, Clackamas County Farm Bureau, Marion County Farm Bureau, David Vanasche, Philip Lapp, Stacey Rumgay

On motion of F. Aaron Negangard, Chief Deputy Attorney General of the State of Indiana, and Cathleen M. Shrader, President of the State Board of Law Examiners, both members of the Bar of this Court, each applicant named in Exhibit A is by Order of this Court now duly sworn and admitted to practice as an attorney at law, and their respective names are ordered entered upon the Roll of Attorneys of this Court in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Cou

20-1517 In re: The Hain Celestial Group 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term, 2021 5 6 (Argued: September 27, 2021 Decided: December 17, 2021) 7 8 Docket No. 20-1517 9 10 _____________________________________ 11 12 IN RE: THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP, INC. SECURITIES

People v Collins (2025 NY Slip Op 07130) People v Collins 2025 NY Slip Op 07130 Decided on December 23, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrecte

DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge: On this appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Pauley, J.) denying petitioners’ motion to remand an Article 77 proceeding to New York Supreme Court, we consider again the application of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1453(d)(8) and 1332(d)(9)(C), exceptions to the federal jurisdiction conferre

Affirmed by unpublished opinion. Judge Shedd wrote the opinion, in which Judge Wilkinson and Judge Niemeyer joined. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. SHEDD, Circuit Judge: In these consolidated appeals,1 a group of homeowners who obtained second mortgages on their homes challenge the district court’s dismissal of their claims see

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROBERTS. ROBERTS, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Independent Equipment Dealers Association (IEDA) is a trade association of independent dealers of heavy construction and industrial equipment, such as cranes, large forklifts, and generators. IEDA dealers are “independent” in the sense that they are not affiliated with any manufacturer. In December 2002, IEDA wrote to EP

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Defendants appeal an order remanding these class actions to state court for want of jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), Pub.L. No. 109-2, 119 Stat. 4 (2005), and on the ground of equitable remand in bankruptcy. Finding the remand order proper in all respects, we affirm it in regard to CAFA, and we dismiss, for want of jurisdiction, the remand order in the Baue

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Defendants appeal an order remanding these class actions to state court for want of jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), Pub.L. No. 109-2, 119 Stat. 4 (2005), and on the ground of equitable remand in bankruptcy. Finding the remand order proper in all respects, we affirm it in regard to CAFA, and we dismiss, for want of jurisdiction, the remand order in the Bauer </

655 F.Supp.2d 1270 (2009) SOUTHEAST LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. BAYER CORPORATION, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical, Inc., Bayer Healthcare, LLC, Bayer Healthcare, A.G., Defendants. This Order relates to Case No. 08-80873. Case No. 08-1928-MD. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. July 30, 2009