Cases

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Sue E. Myerscough, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE . This matter came before the Court on January 19, 2016, for a bench trial. The first phase of the bench trial was completed on February 17, 2016. The trial resumed, on October 26, 2016. The Court heard testimony on October 25-27, 2016 and November 2, 2016. The Plaintiff United States appeared by Assistant United States A

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. This is an action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).1 One month after the plaintiffs moved for leave to file a second amended complaint, the defendant moved for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c), (Docket Entry No. 21), and responded to the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend, (Docket Entry No. 22

OPINION KEVIN MCNULTY, United States District Judge Plaintiff Britton Thomas (“Thomas”) brings a putative class action based on a *662statement in a debt collection letter he received (the “Letter”) advising that if Thomas took the option of paying the reported debt by credit card, a $3.00 convenience fee (the “Convenience Fee”) would be added. Tho

USCA11 Case: 23-12737 Document: 74-1 Date Filed: 11/04/2025 Page: 1 of 83 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-12737 ____________________ YIFAN SHEN, ZHIMING XU,

ALICE M. BATCHELDER,.Circuit Judge, dissenting. -1 disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the complaints have adequately pled a causal connection between Nationwide’s alleged inaction and the plaintiffs’ alleged injury, which is necessary to establish Article III standing. As the plaintiffs have not satisfied this fundamental requirement of federal court jurisdiction, I would affirm the district court’s di

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6950 Doc: 71 Filed: 08/15/2025 Pg: 1 of 55 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-6890 MANUEL MORENO, Plaintiff − Appellant, v. DR. CAROL C. BOSHOLM, Defendant – Appellee,

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6890 Doc: 71 Filed: 08/15/2025 Pg: 1 of 55 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-6890 MANUEL MORENO, Plaintiff − Appellant, v. DR. CAROL C. BOSHOLM, Defendant – Appellee,

441 F.Supp.2d 940 (2006) Nancy R. MURRAY Plaintiff, v. SUNRISE CHEVROLET, INC., and Triad Financial Corporation, d/b/a Roadloans Defendants. No. 04 C 7668. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 31, 2006. *941 Daniel A. Edelman, Cathleen M. Combs, James O. Latturner, Michelle R. Teggelaar, Thomas Ever

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, § § No. 528, 2015 Defendant Below-Appellant, § § Court Below: Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § RALPH ALLAN CEPEC and § C.A. No. N15C-02-184 SANDRA FAYE CEPEC,

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge. AmTrust Bank (“AmTrust”) filed a Complaint on July 28, 2009, against Defendant Lea Jordan and others. (Docket Entry No. 1.) On January 7, 2010, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation *330(“FDIC”), as Receiver for AmTrust Bank, was substituted as Plaintiff. (January 7, 2010 Order.

ORDER JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief Judge. On May 30, 2012, after an eleven-day trial and one day of deliberations, a jury returned a verdict against Silicon Knights, Inc. (“Silicon Knights” or “plaintiff’) [D.E. 802], The jury found that Silicon Knights failed to prove its breach of contract claim, and that Epic Games, Inc. (“Epic Games” or “defendant”) had proven its breach of contract, copyright infringeme