⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “Leah Wright Talbot”

Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-11-20 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Nov 20 2018, 5:33 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK court except for the purpose of establishing Indiana Supreme Court
Carcaño v. Cooperpublic domain
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2018-09-30 · Published · cited 0× · 350 F. Supp. 3d 388
Thomas D. Schroeder, United States District Judge This case originated as a challenge to North Carolina's Public Facilities Privacy & Security Act, 2016 N.C. Sess. Laws 3, commonly known as House Bill 2 ("HB2"), which required, among other things, that public agencies ensure that multiple occupancy restroom
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003-07-30 · Published · cited 0× · 294 F. Supp. 2d 667; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15479
MEMORANDUM AND PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 2946 BARTLE, District Judge. Before the court are the motions of plaintiffs in Weaver, et al. v. American Home Products Corp., et al., Civ. A. No. 03-20153, Neason, et al. v. American Home Products Corp., et al., Civ. A. No. 03-20154, Carter, et al. v. American Home Products Corp., et al., Civ. A. No. 03-20158, Parker, et al. v. A
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003-07-30 · Published · cited 24× · 294 F. Supp. 2d 667
294 F.Supp.2d 667 (2003) In re: DIET DRUGS (PHENTERMINE, FENFLURAMINE, DEXFENFLURAMINE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Katie Weaver, et al. v. American Home Products Corporation, Now Known as Wyeth Corporation, et al. Williette Neason, et al. v. American Home Products Corporation, Now Known as Wyeth Corporation, et al. Charlese Carter, et al. v. American Home Products Corporation, Now Known as Wyeth Corporation, et al.<
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995-02-01 · Published · cited 2× · 877 F. Supp. 308; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2137; 1995 WL 75287
877 F.Supp. 308 (1995) Michael H. HOLLAND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CLINE BROTHERS MINING CO., INC., et al., Defendants, CLINE BROTHERS MINING CO., INC., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Third-Party Defendant. Civ. A. No. 3:93-1170. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Huntington Division. February 1, 1995.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020-08-31 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1952 GAVIN GRIMM, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant – Appellant. ----------------------------- NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND, INC.; INTERACT: ADVOCATES FOR INTERSEX YOUTH;
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 313× · 903 F.3d 1090
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014-07-28 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1167 TIMOTHY B. BOSTIC; TONY C. LONDON; CAROL SCHALL; MARY TOWNLEY, Plaintiffs − Appellees, JOANNE HARRIS; JESSICA DUFF; CHRISTY BERGHOFF; VICTORIA KIDD, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Intervenors, v. GEORGE E. SCHAEFER, III
Bostic v. Schaeferpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014-07-28 · Published · cited 193× · 760 F.3d 352; 2014 WL 3702493
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge FLOYD wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge GREGORY joined. Judge NIEMEYER wrote a separate dissenting opinion. FLOYD, Circuit Judge: Via various state statutes and a state constitutional amendment, Virginia prevents same-sex couples from marrying and refuses to recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere. Two same-sex couples filed suit to challenge the cons