Cases

Filed 6/24/22; Modified and Certified for Partial Publication 7/15/22 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR THE PEOPLE, B300756, B305493 (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. GA10124

OPINION Tracy Christopher, Justice In this dispute between siblings concerning the administration of their mother’s testamentary trust, a sister appeals trial court rulings (1) removing her as trustee, (2) appointing a receiver, (3) approving the receiver’s application for approval of a settlement agreement with the sister’s brother, and (4) denying the

ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge. This case, originally brought against 23 defendants where the eight above-captioned now remain, comes before the court on motions premised on Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure separately filed March 10, 2015, on behalf of defen*784dants J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. (“JMM”) (DE 151) and Form

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-17-00447-CV __________________ EDNA ADAMS DUNCAN, Appellant V. HAROLD LEE BROWN, Appellee On Appeal from the 284th Distri

Affirmed as Modified in Part, Reversed and Rendered in Part, Reversed and Remanded in Part, and Opinion Filed December 28, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00962-CV JANG WON CHO, Appellant V. KUN SIK KIM AND VERONICA YOUNG LEE, LEGAL HEIR TO PATRICK HIY CHANG LEE, Appellees

Motions for En Banc Reconsideration Denied as Moot; Opinion of December 28, 2018 Withdrawn; Affirmed as Modified in Part, Reversed and Rendered in Part, Reversed and Remanded in Part, and Substitute Opinion Filed April 2, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00962-CV JANG WON CHO, Appellant V. KUN SIK KIM AND VERONICA YOUNG LE

#28401-a-GAS 2018 S.D. 67 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** DOMSON, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. KADRMAS LEE & JACKSON, INC. and DAKOTA ENGINEERING, LLC, Defendants and Appellees. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL C

ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, District Judge. Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for Class Certification [Doc. 42], and Defendant Lee Publications, Inc. has filed a Motion to Deny Class Certification [Doc. 35]. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion, DENIES Defendant’s motion, and CERTIFIES the class. I. BACKGROUND

182 P.3d 41 (2008) 2008 MT 80 342 Mont. 147 Bryan LEE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. GREAT DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellee. No. DA 06-0763. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs October 24, 2007. Decided March 11, 2008. Rehearing Denied April 23, 2008.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 3, 2009 Session Heard at Knoxville LEE MEDICAL, INC. v. PAULA BEECHER ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals, Middle Section Circuit Court for Williamson County Nos. 08-144 & 08-146 Jeffrey S. Bivins, Judge No. M2008-02496-SC-S09-CV - Filed May 24, 2010 This a

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: I. The instant case is a civil action for conversion and civil theft brought by the United States against F. Lee Bailey. This case has its origins in a criminal prosecution in which Bailey served as defense counsel. The facts of that case that are relevant here are recounted in our opinion in United States v. McCorkle

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-21-00178-CV __________________ L&S PRO-LINE, LLC AND LEE BURKETT, Appellants V. GARRETT GAGLIANO, SNOOK HOLDINGS, LLC, AND TACTICAL AUTOMATION, INC., Appellees _____________

195 S.W.3d 746 (2006) Garry LISTER, Nancy Lister and Doretta Moore, Appellants, v. LEE-SWOFFORD INVESTMENTS, L.L.P., Appellee. No. 07-04-0556-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. March 29, 2006. *747 John Mann, Law Office of John Mann, Maxwell C. Peck III, Amarillo, for Appellants. Karl L. Baumgardner, Whittenburg Whit

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Gary Eckelkamp, an employee of Melton Machine and Control Company (Melton), and two former employees, Bradley Hoe-mann and Ronald Kampmann, brought this action against Melton, its employee stock ownership plan (ESOP), and four Melton officers, alleging breach of fiduciary duty claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and Missouri comm

Affirmed as Modified and Memorandum Opinion filed May 17, 2005 Affirmed as Modified and Memorandum Opinion filed May 17, 2005. In The

OPINION OF THE COURT Kenneth R. Fisher, J. Defendants Gannett and the City of Rochester separately move for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s defamation complaint. Previous motions for summary judgment by Gannett, and to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 by the City, resulted in a denial by the Appellate Division. (Lee v City of Rochester, 195 AD2d 1000 [4th Dept 1993].) After dis

Affirmed and Opinion Filed February 14, 2024 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00932-CV DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellant V. TIM SUTTON A/K/A TIMOTHY SUTTON A/K/A TIMOTHY L. SUTTON A/K/A TIMOTHY LEE SUTTON, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

373 S.E.2d 345 (1988) Judy E. LEE v. Leslie A. SALIGA, et al. Michelle LEE, an Infant, etc. v. Leslie A. SALIGA, et al. Jennings PERRINE, et al. v. Leslie A. SALIGA, et al. No. CC971. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. September 16, 1988. *346 Vincent J. King, Hunt & Wilson, Charleston, for Jud

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

OPINION MACKEY K. HANCOCK, Justice. Appellants, Kyle and Beverly Greenwood, defendants and counterplaintiffs below, appeal the trial court’s summary judgment which declared the scope of an easement and respective rights of the Greenwoods as owners of the dominant estate and neighboring servient estate owner, Martha Lee (now known as Martha Clanton), plaintiff and counterdefendant below. The Greenwoods chal