Cases

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Howard Antonia Gosnell, Glenda Grant-ham Gosnell, and Robin Gosnell Logan appeal the district court’s order granting judgment on the pleadings for the Appel*206lee on its complaint for a declaratory judgment re

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Gerald Bruce Lee, United States District Judge THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Capitol Property Management Corporation (“Capitol”)’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 35), and Defendants Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, and Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company (together, “Nationwide”)’s, Motion for Summ

32 A.3d 1261 (2011) Brenda JONES, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated v. NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY. Appeal of Brenda Jones. No. 61 EAP 2010. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 10, 2011. Decided December 21, 2011. *1262 Amy Daubert, Harrisburg, W. Christopher Doane

433 F.Supp.2d 772 (2006) Donna ROGERS and Homer Rogers, Plaintiffs v. NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; Larry Whitehead; The Nowell Agency; and Stacy Beckwith, Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:06CV36LN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. May 12, 2006. *773

378 S.C. 25 (2008) 661 S.E.2d 349 Delmore CAIN, Appellant, v. NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. No. 26491. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard April 3, 2008. Decided May 12, 2008. Rehearing Denied June 12, 2008. *27 Gary W. Popwell, Jr., of

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-CA-01063-COA CHERYL COOGAN AND CRAIG COOGAN APPELLANTS v. NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY APPELLEE INSURANCE COMPANY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/21/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LAWRENCE PAUL BOURGEOIS JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HANCOCK COUNTY CIR

800 F.2d 422 Wesley E. DIXON, Appellant,v.NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Nationwide Mutual FireInsurance Company, Nationwide Life Insurance Company,Nationwide General Insurance Company, and NationwideProperty and Casualty Company, Appellees.Wesley E. DIXON, Appellee,v.NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Nationwide Mutual FireInsurance Company, Nationwide Life Insurance Company,Nationwide General Insura

784 F.2d 1176 Wesley E. DIXON, Appellant,v.NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Nationwide Mutual FireInsurance Company, Nationwide Life Insurance Company,Nationwide General Insurance Company and Nationwide Propertyand Casualty Company, Appellees.Wesley E. DIXON, Appellee,v.NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Nationwide Mutual FireInsurance Company, Nationwide Life Insurance Company,Nationwide General Insura

701 S.E.2d 390 (2010) NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Jaimie MARTINSON, Administratrix of the Estate of John Gilbert Martinson, Defendant. No. COA10-17. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. November 16, 2010. *391 Robinson, Elliott & Smith, Charlotte, by Katherine A. Tenfelde and William C. Ro

OPINION BY McCAFFERY, J.: ¶ 1 Appellants, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and related entities (collectively “Nationwide”), appeal from the trial court order requiring production of a document that Nationwide claims is protected from disclosure by attorney-client privilege. Nationwide specifically asks us to determine whether the trial court erred in finding that Nationwide had waived attorney-client priv

RENDERED: MAY 23, 2025; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2024-CA-0152-MR SCOTT PRESTON APPELLANT APPEAL FROM BOYD CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE GEORGE DAVIS, JUDGE ACTION NO. 21-CI-00084 NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND KENTUCKY ASSOC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2015 Term FILED _______________ June 16, 2015 released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPE

OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge. Richard Fraser, an independent insurance agent for Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, was terminated by Nationwide as an agent. We decide whether: he has stated a viable claim for wrongful termination under Pennsylvania law; he is entitled to damages under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and parallel P

71 So.3d 134 (2011) NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY; Nationwide General Insurance Company; Titan Indemnity Company; Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company; Nationwide Assurance Company; Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Company; Depositors Insurance Company; Victoria Select Insurance Company; Victoria Fire & Casualty Insurance Company; Peak Property & Casualty Insurance Corp.; Dairyland Insurance Company, a/k/a Sentr

COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge. A jury found that appellant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”) terminated appellees Manual Baralt and Juan Gonzalez-Perez (“Gonzalez”) because of their ages, in violation of both the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (“ADEA”), and Puerto Rico Law 100, P.R. Laws Ann. tit. 29, §§ 146-51 (“Law 100”). The two men and

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 27 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BLISS SEQUOIA INSURANCE & RISK No. 20-35890 ADVISORS, INC.; HUGGINS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.,

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Lisa Burger sued her insurer, Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Allied”), after it refused to pay a claim she submitted under her policy’s un-derinsured motorist (“UIM”) endorsement. The district court 1 granted summary judgment in favor of Allied. We affirm.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2021 Term FILED _______________ November 15, 2021 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK No. 21-0036 SUPREME CO

OPINION Chief Justice SUTTELL, for the Court. The defendant, D.F. Pepper Construction, Inc. (DFP Inc.) appeals from both the Superior Court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment and from its grant of judgment, after a bench trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Nationwide) in the amount of $283,964.27

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Covil Corporation, by and through its Receiver, Peter D. Protopapas, Respondent, v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company, Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2022-000366 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal From Richland County Jean Hoefer Toal, Acting Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 28221 Heard January 9, 2024 –