Cases

FLAUM, Circuit Judge, concurring. The majority has persuasively demonstrated why Leigh Ann Conley’s conviction is infirm and why the district court abused its discretion in excluding the Kritzik letters. I therefore join that portion of its opinion. I further agree that Lynnette Harris’ conviction must be reversed as well. To convict Harris for violating § 7201 and § 7203 of the Inte

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) STATE V. CONLEY NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, V.

WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge On December 12, 2016, plaintiff Kate Schultz filed a "Collective and Class Action Complaint" against her then-employer, Epic Systems Corporation, seeking to represent quality assurance employees who were "commonly misclassified as exempt from overtime wages under state and federal law." (Compl. (dkt. # 1) 1 (capitalization altered).) In response, Epic filed a motion to dismiss and compel individual

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-KA-00195-SCT DAMARIS QUINN a/k/a DEMARIS QUINN a/k/a DEMARIS Q. QUINN v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/29/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LEE JACKSON HOWARD V TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: COLLEN LEIGH HUDSON SCOTT WINSTON COLOM MARC DARREN AMOS

165 B.R. 203 (1993) In re Keith R. LEIGH, Debtor. UNION NATIONAL BANK OF MARSEILLES, Plaintiff, v. Keith R. LEIGH, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 92 B 14444. Adv. No. 92 A 01300. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. November 1, 1993. Memorandum Opinion on Motion January 31, 1994. *204

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge SENTELLE. SENTELLE, Chief Judge: Dan Rapoport, a Russian citizen, petitions this Court to review the Default Order the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or the Commission) entered against him for failing to respond to administrative proceedings initiated by the Commission on allegations that Rapoport viola

RENDERED: APRIL 24, 2025 TO BE PUBLISHED Supreme Court of Kentucky 2024-SC-0498-OA BRADLEY MICHAEL WILLIAMS PETITIONER V. IN SUPREME COURT HONORABLE LARRY E. THOMSPON, CHIEF RESPONDENTS JUDGE, COURT OF APPEALS; HONORABLE SUSANNE M. CETRU

273 F.Supp.2d 1041 (2003) SOUTHWEST PET PRODUCTS, INC., Earth Elements Inc., f/d/b/a Nature's Recipe Pet Foods, Real Party In Interest[1], Plaintiffs, v. KOCH INDUSTRIES, INC., Koch Agriculture, Inc., Koch Agri Services, Benson-Quinn Co., and Harvest States Cooperatives, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 95-02531-PHX-RGS (WGY). United States District Court, D. Arizona. June 11,

FLAUM, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs-appellants, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, initiated this suit in Illinois state court alleging that defendants-appellees violated the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act (“Illinois Wage Act”), 820 ILCS § 115/5. Defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois,

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) STATE V. SMITH NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, V.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned On Briefs November 7, 2012 Session SANDRA BELLANTI, ET AL. v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-004250-08 Robert L. Childers, Judge No. W2012-01623-COA-R3-CV - Filed January 30, 2013 Plaintiff motorist was seri

OBERDORFER, District Judge. Appellant Kenneth Coker, Sr. appeals from the district court’s 3 decision in favor of appellees Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) and Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”) on cross-motions for summary judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. <

670 S.W.2d 930 (1984) Howard C. OHLENDORF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bernard FEINSTEIN and Fred Whaley, Defendants-Appellants. No. 46968. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. April 17, 1984. *931 Jack H. Ross, Leigh H. Greenshaw, Coleman, Ross, Carey, Goetz & Schaaf, Inc., Clayton, for plaintiff-appellant

LAMAR WARREN, Circuit Judge. Final judgment: This cause came on for trial before the court, the parties having entered into a stipulation, the substance of which follows — That the defendant on December 5, 1969 sold a car to the minor, Stanley Leigh, for a total figure of $344.25, including title fee and tax; that the defendant admits that the purchaser is a minor and is entitled to disaffirm the co

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge. In an order entered July 24, 2012, 886 F.Supp.2d 1007 (W-D.Wis.2012), the court found that defendants Alliance Holdings, Inc., A.H.I., Inc., AH Transition Corp., David B. Fenkell, Pamela Klute, James Mastrangelo, and Jeffrey A. Seefeldt had violated various fiduciary duties owed to the Trachte Building Systems, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“Trachte

924 F.Supp. 894 (1996) Bill DEMITROPOULOS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. BANK ONE MILWAUKEE, N.A.; and Team Chevrolet, Inc., doing business as Team Chevrolet Geo, Defendants. No. 95 C 1753. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. May 13, 1996. *895 Daniel A. Edelman,

Mr. Justice Thacheu delivered the opinion of the court. This is an action by the creditor of an estate against its representatives, and the statute of limitations, enacted concerning the presentation of claims against the estates of decedents, was relied upon as the defence. This defence involved the question, whether an administrator, in order to bar claims not presented in eighteen months from the time of not

118 Ariz. 60 (1977) 574 P.2d 853 BEYERLE SAND AND GRAVEL, INC., Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Ricardo MARTINEZ and Joan Conley Martinez, husband and wife, Appellees and Cross-Appellants. No. 2 CA-CIV 2579. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2. December 7, 1977. Rehearing Denied January 11, 1978. Review Denied Febru

770 F.Supp.2d 950 (2011) Carol CHESEMORE, Daniel Donkle, Thomas Gieck, Martin Robbins and Nannette Stoflet, on behalf of themselves, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ALLIANCE HOLDINGS, INC., A.H.I., Inc., David B. Fenkell, Pamela Klute, James Mastrangelo, Stephen W. Pagelow, Jeffrey A. Seefeldt, Alpha Investment Consulting Group, LLC and John Michael Maier, Defendants, and Trachte Building Systems,

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge. Once the concept of employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) gained acceptance in the early 1970s, their numbers grew rapidly. See Steven F. Freedman, Effects of ESOP Adoption and Employee Ownership: Thirty years of Research and Experience, 2007 University of Pennsylvania Dynamics Working Papers, # 07-01 (January 10, 2007), posted at http:// repo