Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
17 opinions for “Lemarr E Wilson”
Vogel v. Albipublic domain
[Cite as Vogel v. Albi, 2020-Ohio-5242.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO JOE VOGEL, : APPEAL NO. C-190746 TRIAL NO. A-1806867 Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross- : Appellee, O P I N I O N.
State of Tennessee v. Joann Williamsonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 24, 2010 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOANN WILLIAMSON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Campbell County No. 14061 E. Shayne Sexton, Judge No. E2009-02363-CCA-R3-CD - Filed February 28, 2011 The Defendant, Joann Williamson, pled guilty to facilitation of the manufacture of methamphetamin
Crocker Park, L.L.C. v. Westlakepublic domain
[Cite as Crocker Park, L.L.C. v. Westlake, 2026-Ohio-2932.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA CROCKER PARK, LLC, ET AL., : Plaintiffs-Appellees, : No. 115356 v. : CITY OF WESTLAKE, OHIO,
Village of Maineville v. Hamilton Townshippublic domain
ORDER SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Senior District'Judge. Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs, the Village of Maineville and Salt Run, LLC, seek partial summary judgment on Counts 1 through 3 of their complaint. (Doc. 30) Defendant, the Hamilton Township Board of Trustees (hereinafter the “Township”) moves for entry of judgment on all six of Plaintiffs’ pending claims. (Doc. 25)<
Denny v. Wilson Countypublic domain
281 S.W.2d 671 (1955) Charles W. DENNY et ux. v. WILSON COUNTY. Supreme Court of Tennessee. August 2, 1955. *672 Louis Chambers, E.R. Woolard, Lebanon, for plaintiffs. Willard Hagan, Lebanon, for defendant. PREWITT, Justice. This is a suit instituted by plaintiffs, Denny and wife, to recover of Wilson County, damages for a ch
McClure v. Fischer Attached Homespublic domain
Haddad, Judge. {¶ 1} This cause is before the court on a motion for summary judgment brought by the defendants Mort Simpson, Villas in the Parke Homeowners Association (“VPHOA”), and Resource Property Management Company (“RPM”) (collectively, “the defendants”).1 The plaintiffs in this action have chosen to appear pro se. The defendants were represented by attorneys Stephen M. Gracey and Ali Razzaghi.
Craig Lyons v. Conagra Foods Packaged Foods Lpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I
Perry v. Davispublic domain
[Cite as Perry v. Davis, 2013-Ohio-4078.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CHAMPAIGN COUNTY, OHIO MARLA J. PERRY : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 2013 CA 6 v. : T.C. NO. 12CV295 DELBERT DAVIS, et al. : (Civil appeal from Common P
Ambrose v. City of Knoxvillepublic domain
728 S.W.2d 338 (1987) W.L. AMBROSE, Jr., Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF KNOXVILLE, Defendant-Appellee, v. STATE of Tennessee, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section, at Knoxville. December 19, 1986. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied March 9, 1987. Scott R. Fransen, of Ambrose, Wilson & Grimm, Kn
O'Loughlin v. Ottawa St. Condominium Assn.public domain
[Cite as O'Loughlin v. Ottawa St. Condominium Assn., 2018-Ohio-327.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Ruth A. O’Loughlin, et al Court of Appeals No. L-16-1128 Appellants Trial Court No. CI0201302988 v. Ottawa Street Condominium Association, et al.
State of Tennessee v. Phillip Packpublic domain
OPINION JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., J„ delivered the opinion of the Court, in which JOSEPH M. TIPTON, P.J., and CAMILLE R. McMULLEN, J., joined. The defendant, Phillip Pack, appeals from his Campbell County Criminal Court jury conviction of second degree murder, claiming that the evidence was insufficient
State v. Lovatopublic domain
The slip opinion is the first version of an opinion released by the Clerk of the Court of Appeals. Once an opinion is selected for publication by the Court, it is assigned a vendor-neutral citation by the Clerk of the Court for compliance with Rule 23-112 NMRA, authenticated and formally published. The slip opinion may contain deviations from the formal authenticated opinion. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: __________ 3
Wormley v. United States of Americapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) ELOISE T. WORMLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 08-0449 (RCL) ) UNITED
Wormley v. United Statespublic domain
601 F.Supp.2d 27 (2009) Eloise T. WORMLEY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-0449 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 24, 2009. *29 Ivy Ann Lange, Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights and Urba, Robin Elena Jacobsohn, Christopher Ryan Hart, Mat
Callahan v. Town of Middletonpublic domain
292 S.W.2d 501 (1954) M. L. CALLAHAN, Defendant-in-Error, v. The TOWN OF MIDDLETON, Plaintiff-in-Error. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section. May 25, 1954. Certiorari Denied October 8, 1954. *503 E. J. Harris, Bolivar, for plaintiff in error. H. T. McCaslin, W. J. Savage, Jr., and H. B. Denton, Bolivar, for defen
Lyons v. Conagra Foods Packaged Foods LLCpublic domain
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Employees of Conagra Foods Packaged Foods, LLC, (ConAgra) appeal the dismissal of their claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. , and the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act, Ark. Code § 11-4-201, et seq. , arguing that factual disputes preclude summary j
Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Bakerpublic domain
DISSENTING OPINION. To the statement of facts in the controlling opinion I will add only this: The appellant obtained his employment as a truck driver because of circumstances which in the very nature of things will probably not soon again occur. He was never required by his employer to drive the truck more than five miles per day, and there were "days and days" when he was not called upon by his employer to perform any service whatever in connection