Cases

Matter of Lenora D. v Richard J.R. (2019 NY Slip Op 07143) Matter of Lenora D. v Richard J.R. 2019 NY Slip Op 07143 Decided on October 3, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporti

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 07-3916 L ENORA R EID , Plaintiff-Appellant, v. K OHL’S D EPARTMENT S TORES, INCORPORATED , a Delaware Corporation licensed to do business in Illinois, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Nor

NO. 07-99-0122-CR NO. 07-99-0133-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A MAY 18, 2000 ______________________________ <

OPINION Justice BAER. We granted review to consider whether the Superior Court exceeded its scope and standard of review in substituting its judgment for that of the trial court in determining whether the child at issue in this case suffered abuse and whether that abuse was perpetrated by his mother. This inquiry necessarily entails a determina

895 F.2d 1381 22 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 868, Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,279In re Robert L. SUBLETT and Lenora A. Sublett, Debtors.EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,v.Robert L. SUBLETT and Lenora A. Sublett,Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants. No. 89-7300. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. March 8, 1990.

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-01-00520-CV William A. Brown, Jr., Appellant v. Ann Lenora Brown and Ann S. Brown, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF FAYETTE COUNTY, 155TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 2000V-174, HONORABLE DAN R. BECK, JUDGE PRESIDING Several years

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-01-00520-CV William A. Brown, Jr., Appellant<

935 F.2d 780 Lenora DAUGHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Donal CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant,Alton R. Hesson, Robert W. Starbuck, Funderburk, Rita A.Starbuck, Kevin W. Daniels, Bobby L. Chessor, Defendants. No. 89-6008. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued March 11, 1991.Decided June 10, 1991.Rehearing and Rehearing En BancDenied Au

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON OCTOBER 11, 2007 Session IN THE MATTER OF M. L. P. Direct Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Shelby County No. P9221 Herbert Lane, Special Judge No. W2007-01278-COA-R3-PT - Filed April 8, 2008 This appeal involves a petition to terminate a father’s parental rights that

KETCHUM, J., dissenting, in part, and concurring on the award of a new trial and the ruling that punitive damages are not recoverable in medical monitoring claims: A. Judgment Should Be Granted in Favor of DuPont I dissent from the majority’s opinion, and believe that a judgment should be entered in favor of DuPont because the plaintiffs failed to prove the r

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

Douglas L. Rayes, United States District Judge Plaintiffs challenge two aspects of Arizona's election system: (1) Arizona's policy *832to not count provisional ballots cast in the wrong precinct, which derives from the collective effect of A.R.S. §§ 16-122, -135, -584, and related rules in the Arizona Election Procedures Manual; and (2) Arizona

OPINION WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: In this case, we must address the impact of the securities laws on a company’s predictions of its future business prospects. We hold that the prognostications here are not the specific guarantees necessary to make such predictions material, and accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of the complaint.

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. Defendants Keith Maynie, Dietrick Banks, and Lenora Logan were each convicted of conspiracy to distribute and possess with the intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 (1994). The district court sentenced each defendant to life in prison. On appeal, defendants challenge both their convictions and sentences. We affirm a

CARLSON, Justice, for the Court. ¶ 1. Aggrieved by the chancery court’s termination of parental rights to his minor child in an adoption proceeding, Wilbur Andrew Simpson1 appeals to us. Finding no error, we affirm the final judgment of the Chancery Court of Leake County. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS IN THE TRIAL COURT ¶ 2. While in high school, Wilbur Andre

17-2861(L) Legg v. Ulster County In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ______________ August Term, 2018 (Argued: September 27, 2018 Decided: October 29, 2020) Docket No. 17-2861(L), 17-2863 (XAP)

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-1492 ___________ Charles Laverne Singleton, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the

12/16/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 10, 2024 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TRAVIS ANDREW HARRIS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2020-A-407 Cheryl A. Blackburn, Judge

SEYMOUR, Chief Judge. The instant ease is the attorneys fees arm of the Jane L. v. Bangerter abortion litigation that has been moving through the federal courts since 1991. The district court awarded attorneys fees to plaintiffs, but in an amount dramatically less than that requested. The court also awarded attorneys fees to defendants. We reverse in part and remand for two primary reasons. First, we reversed many