Cases

368 S.E.2d 613 (1988) STATE of North Carolina v. Melvin Leon LOFTIN. No. 495A87. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 2, 1988. *614 Lacy H. Thornburg, Atty. Gen., by Doris J. Holton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State. Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Appellate Defender by Staples Hughes, Asst. Appellate Defender, Raleigh,

679 S.E.2d 838 (2009) STATE of North Carolina v. James Leon LOFTIN. No. 148P09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 17, 2009. James Leon Loftin, Pro Se. Kathleen N. Bolton, Assistant Attorney General, for State of NC. ORDER Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 6th of April 2009 in this matter for a writ

366 S.W.2d 940 (1963) Marcus Moore LOFTIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 35638. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. April 24, 1963. *941 Mays & Jacobs, Corsicana, for appellant. Jimmy Morris, County Atty., Corsicana, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State. BELCHER, Commission

LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge: In these conversion actions, consolidated on appeal, the federal court is asked for a decision we consider impossible. The immediate question is whether the district court erred in granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment. The district court determined that it should refrain from deciding the issue on the merits, the rights to oil extracted from the Persian Gulf, because the decision

The opinion of the Court was delivered by PORITZ, C.J. *262 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. The Origin and History of Proportionality Review.....266 A. From Furman to Pulley........................266 B. Proportionality Review in Other States...........268 C. Propor

1, 2. The sole issue presented by the pleadings and evidence in this case, which is a proceeding to establish a copy of a lost deed, is as to the contents of the lost deed. Where the defendant admitted the execution of a deed to the plaintiff covering the land described, and the only issue *Page 316 was whether the deed was a warranty fee simple deed without reservation for the benefit of the defendant, or whether it contained such reservation, it was err

From a judgment of conviction for distilling, making, or manufacturing alcoholic or spirituous liquors, and for the unlawful possession of a still to be used for that purpose, this appeal was taken. The cause is here submitted upon the record proper; there being no bill of exceptions. The record is regular and without error. Judgment affirmed. Affirmed.

1. Where a petition in a superior court to establish a copy of a deed claimed to have been lost alleged only that the debtor resided in the county in which the suit was filed, that he had executed to the plaintiff a certain deed, a true copy of which was attached to the petition, and that the deed had been lost, and in which petition the only prayer was that "the clerk of this court issue a rule nisi calling upon [the defendant] to show cause, if any he has, why the copy deed aforesaid should

We have read the entire record in this case, and find that the defendant has had a fair trial, and, there being no error in any of the rulings of the court or in the record, the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

950 S.W.2d 82 (1997) WHITNEY CROWNE CORPORATION, d/b/a Midnight Rodeo; Payroll Services Corporation a/k/a Associated Club Management, Inc.; and Serena Deal, Individually and as Next Friend of Justin William Deal and Shaelyn Marie Deal, Appellants, v. GEORGE DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Appellee. No. 07-95-0302-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. January 8, 1997. Re

9 B.R. 41 (1980) In re Janice E. DEVALL, Route 1, Box 337-C Phenix City, AL 36867, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 80-00156. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama. November 4, 1980. *42 Calvin Pryor, Asst. U.S. Atty., Montgomery, Ala., for movant United States. Sam E. Loftin, Phenix City, Ala., for debtor. MEMORANDUM

259 F.Supp.2d 522 (2003) SONCY ROAD PROPERTY, LTD, Amarillo Cottonseed Hull Co., Inc., Golden Spread Energy Inc., City Machine & Welding, Inc., Krause Landscape, Inc., and Lance Plunk, Plaintiffs, v. George CHAPMAN, Karen Corp., and City of Amarillo, Defendants. No. CIV.A.2-01CV-0379. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Amarillo Division. April 25, 2003. <

OPINION OF THE COURT Jack Rosenberg, J. Defendant is charged with arson in connection with a fire that occurred on December 17, 1977 at 2075 Walton Avenue, Bronx, New York. Following are the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law as determined beyond a reasonable doubt after a Huntley hearing held on June 22 and 23, 1978. FINDINGS OF FACT On Saturday, D

RAWLS, Acting Chief Judge. Defendant, Lawton Wesley Pittman, has appealed from an adverse jury verdict and judgment entered thereon in an unlawful detainer action. The Haselwoods brought this action on May 15, 1967, in Clay County, seeking pos*44session of their real property unlawfully detained by Pittman who defended and counterclaimed on the grounds

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ANTHONY J. TRENGA, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Commonwealth of Virginia’s (“Commonwealth”) Motion for Relators’ Share Disbursement of $138,925.34 (“Motion for Relators’ Share”) (Doc. 107). This case arises from Plaintiffs Hunter Laboratories, Inc., and Chris Riedel’s (collectively “Relators”) qui tam action on behalf of the

BEN C. WILLIS, Circuit Judge. Final decree pursuant to Supreme Court mandate, June 28, 1961: Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court of Florida, pursuant to the order on rehearing in this cause (121 So. 2d 625, page 636) remanding this cause for the entry of a decree consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court, it is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that — (1) The final decree dat

BEN C. WILLIS, Circuit Judge. This cause came on for hearing on the petitioner’s petition for a writ of certiorari to review official orders of the respondent, Florida Milk Commission, bearing numbers NE-8; 8-N; TB-6; 10 x (11) ; and CF8, each dated November 20,1958, filed with the Secretary of State, December 13, 1958, with effective date set forth as January 1, 1958. To this petition the respondents have filed their motion to

BEN C. WILLIS, Circuit Judge. This cause came on for hearing on the motion of the defendants for a summary final decree on the issues presented by plaintiffs’ complaint and defendants’ answer and also came on for hearing on the motion of the defendants for a summary final decree on the issues presented by the counterclaim of the defendants and the answer to the counterclaim by the plaintiffs, and argument of counsel for the res

BEN C. WILLIS, Circuit Judge. This cause came on for hearing on the petitioner’s petition for a writ of certiorari to review official order no. 20-11 of respondent Florida Milk Commission titled “In the Matter of a Base Fixing Plan For All Milk Marketing Areas Except the Pensacola Milk Marketing Area,” dated January 16, 1958, filed with the Secretary of State and posted in the office of the Milk Commission on January 30,1958. To

BEN C. WILLIS, Circuit Judge. This cause came on to be heard by the court on December 19, 1957 on the defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint, and argument of counsel for the parties having been heard and the court being advised of its opinion in the premises, announced orally that the said motion would be denied. Thereupon, defendants filed their answer to the complaint — including therein their counterclaim ag