Cases

RHONDA K. WOOD, Associate Justice 11 After a jury trial, Heather Swain was convicted as an accomplice to capital murder and kidnapping. She received sentences of life without parole for murder and twenty-five years for kidnapping. She now contends that she received ineffective assistance of counsel when her defense counsel allowed one of her accomplices t

97 B.R. 660 (1989) In re FRED SWAIN, INC., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 84-02110-BKC-TCB. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. February 22, 1989. Leslie Gern Cloyd, W. Palm Beach, Fla., for trustee. Marc E. LeBlanc, Debra L. Glickfeld, Howard Houghton, Jr., Alexandria, Va., for Sheetmetal Workers Nat. Benefit Funds. Kaplan Sicking & Bloom, P.A., Steven

02/10/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 10, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. STEVE LESLIE SMITH Appeal from the Circuit Court for Williamson County No. B-CR190079 Michael W. Binkley, Judge ___________________________________

918 F.Supp. 749 (1996) In re the LESLIE FAY COMPANIES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. This Document Relates To All Actions. No. 92 Civ. 8036 (WCC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 5, 1996. *750 *751 *752 Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, New Y

OPINION Cornelia A. Clark, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Sharon G. Lee, C.J., and Gary R. Wade, Jeffrey S. Bivins, and Holly Kirby, JJ., joined. The dispositive issues in this appeal are: (1) whether the defendant’s extrajudicial statement was sufficiently corroborated for purposes of t

857 F.2d 623 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Daniel DARBY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 87-5150. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 1, 1988.Decided Sept. 15, 1988. Jay L. Lichtman, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant. Leslie

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Talladega County, Alabama, denying appellant relief in a coram nobis proceedings. The appellant was adjudged guilty of raping a 17 year old girl in Tallageda County in 1962, and sentenced to death. This court affirmed the judgment. See Swain v. State,275 Ala. 508, 156 So.2d 368. A thumbnail sketch of the facts as produced by the state in the rap

Sup. Ct. Ala. Cer-tiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

380 U.S. 202 (1965) SWAIN v. ALABAMA. No. 64. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 8, 1964. Decided March 8, 1965. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA. *203 Constance Baker Motley argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief were Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Orzell Bi

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama granted. Case transferred to the appellate docket.

89 N.Y.2d 560 (1997) 678 N.E.2d 882 656 N.Y.S.2d 196 The People of the State of New York, by Dennis C. Vacco, as Attorney-General of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alamo Rent a Car, Inc., Appellant. The People of the State of New York, by Dennis C. Vacco, as Attorney-General of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Budget Rent a Car Corporation, Appellant. The People of the St

Robert Swain, a Negro, was indicted in Talladega County for the rape of a seventeen year old white girl, found guilty, and sentenced to death. His appeal here is under the provisions of the automatic appeal statute. Act No. 249, appvd. June 24, 1943, Gen.Acts 1943, p. 217; Recompiled Code 1958, Tit. 15, § 382(1), et seq. Appellant filed motions to quash the indictment and the trial venire on the ground that Negroes were habitually, intentionally, and systematically excluded fro

565 F.Supp.2d 595 (2008) NOVARTIS CORPORATION; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; and Novartis International AG, Plaintiffs, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Defendant. Novartis Corporation; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; and Novartis International AG, Plaintiffs, v. Watson Laboratories, Inc. and Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Defendants. Civ. Nos. 04-4473 (HAA)(ES), 06-1130 (HAA)(ES).

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD J. HOLWELL, District Judge. Third party witness Ernst & Young LLP (U.S.) (“E & Y-U.S.”) objects to Magistrate Judge Pitman’s order, dated January 9, 2009 (the “Magistrate’s Order”), compelling discovery of various documents in its possession. For the reasons stated below, the Court denies the objection. BACKGROUND

OPINION OF THE COURT Stephen G. Crane, J. In these special proceedings, petitioners prevailed on their claim that respondents violated General Business Law § 391-g, by refusing to rent motor vehicles to persons under the age of 25. Petitioners now seek the imposition of penalties of $500 for each General Business Law § 391-g violation and costs pursuant to CPLR 8303 (a) (6). For the reasons that follow, petit

44 Cal.3d 1127 (1988) 751 P.2d 901 245 Cal. Rptr. 635 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. STANLEY WILLIAMS, Defendant and Appellant. In re STANLEY WILLIAMS on Habeas Corpus. Docket Nos. Crim. 21977, 23806. Supreme Court of California. April 11, 1988. *1133 COUNSEL Bert H

OPINION AND ORDER BARBOUR, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the Petitioner’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e).1 Having considered the Motion, the Response of the Respondent (hereinafter “the State”), the Rebuttal and all applicable legal authorities, the Court finds that the Motion is well taken and should be grant

7 Cal.4th 572 (1994) 870 P.2d 1072 29 Cal. Rptr.2d 64 In re STANLEY WILLIAMS on Habeas Corpus. Docket No. S011868. Supreme Court of California. April 11, 1994. *578 COUNSEL McCambridge & Deixler, McCambridge, Deixler, Marmaro & Goldberg, Bert H. Deixler, Manatt Phelps, Rothen

982 F.Supp. 1211 (1997) Robin FREE and Renee Free v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Mead Johnson & Company. No. CIV. A. 93-971-A. United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana. November 6, 1997. *1212 Patrick Wayne Pendley, A Professional Law Corp., Plaquemine, LA, Michael D. Hausfeld, Daniel A. Small, Cohe

MEMORANDUM OPINION GEORGE C. YOUNG, Chief Judge. This cause is before the Court on the petition of William Lewis Leslie, Jr., for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 12,1976 a state grand jury returned an indictment charging petitioner with first degree murder for the unlawful killing of one Michele Tanasy. Following the denial of petitioner’s motion to suppress confession, on Februar