Cases

907 A.2d 88 (2006) 280 Conn. 901 Irene D. BELLEMARE v. WACHOVIA MORTGAGE CORPORATION. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Decided September 13, 2006. Eddi Z. Zyko, Middlebury, in support of the petition. The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn.App. 593, 894 A.2d 335 (2006), is granted, limited to the following

931 A.2d 916 (2007) 284 Conn. 193 Irene D. BELLEMARE v. WACHOVIA MORTGAGE CORPORATION. No. 17726. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued March 15, 2007. Decided October 9, 2007. *918 Eddi Z. Zyko, Middlebury, for the appellant (plaintiff). Thomas A. Kaelin, Watertown, for the appellee

*595 Opinion BISHOP, J. The plaintiff, Irene D. Bellemare, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court on all counts of her complaint in favor of the defendant, Wachovia Mortgage Corporation. In response to competing motions for summary judgment filed by the parties, the court concluded that General Statutes § 52-577 barred b

VANDE WALLE, Justice. Daniel Bellemare appeals from district court summary judgments dismissing his complaints against Gateway Builders, Inc. (Gateway), and Anton Rutten. We affirm. In 1979, Bellemare leased Rutten’s farmland on a crop-share basis. On October 29, 1979, Bellemare was injured when he fell from a ladder attached to a Butler grain bin on the premises. The bin had been sold to Rutten and erect

399 N.W.2d 308 (1987) Daniel BELLEMARE, Plaintiff, v. GATEWAY BUILDERS, INC., and Anton Rutten, Defendants. Civ. No. 11335. Supreme Court of North Dakota. January 20, 1987. Dosland, Dosland, Nordhougen, Lillehaug & Johnson, Moorhead, for plaintiff; argued by Colleen J. Saande. *309 Greenberg, Colosimo & Patchin, Vi

The accident happened in a public highway at the intersection of Central and Franklin Streets in Franklin on the afternoon of July 20, 1943. Central Street runs east and west, and Franklin Street intersects it from the south but does not cross it. Approximately in line with the sidewalks of Franklin Street, two crosswalks traverse Central Street to the northerly curb of the latter street. There were traffic lights at the intersection, but at the time of the accident they were not showing alte

ORDER Before: WELLFORD, Circuit Judge; and PECK and LIVELY * , Senior Circuit Judges. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), plaintiff-appellee, moves for clarification of the award of attorneys’ fees in our January 17, 1989 decision in the above-captioned case, 865 F.2d 780 (6th Ci

SHERIDAN, J. The defendants, Krzysztof Rutkowski and Tri-City Trading, LLC, appeal from the judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, American Express Bank, FSB. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly rendered summary judgment as to liability on the plaintiff's claim of breach of a contractual credit agreement because the statute of frauds, Gener

39 A.3d 1202 (2012) 134 Conn.App. 607 Denise MOLLICA et al. v. Edward TOOHEY. No. 32536. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Submitted on Briefs January 13, 2012. Decided April 3, 2012. *1203 Jeffrey M. Cooper and Jeremy C. Virgil, Bridgeport, filed a brief for the appellants (plaintiffs).

31 A.3d 448 (2011) 132 Conn.App. 306 Joseph LEWIS v. Tina E. DREW et al. No. 32268. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued October 14, 2011. Decided November 29, 2011. Robert N. Saraco, Jr., Bridgeport, for the appellant (plaintiff). Ronald D. Williams, Jr., Trumbull, for the appellee (defendant state of Connecticut).<

991 A.2d 716 (2010) 120 Conn.App. 432 Robert BERLINGER v. Michael KUDEJ. No. 30424. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Submitted on Briefs February 17, 2010. Decided April 13, 2010. *717 Jonathan Perkins, Woodbridge, filed a brief for the appellant (plaintiff). Kenneth J. Mulvey, Jr.,

968 A.2d 956 (2009) 114 Conn.App. 123 TUCCIO DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. Harry NEUMANN, Jr. No. 29598. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued February 19, 2009. Decided April 28, 2009. *957 John R. Williams, New Haven, for the appellant (plaintiff). Charles E. Vermette, Jr., with whom, on

ZARELLA, J., concurring. I agree with the result reached by the majority. I write separately, however, because, in my view, nothing in General Statutes § 7-433c1 requires that notice of hypertension or heart disease be given to a municipal employer within a specified period of time in order for a claimant to receive compensation. I am aware that our pr

[Cite as Marchese Servs. v. Bradley, 2009-Ohio-2618.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT PUTNAM COUNTY MARCHESE SERVICES, INC., APPELLEE, v. CASE NO. 12-08-06 AMBER BRADLEY, APPELLEE, v. OPINION DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES,

Opinion BISHOP, J. The plaintiff, Richard Read, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after the granting of a motion to strike certain counts of his complaint filed by the defendants, the town of Plymouth (town), Ralph J. Zombouski and Gary Belanger, and a motion for summary judgment filed by the town as to the remaining count. On appeal,

21 A.3d 816 (2011) 301 Conn. 657 Catherine FARRELL et al. v. TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 18544. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued April 20, 2011. Decided July 19, 2011. *818 Campbell D. Barrett, with whom were Jon T. Kukucka, Hartford, and, on the brief, Felicia C. Hunt,

SHELDON, J. The plaintiff, Barry Graham, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, the Commissioner of Transportation, in this action to recover damages under the state defective highway statute, General Statutes § 13a-144. 1 The plaintiff commenced this action on

(2008) Mark BARRON, Plaintiff, v. VISION SERVICE PLAN, Defendant. No. 3:07CV3902. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. June 30, 2008. ORDER JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge. This case involves the alleged breach of a contract. Plaintiff Mark Barron, an Ohio-based optometrist, alleges that defendant Vision Service Plan [VSP], a

949 A.2d 488 (2008) 108 Conn.App. 410 Tobias C. ANDERSON v. GORDON, MUIR AND FOLEY, LLP, et al. No. 27984. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued January 18, 2008. Decided June 17, 2008. *489 Tobias C. Anderson, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff). Louis B. Blumenfeld, with whom was L