Cases

Dual-Purpose Corp. v Hadjandreas (2022 NY Slip Op 02113) Dual-Purpose Corp. v Hadjandreas 2022 NY Slip Op 02113 Decided on March 30, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting B

IV. ANALYSIS A. Effect of Decree and Change of Beneficiary Two well-established propositions in Iowa law clarify the parties' rights in this case. First, under ordinary circumstances, a named beneficiary has no vested interest in the insurance policy. Stackhouse v. Russell , 447 N.W.2d 124

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GINA LATTURE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-1364 (TJK) PRIORITY LIFE CARE, LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In January 2021, Gina Latture began working as the director of marketing for Priority Life Care, LLC while the company prepared to open a ne

301 S.W.3d 196 (2009) NORMA FAYE PYLES LYNCH FAMILY PURPOSE LLC v. PUTNAM COUNTY, Tennessee et al. No. M2008-02634-SC-R10-CV. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. June 3, 2009 Session. December 16, 2009. *199 Robert A. Anderson, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Norma Faye Pyles Lynch Family Purpose L

Filed 9/16/24 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE ROBERT S. SAMUELIAN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, G061911, G062416 & G062426 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2021- 01194619)

D'AURIA, J. In this certified appeal, we are asked to determine whether there exists either an absolute or qualified testimonial privilege for an unretained expert who previously has rendered an opinion relevant to the issues in a pending case. The defendant in error, the town of Redding (town), appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court, which granted the writ of error filed by

Filed 8/20/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE ROBERT S. SAMUELIAN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, G061911, G062416 & G062426 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2021- 01194619) LIFE GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE, LLC, et al.,

Filed 3/25/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE BRINAN WEEKS B323430 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 22STCV03531) v. INTERACTIVE LIFE FORMS, LLC, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the Superi

Sack, Circuit Judge: Lincoln Benefit Life Company ("Lincoln") is an insurance company with its principal place of business in Lincoln, Nebraska. In 2008, it approved and issued a life insurance policy for Gabriela Fischer, the insured. The policy application, amongst other misstatements, fraudulently exaggerated Fischer's wealth. The policy was paid for by a stranger to the transaction, which rendered the policy voidable. (The parti

JUDGMENT, MEMORANDUM & ORDER Jack B, Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction... 140 II. Facts... 141 III. Arguments... 141 A. AEI... 141 B. LBL...142 *140C. September 23 and September 2

Filed 4/4/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT RELIANT LIFE SHARES, LLC, B305544 Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant; Los Angeles County SEAN MICHAELS et al., Super. Ct. No. BC604858 Cross-defendants and Appellants; PB CONSULTING #2, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. DANIEL

BEACH, J. The plaintiff in error, David R. Salinas, an appraiser, provided two opinions to banks regarding the value of a certain property. In a subsequent, unrelated tax appeal regarding that property, a party sought to compel him to testify in a deposition regarding those opinions. The issue presented in this writ of error is whether an expert, who previously has rendered an opinion o

MEMORANDUM & ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction..............................................................39 II. Facts....................................................................40 A Insurance Policy......................................................40 B. New Jersey Acti

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CLEAN LABEL PROJECT FOUNDATION, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 20-3229 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CLEAN LABEL PROJECT : FOUNDATION, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 20-3229 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 7

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, United States District Judge Vestor Capital Partners, LLC (“Vestor”) had insured the life of its president, Brian Baker, for $5 million. But in October 2012, Vestor submitted paperwork to reduce the *978amount of the policy to $2 million. Just after Vestor submitted the necessary forms—but befor

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 07-MAY-2024 10:27 AM Dkt. 130 SO NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS NOEL LIFE, § No. 08-23-00055-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § 41st Judicial District Court GINO MORENA ENTERPRISES, LLC, §

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Slice of Life, LLC and : Val Kleyman, : Appellants : : v. : : Hamilton Township Zoning Hearing : No. 941 C.D. 2016 Board and Hamilton Township : Argued: April 20, 2017 BEFORE: HONORABLE MARY HANNAH LEAVITT, President Judge

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr