Cases

Case: 12-14898 Date Filed: 07/24/2014 Page: 1 of 21 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-14898 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:08-md-01916-KAM LILIANA MARIA CARDONA, JOHN DOE, ANGELA MARIA HENAO MONTES, et al.,

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

OPINION GERRY, District Judge. Presently before this court are motions by defendants Maria Rusbi-Cardona and Arledt Espinal-Cardona to suppress certain post-arrest statements that were allegedly taken in violation of their constitutional rights. The two defendants (who are mother and son) were arrested on November 5, 1985, along with Arledt Espinal-Cardona’s wife, Liliana Espinal-Pinzon, at Port Newark, N

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Appellant Karen Liliana Rivas Durán ("Rivas-Durán") fled her native El Salvador and entered the United States without inspection with her twin sons. After being detained, Rivas-Durán sought asylum, with her sons as derivative beneficiaries, claiming that the children's father threatened her on numerous occasions. The Immigration Judge ("IJ") granted Rivas-Durán

—Yesawich Jr., J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Bradley, J.), entered July 8, 1997 in Ulster County, which granted defendant’s motion for pendente lite relief. While the record in this divorce action provides ample justification for Supreme Court’s finding that defendant is entitled to interim relief in the form of counsel and expert fees, it furnishes no basis for determining the amounts that should

Case: 19-11494 Date Filed: 07/16/2020 Page: 1 of 27 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-11494 ________________________ D.C. Docket Nos. 0:08-md-01916-KAM; 0:08-cv-60821-KAM IN RE: CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. ALIEN T

32 S.W.3d 383 (2000) JOE GUERRA EXXON STATION, Appellant, v. MICHELIN TYRE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, Appellee. No. 04-00-00049-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. October 25, 2000. *384 Kevin D. Jewell, Robert H. Bateman, Teresa J. Waldrop, Magenheim Bateman & Helfand, P.L.L.C., Houston, Marcel C. Notzon, III, Alvarez &

Opinion NICHOLSON, J. —Defendant Faustino Nieto Romero murdered Javier Aguilar and Charles Smythe and committed several other crimes. Convicted by jury of those crimes and sentenced to two terms of life without possibility of parole and various other terms, defendant appeals. *707On appeal, defendant contends (1) the trial court erred

534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder

Mr. Justice Hernández Matos delivered the opinion of the Court. *662Because of the similar relation existing between the eight above-entitled actions of filiation, this Court has agreed to consolidate them for the purpose of deciding them jointly in a single opinion. In order to have a clear and orderly relation of the facts and circ

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under

El Juez Asociado Señor Hernández Matos emitió la opinión del Tribunal. Por la relación de semejanza existente entre los ocho recursos filiatorios arriba intitulados, el Tribunal acordó su acumulación a los fines de resolverlos conjuntamente, mediante una sola ponencia. En ánimo de lograr claridad y orden en la relación de los hechos y circunstancias concurrentes en cada recurso y el mejor ent