Cases

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,__________________ September 05, 2013 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A13A2477. COLLIN MITCHELL v. LINDA LEWIS JOHNSON. Collin Mitchell obtained a default judgment against Linda Lewis Johnson, who moved to set aside the judgment based upon lack of service. The trial court granted the motion on April 4, 2013. Mitchell filed a motio

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-06-570 CV

04/12/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 13, 2024 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BRITTANY LINDA LOU DAVIS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lincoln County No. 21-CR-65 Forest A. Durard, Jr., Judge No. M2023-00225-CCA-R3-CD

People v Lewis (2019 NY Slip Op 08878) People v Lewis 2019 NY Slip Op 08878 Decided on December 11, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

Opinion filed August 5, 2021 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-19-00249-CV __________ NORMAN L. AGNEW, Appellant V. LINDA GONZALES, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the 32nd District Court Mitch

Matter of Xierra N. (Lewis N.) (2024 NY Slip Op 01927) Matter of Xierra N. (Lewis N.) 2024 NY Slip Op 01927 Decided on April 10, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia

WILSON, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Adam Isaac Lewis alleges that his obligation to pay alimony to his ex-wife Karen Conway Lewis should be terminated because Karen is cohabiting or in a de facto marriage with her longtime boyfriend. Adam's complaint to terminate alimony proceeded to trial, and after Adam rested his case, the chancellor found that he had not met his burden of proof and dismissed his complaint pursuant to Miss

903 F.Supp. 1415 (1995) Bobbie L. MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. COFFEY COUNTY HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants. No. 93-4081-RDR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 25, 1995. *1416 *1417 *1418 *1419 James L. Wisler,

OPINION OF THE COURT EDWARD R. BECKER, Circuit Judge. Eight voters who reside in the newly created 44th state senatorial district in eastern Pennsylvania brought this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging a violation of the Equal Protection Clause. They claim that the 1991 Pennsylvania Reapportionment Plan, and the consequent “assignment” of Senator Frank Pécora (who was elected to the Senate in 1990 from

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any Oct 03 2019, 9:40 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of Appeal

Matter of Linda S.M. v Demetrius W. (2018 NY Slip Op 02623) Matter of Linda S.M. v Demetrius W. 2018 NY Slip Op 02623 Decided on April 18, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Repor

FILED Feb 04 2025, 8:56 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

Filed 7/24/23 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO NICOLE WOODWORTH, Plaintiff and Appellant, E072704 v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVDS1408640) LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY OPINION MEDICAL CENTER,

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 22-1499 _______________ MS. LINDA MIGLIORI; FRANCIS J. FOX; RICHARD E. RICHARDS; KENNETH RINGER; SERGIO RIVAS, Appellants v. ZACHARY COHEN, Intervenor – Plaintiff v. LEHIGH C

11/04/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 10, 2024 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BRIAN TREMAINE MITCHELL Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2021-B-924 Steve R. Dozier, Judge ___________________________________

292 S.W.3d 614 (2009) Linda STRINGFIELD, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent. No. WD 70814. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. September 29, 2009. Linda Stringfield, Acting Pro Se, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Rachel M. Lewis, Esq., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, C.J, JAMES EDWARD WELSH,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT GIBSON, District Judge. I. SYNOPSIS This matter comes before the Court on a motion for summary judgment filed by the Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. ECF No. 31. For the reasons that follow, that motion will be granted in part and denied in part. II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Danie

Opinion issued April 21, 2011 In The Court of Appeals For The

OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. At the heart of this dispute is the claim that the City of Memphis, several of its agencies and several of its police officers violated the substantive due process rights of Daniel Mitchell when they permitted a police officer to loan a personal vehicle to an informant who subsequently collided with — and killed — Mitchell wh

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 16a0281p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ GENESIS HILL, ┐ Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, │