⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

8 opinions for “Linda M. Fendell”

Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012-10-11 · Published · cited 0× · 292 P.3d 1172; 2012 COA 172; 2012 WL 4829559; 2012 Colo. App. LEXIS 1651
Opinion by Judge FURMAN. {1 Plaintiffs, the Board of County Commissioners of Gilpin County, Forrest Whitman, Bruce V. Schmalz, and Connie MeLain (collectively, Gilpin County), and defendant, the City of Black Hawk (Black Hawk), appeal the district court's order dismissing their claims against defendants, the Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission (Commission), the Colorado Division of Gaming (Division
Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998-04-20 · Published · cited 11× · 956 P.2d 1260; 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1836; 1998 Colo. LEXIS 335; 1998 WL 191824
956 P.2d 1260 (1998) CHATFIELD EAST WELL COMPANY, LTD., Applicant-Appellant, v. CHATFIELD EAST PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION; The State and Division Engineers for Water Division No. 1; George McMakin; Ronald Ralph Martinez; Verna A. Pope; Valentine and Gloria Poljanec; Thomas G. Bettinger; Kenneth Stramel and Marcia Thomas-Stramel; Keith and Valerie A. Lehmann; Loye and Dawna Williams; Frederick S. Walz; John and Valorie Havercamp; David and Jennet
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002-03-11 · Published · cited 0× · 110 Wash. App. 524
Agid, C.J. — Linda Damon and the Washington Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) appeal from an order granting the Tatitlek Native Village’s CR 60(b) motion to vacate a prior court order which allowed Damon to revoke her consent to the relinquishment of her parental rights. Damon gave birth to M.D. in April 1998. About three months later, Damon voluntarily relinquished her parental rights to M.D. and DSHS filed a petit
Washington Supreme Court · 2003-02-06 · Published · cited 61× · 148 Wash. 2d 654; 63 P.3d 125; 2003 Wash. LEXIS 75
Ireland, J. Basil and Ruth Denaxas (collectively Seller) brought this action against Sandstone Court of Bellevue, L.L.C., assignee of Singleton Associates1 (collectively Purchaser), for failure to pay on a promissory note in a real estate transaction. Purchaser counterclaimed against Seller and filed third party claims against Kidder, Mathews & Segner (Realtor)2 and P
In Re MDpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002-03-11 · Published · cited 3× · 42 P.3d 424
42 P.3d 424 (2002) 110 Wash.App. 524 In re the Dependency of M.D., a minor. State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services and Linda Damon, Appellants, v. Native Village Of Tatitlek and Casa, Respondents. No. 48813-9-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. March 11, 2002. *428 Cath
Washington Supreme Court · 2003-02-06 · Published · cited 30× · 63 P.3d 125
63 P.3d 125 (2003) 148 Wash.2d 654 Basil DENAXAS and Ruth Denaxas, husband and wife, Petitioners, v. SANDSTONE COURT OF BELLEVUE, L.L.C., Respondent, Kidder, Mathews & Segner Inc., a Washington Corporation, James Klinger and Jane Doe Klinger, husband and wife and the marital community composed thereof, Third Party Defendants, and Pacific Northwest Title Company of Washington, Inc., Third Party Petitioner.<
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005-01-18 · Published · cited 270× · 105 P.3d 595; 2005 Colo. LEXIS 33; 2005 WL 100855
Justice RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. Plaintiff-Appellants, Park County Sportsmen’s Ranch, LLP (“PCSR”), Kenneth J. Burke (PCSR’s attorney at trial), and the City of Aurora, appeal from a judgment of the District Court for Water Division 1 dismissing PCSR’s water rights application and awarding attorney fees and costs to objectors *603who su
Washington Supreme Court · 1984-11-06 · Published · cited 121× · 691 P.2d 524; 102 Wash. 2d 874
Utter, J. (dissenting) — I dissent from the majority's conclusion that this court should not review its holding reached in Chemical Bank v. WPPSS, 99 Wn.2d 772, 666 P.2d 329 (1983). The provisions of RAP 2.5(c)(2) clearly authorize reconsideration. The appellate court may at the instance of a party review the propriety of an earlier decision of the appellate court in the same case and, where ju