Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Linda Marie Harris”
State v. Harrispublic domain
KOBLITZ, P.J.A.D. *39After a December 2011 drug-related shooting of two men, a jury convicted defendant James Harris of two counts of first-degree murder, N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3(a)(1) or (2) ; second-degree unlawful possession of a handgun, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-5(b) ; and second-degree possession of a weapon for an unlawful purpose, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-4(a). The
McKusick, Linda Mariepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-81,540-01 EX PARTE LINDA MARIE McKUSICK, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1415839-A IN THE 183RD DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY Per curiam. OPINION Pursuant to the provisions of Artic
Frank Ray Baggett v. Anne Marie Baggettpublic domain
OPINION CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., P.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which JOHN W. McCLARTY and THOMAS R. FRIERSON, II, JJ., joined. This is the divorce case of Frank Ray Baggett (“Husband”) and Anne Marie Baggett (“Wife”). After eight years of marriage, Wife sued Husband for divorce. The foll
United States v. Kenneth L. Harrispublic domain
CARNES, Chief Judge: Kenneth Harris was convicted of three counts of Hobbs Act robbery and four other counts relating to his possession and use of firearms during those robberies. Because he had prior convictions for other violent crimes, he was sentenced to life imprisonment and consecutive prison terms totaling 57 years. Harris ap
Spaulding v. Harrispublic domain
914 N.E.2d 820 (2009) Linda SPAULDING and Tammy Spaulding, Individually and as Personal Representatives for the Estate of Mattie Spaulding, Deceased, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. Erinn R. HARRIS, M.D. and Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County d/b/a Wishard Memorial Hospital, Appellees-Defendants. No. 49A02-0810-CV-954. Court of Appeals of Indiana. October 8, 2009.
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 23, 2006 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 23, 2006. In The
Maranda ODonnell v. Harris County, Texas, epublic domain
EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: *534 Maranda ODonnell and other plaintiffs (collectively, "ODonnell") brought a class action suit against Harris County, Texas, and a number of its officials-including County Judges, 1 Hearing O
Lewis v. Harrispublic domain
908 A.2d 196 (2006) MARK LEWIS and DENNIS WINSLOW; SAUNDRA HEATH and CLARITA ALICIA TOBY; CRAIG HUTCHISON and CHRIS LODEWYKS; MAUREEN KILIAN and CINDY MENEGHIN; SARAH and SUYIN LAEL; MARILYN MANEELY and DIANE MARINI; and KAREN and MARCYE NICHOLSON-MCFADDEN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GWENDOLYN L. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Human Services; CLIFTON R. LACY, in his official capacity as the Commiss
Kerr v. Harris Countypublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 292 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 293 MEMORANDUM OPINION ON REHEARING Edward A. and Norma Kerr, together with approximately
Harris v. Dist. Ct. (Figueroa)public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA RONALD DAVID HARRIS, No. 85304 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LED CLARK; THE HONORABLE LINDA
OPINION ON REHEARING JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice The heirs, devisees, and assigns of Robert Lindsay and June C. Harris 1 (Appellants) filed a motion for rehearing. We grant the motion, withdraw our December 30, 2016 opinion and judgment, and substitute the following opinion and a co
Linda M. Smith v. Mary Davispublic domain
Order filed November 10, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-15-00652-CV ____________ LINDA M. SMITH, Appellant V. MARY DAVIS, Appellee On Appeal from the 269th District Court
United States v. Harrispublic domain
617 A.2d 189 (1992) UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Kevin L. HARRIS, Appellee. No. 92-CO-211. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued September 25, 1992. Decided November 30, 1992. Mary-Patrice Brown, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., John R. Fisher, John F. Cox, III, and Linda Otani McKinney, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington,
Harris v. City of Houstonpublic domain
10 F.Supp.2d 721 (1997) John HARRIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF HOUSTON, Defendant. No. Civ.A. H-96-3621. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. November 20, 1997. *722 Ronald D. Secrest, Beck Redden and Secrest, Houston, TX, for John D. Harris, Thomas Phillips, Mary Almendarez, Harris County Utility
Reversed and Rendered in Part and Remanded in Part and Opinion filed April 3, 2008 Reversed and Rendered in Part and Remanded in Part and Opinion filed April 3, 2008. In The
Linda M. Smith v. Mary Davispublic domain
Order filed October 5, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-15-00652-CV ____________ LINDA M. SMITH, Appellant V. MARY DAVIS, Appellee On Appeal from the 269th District Court
Opinion issued March 7, 2013. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-11-00014-CV ——————————— HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellants V. EDWARD A. AND NORMA KERR, PATTIE ACKERM
Smestad v. Harrispublic domain
CROTHERS, Justice. [¶ 1] Bruce G. Harris appeals a district court judgment awarding Linda A. Smes-tad $30,025 plus interest on the theory of unjust enrichment. Harris argues the district court erred by (1) deciding the issue remanded without notifying Harris or holding a hearing, (2) considering unjust enrichment because Smestad’s complaint did not include an unjust enrichment claim and (3) finding Smestad proved unjust enri
Smestad v. Harrispublic domain
CROTHERS, Justice. [¶ 1] Bruce G. Harris appeals from a judgment awarding Linda A. Smestad $30,025 plus interest for loans Smestad claimed she made to Harris during their 18-month relationship. We conclude the district court’s findings that an oral agreement existed between the parties for Harris to repay Smestad $30,025 for the loans and that Harris failed to prove his counterclaims are not clearly erroneous. However, we fu
State of Iowa v. Hannah Marie Kilbypublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–0734 Submitted October 15, 2020—Filed June 18, 2021 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. HANNAH MARIE KILBY, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, William A. Price, Judge. A defendant appeals her conviction for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, arguing that the district court erred by allowing evidence that she refused a breath test.