⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Linda Potter”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008-04-09 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-1646 ___________ Linda L. Lyons, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the
Potter v. Brenpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014-08-28 · Published · cited 0× · 576 F. App'x 1010
ORDER PER CURIAM. On July 24, 2014, this court dismissed-in-part and affirmed-in-part the above-captioned appeals. Mr. Potter has now filed a “Motion for an Order to Show Cause,” a “Motion to Challenge Jurisdiction in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,” and a “Motion for Relief from Judgment.” To the extent that Mr. Potter is seeking reconsideration of this
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015-03-03 · Published · cited 0× · 594 F. App'x 199
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: D. Sidney Potter seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing some, but not all, claims in his employment discrimination action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral or
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015-11-19 · Published · cited 0× · 622 F. App'x 269
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: D. Sidney Potter appeals the district court’s order dismissing this case under Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v), 47(b) for failure to prosecute. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Potter’s inf
Wright v. Potterpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2010-05-24 · Published · cited 0× · 176 L. Ed. 2d 1242; 2010 U.S. LEXIS 4173; 130 S. Ct. 3352; 560 U.S. 936; 78 U.S.L.W. 3688
Petition for rehearing denied. Former decision, 559 U.S. 1042, 130 S. Ct. 2075, 176 L. Ed. 2d 424, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2801.
Potter v. McLearypublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court · 2009-07-31 · Published · cited 96× · 774 N.W.2d 1; 484 Mich. 397
774 N.W.2d 1 (2009) 484 Mich. 397 Brian POTTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard C. McLEARY, M.D., Gary Augustyn, M.D., St. Joseph Mercy Hospital Ann Arbor, d/b/a Trinity Health-Michigan, Robert Domeier, D.O., and Emergency Physicians Medical Group, P.C., Defendants, and Kristyn H. Murry, M.D., and Huron Valley Radiology, P.C., Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 136336. Calendar No. 7.
Wright v. Potterpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2010-03-29 · Published · cited 0× · 176 L. Ed. 2d 424; 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2801; 130 S. Ct. 2075; 559 U.S. 1042; 78 U.S.L.W. 3565
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Same case below, 350 Fed. Appx. 898.
Lyons v. Potterpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008-04-09 · Published · cited 23× · 521 F.3d 981; 20 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 917; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 7523; 2008 WL 942275
521 F.3d 981 (2008) Linda L. LYONS, Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service; Peggy Beck, Appellees. No. 07-1646. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: December 13, 2007. Filed: April 9, 2008. *982 David C. Knieriem, argued, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.<
Taylor v. Potterpublic domain
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005-01-25 · Published · cited 1× · 355 F. Supp. 2d 817; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2470; 2005 WL 310520
355 F.Supp.2d 817 (2005) Ruby Linda TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General; Gail Hall, Manager, Human Resources; and Stephen Bushelman, Manager, Human Resources, Defendants. No. CIV.1:04CV00644. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. January 25, 2005. Ruby Linda Taylor, Pleasant Garden, NC, pro se.
Randall v. Potterpublic domain
District Court, D. Maine · 2005-02-09 · Published · cited 2× · 366 F. Supp. 2d 104; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2335; 2005 WL 758171
366 F.Supp.2d 104 (2005) Linda RANDALL, Plaintiff, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant. No. CV-03-135-B-W. United States District Court, D. Maine. February 9, 2005. *105 *106 Arthur J. Greif, Gilbert & Greif, P.A., Bangor, Martha S. Temple, Temple
Randall v. Potterpublic domain
District Court, D. Maine · 2005-02-09 · Published · cited 6× · 366 F. Supp. 2d 120; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2336; 2005 WL 758172
366 F.Supp.2d 120 (2005) Linda RANDALL, Plaintiff, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant. No. CV-03-135-B-W. United States District Court, D. Maine. February 9, 2005. *121 Arthur J. Greif, Gilbert & Greif, P.A., Bangor, ME, Martha S. Temple, Temple Law Offices, PA, Hampden, ME, Julie D
Allen v. Potterpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004-09-08 · Published · cited 5× · 115 F. App'x 854
ORDER Linda S. Allen appeals the district court’s dismissal of her action alleging discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. For the reasons set forth in the following order, we affirm the judgment of the district court. A. Ms. Allen is an African-American employee of the United States Postal Service. O
Bragg v. Potterpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004-02-09 · Published · cited 0× · 92 F. App'x 342
ORDER Former mail carrier Majoria Bragg sued the United States Postal Service alleging that she was subjected to a hostile work environment and ultimately fired because she is African American and disabled, and because she had engaged in protected activity. After correctly discerning that Bragg’s claims arise under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to e-17, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
LaComb v. Potterpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992-12-30 · Published · cited 0× · 188 A.D.2d 1019
Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Jefferson County Family Court, Hunt, J. (Appeal from Order of Jefferson County Family Court, Hunt, J. — Custody.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Boehm, JJ.
Humphrey v. Potterpublic domain
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2001-09-14 · Published · cited 0× · 162 F. Supp. 2d 1354; 2001 WL 1097855
162 F.Supp.2d 1354 (2001) Linda HUMPHREY, Plaintiff, v. John E. POTTER,[1] as Postmaster General of the United States, Defendant. No. 99-7621-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. September 14, 2001. *1355 *1356 *1357 Charles Thomas Wh
Willett v. Potterpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001-07-10 · Published · cited 0× · 15 F. App'x 861
ORDER The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule *86231(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
People v. Potterpublic domain
Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998-10-19 · Published · cited 0× · 966 P.2d 1060; 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 5342; 1998 Colo. LEXIS 705; 1998 WL 743656
PER CURIAM. The hearing board in this lawyer discipline case recommended that the respondent, Gary T. Potter, receive a public censure for entering into a prohibited business transaction with a client. A hearing panel of the grievance committee approved the board’s findings and recommendation. We accept the recommendations of the board and panel and publicly censure the respondent. I.
People v. Potterpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-02-17 · Published · cited 5× · 138 N.Y.S.3d 878; 191 A.D.3d 903; 2021 NY Slip Op 01071
People v Potter (2021 NY Slip Op 01071) People v Potter 2021 NY Slip Op 01071 Decided on February 17, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Newsome v. Potterpublic domain
Albany City Court · 1985-06-14 · Published · cited 1× · 128 Misc. 2d 779; 491 N.Y.S.2d 257; 1985 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2995
OPINION OF THE COURT Morton M. Z. Lynn, J. The plaintiff brings this small claims proceeding to recover rent she paid to the defendant for an apartment she never occupied. The action appears to be one in contract for a liquidated sum of money. It would seem that if the defendant did not appear on the return date, the plaintiff should be entitled to recover a default judgment. In fact, a
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025-01-29 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 Ark. App. 45
Cite as 2025 Ark. App. 45 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-24-203 LINDA MICHAEL Opinion Delivered January 29, 2025 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION V. COMMISSION BOONEVILLE SCHOOL