⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Lindsey Margaret Miller”

Hill v. Millerpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024-01-31 · Published · cited 0×
386 January 31, 2024 No. 48 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON DAVID L. HILL, JR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jamie MILLER, Snake River Correctional Center, Defendant-Respondent. Malheur County Circuit Court 21CV06055; A177440 Lung S. Hung, Judge. Argued and submitted October 31, 2023. Mar
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2019-03-07 · Published · cited 1× · 264 So. 3d 758
KITCHENS, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶1. In 2013, Lauderdale County contracted with Norman Enterprises, Inc., a roofing company, to repair the roof of the Ulmer Building in Meridian, Mississippi. George Waltman, an employee of Norman Enterprises, fell through the roof while performing work. Waltman sued Engineering Plus, Inc., the project engineer, claiming it should have warned
Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2017-02-03 · Published · cited 22× · 53 Kan. App. 2d 505; 390 P.3d 56; 2017 WL 461213; 2017 Kan. App. LEXIS 14
Hill, J.: This is an appeal by Murray & Sons Construction Company of the trial court’s holding that it had breached an implied-in-fact contract with Lindsey Masonry Company by not paying for all of die services performed. Along with the contract payments, the trial court awarded interest, costs, and attorney fees as authorized by the Kansas Fairness in Public Construction Contracts Act. Our review of the extensive record le
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023-07-21 · Published · cited 24× · 75 F.4th 215
USCA4 Appeal: 21-4367 Doc: 94 Filed: 07/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 26 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-4367 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MONTES TERELL MILLER, a/k/a Tripp, a/k/a Montes Terrel Miller,
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015-03-09 · Published · cited 0× · 82 F. Supp. 3d 797; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28564; 2015 WL 1089440
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SHARON JOHNSON COLEMAN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Shannon Volling and Allen Springer filed a seven-count complaint against corporate defendants Antioch Rescue Squad (“ARS”) and Kurtz Paramedic Service, Inc. (“Kurtz”), alleging claims of retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (Counts I and II), the Illinois Human Rights Act (Counts III
Savoy v. Millerpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025-12-31 · Published · cited 0× · 346 Or. App. 134
134 December 31, 2025 No. 1134 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON ROBERT GODEAUZ SAVOY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jamie MILLER, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Defendant-Respondent. Malheur County Circuit Court 19CV19835; A176626 J. Burdette Prat
People v. Lindseypublic domain
Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974-11-07 · Published · cited 3× · 224 N.W.2d 273; 56 Mich. App. 458; 1974 Mich. App. LEXIS 745
56 Mich. App. 458 (1974) 224 N.W.2d 273 PEOPLE v. LINDSEY Docket No. 18670. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided November 7, 1974. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, James K. Miller, Prosecuting Attorney, and Donald A. Johnston, III, Chief Appellate Attorney, for the people.</
Ohio Supreme Court · 2016-11-16 · Published · cited 17× · 2016 Ohio 7742; 148 Ohio St. 3d 192; 69 N.E.3d 711
Kennedy, J., dissenting. {¶ 26} Because the contract at issue here is not susceptible of more than one reasonable interpretation, I dissent. The contract prohibits the use of the insured’s testimony as “independent corroborative evidence” of a no-contact accident, permitting only independent evidence as the “additional evidence” necessary for coverage for a no-contact accident under the insured’s uninsu
District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1989-12-04 · Published · cited 0× · 133 F.R.D. 548; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19164; 1990 WL 205158
MEMORANDUM OPINION MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, District Judge. Between 1975 and 1988, Gene Flannes served as manager of the corporate defendants’ branch office in Hot Springs, Arkansas. Flannes promised plaintiffs that he would place their money in securities or other investments, but instead converted their funds to personal use. After Flannes disappeared from Hot Springs in 1988, plaintiffs filed this suit
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2020-11-06 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS JERALD BLAGG, FILED Claimant Below, Petitioner November 6, 2020 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK vs.) No. 19-0469 (BOR Appeal No. 2053726) SUPREM
King v. the Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016-03-30 · Published · cited 0× · 336 Ga. App. 531; 784 S.E.2d 875; 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 216
MILLER, Presiding Judge, concurring specially. I fully concur in the majority’s opinion in Divisions 1 (b), 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. I write separately, however, because I disagree with the majority’s conclusion in Division 1 (a) that the photo array was not impermissibly suggestive. After a review of the record, I find that the photo array used in this case was very troubling and unduly sugges
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2017-12-04 · Published · cited 3× · 577 B.R. 142
OPINION Matter Before the Court ROSEMARY GAMBARDELLA, BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court is a Motion to Reopen Chapter 11 Case For The Limited Purpose of Enforcing the Chapter 11 Plan Discharge and Injunction filed by GEO Specialty Chemical Inc. and GEO Specialty Chemicals, Ltd. (collectively “GEO” or the “Reorganized Debtors”
Culpepper v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980-10-22 · Published · cited 4× · 274 S.E.2d 616; 156 Ga. App. 331; 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2966
The appellant and the co-defendant, an employee of the City of Hartwell, Georgia, were indicted on 72 counts of theft by taking. After a joint trial, appellant was convicted on 57 counts while his co-defendant was acquitted on all counts. The state's evidence showed that appellant presented invoices from three non-existent chemical companies to the co-defendant and received payment for chemical products which were never received by the city. Appellant's principal enumeration of
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016-01-05 · Published · cited 0× · 184 So. 3d 312; 2016 Miss. App. LEXIS 3; 2016 WL 43735
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CA-00832-COA ASHLEY DARVILLE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON APPELLANT BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF CAROL DARVILLE v. HECTOR MEJIA APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/09/2014 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JANNIE M. LEWIS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HOLMES COU
Oregon Supreme Court · 2026-06-04 · Published · cited 0× · 375 Or. 376
376 June 4, 2026 No. 29 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Adverse Party, v. DAVID AYON-URBANO, Defendant-Relator. DAVID AYON-URBANO, Plaintiff-Relator, v. META PLATFORMS, INC., Def
Oregon Supreme Court · 2026-06-04 · Published · cited 1× · 375 Or. 376
376 June 4, 2026 No. 29 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Adverse Party, v. DAVID AYON-URBANO, Defendant-Relator. DAVID AYON-URBANO, Plaintiff-Relator, v. META PLATFORMS, INC., Def
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2023-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 Ark. 67
Cite as 2023 Ark. 67 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered: April 20, 2023 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2023 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2023 annual attorney-license fee was April 17, 2023.1 As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, attached
Leech v. 3M Co.public domain
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2017-09-30 · Published · cited 1× · 278 F. Supp. 3d 933
SECTION: “G”(4) ORDER NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Margaret Leech’s (“Leech”) “Motion to Remand to State Court.”1 Having considered the motion, the memoranda in support and in opposition, the record, and the applicable law, the Court will deny the motion. I. Background <
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2024-12-05 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 05-DEC-2024 08:39 AM Dkt. 90 SO NO. CAA