⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

17 opinions for “Lindsey v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.”

District Court, S.D. New York · 2011-09-30 · Published · cited 13× · 822 F. Supp. 2d 368; 2011 WL 4529640
OPINION & ORDER SIDNEY H. STEIN, District Judge. Plaintiffs in these four actions are members of the putative classes in In re Citigroup, Inc. Bond Litigation and In re Citigroup, Inc. Securities Litigation that have opted to bring suit in their own name. They are investors in the securities of defendant Citigroup, Inc., and they allege that the company, and certain of its
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2018-06-12 · Published · cited 9× · 587 B.R. 25
Sontchi, J. INTRODUCTION 2 Before the Court is a sua sponte Order wherein the parties were asked to brief three issues, i.e. , whether the Proceeding should be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, if the Court should abstain from hearing the Proceeding, or if the Court should remand the Proceeding to state court.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014-07-02 · Published · cited 11× · 512 B.R. 584
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON (A) MOTION OF CITI-MORTGAGE, INC. FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY AND (B) MOTIONS FOR DISMISSAL OF, OR ABSTENTION FROM, ADVERSARY PROCEEDING JOHN E. HOFFMAN, JR., Bankruptcy Judge. I. Introduction For several years, Daniel and Christine Junk have been engaged in foreclosure litigation that began after they stopped making payments on their mort
McBeth v. Porgespublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-03-21 · Published · cited 28× · 171 F. Supp. 3d 216; 2016 WL 1092692; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36251
*221OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge Approximately five years ago, Plaintiff Donald F. McBeth invested $5 million in a hedge fund called Spectra Opportunities Fund LLC (the “Spectra Fund” or “Fund”). Within ten months, the Fund had lost all of its assets — including McBeth’s entire investment. Crying foul, McBeth now bri
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023-05-22 · Published · cited 0×
20-3559-cv The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Equitas Insurance Limited UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2022 Argued: December 1, 2022 Decided: May 22, 2023 Docket No. 20-3559-cv THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA,
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-10-31 · Published · cited 23× · 317 F.R.D. 426; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150528; 2016 WL 6426409
OPINION & ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge; Plaintiffs The Dial Corporation, Henkel Consumer Goods, Inc., Kraft Heinz Foods Company f/k/a H.J. Heinz Company, Foster Poultry Farms, BEF Foods Inc., Smithfield Foods Inc., and HP Hood LLC (the “Plaintiffs”), representing a class of non-retailer consumer packaged-goods firms in the United States (the “Class” or “Class Members”), seek final approv
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018-12-20 · Published · cited 26× · 574 S.W.3d 444
Terry Jennings, Justice Appellants, Robert Kubbernus and Balaton Group, Inc. ("Balaton") (collectively, "appellants"), challenge the trial court's judgment, entered after a jury trial, in favor of appellees, ECAL Partners, Ltd., Draco Capital, Inc., Robert Mendel, as assignee of Edward Pascal, Robert Mendel, Robert Mendel, as assignee of Stanley Beraznik, Robert Mendel, as assignee of Don Bui, Robert Mendel, as assignee of Ben Ari
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017-04-27 · Published · cited 31× · 450 N.J. Super. 1; 160 A.3d 44
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-0963-12T1 FAIRFAX FINANCIAL HOLDINGS LIMITED and CRUM & FORSTER HOLDINGS CORP., APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiffs-Appellants/ April 27, 2017 Cross-Respondents,
District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2012-03-21 · Published · cited 19× · 472 B.R. 387; 2012 WL 967056; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39656
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER AMUL R. THAPAR, District Judge. Location matters. When King Leonidas and the Greeks chose to make their stand at Thermopylae, the narrow mountain pass “largely neutralize^]” the Persians’ strong cavalry and enabled the Greek force to inflict massive casualties on a Persian army more than twenty times its size. See Ben Dupré, Where History Was Made: Landmarks of
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011-09-29 · Published · cited 11× · 865 F. Supp. 2d 545; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112292; 2011 WL 4526040
OPINION WOLFSON, District Judge: This consolidated shareholder derivative action arises out of allegations that essentially accuse certain former and current officers and directors of nominal defendant company Johnson & Johnson (“J & J”) of breaching their fiduciary duties by permitting and fostering a culture of systematic, calculated and widespread legal violations. In that sense, in the Consolidat
District Court, E.D. New York · 2008-09-05 · Published · cited 22× · 253 F.R.D. 69; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71037
MEMORANDUM & ORDER MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: *71Table of Contents I. Introduction.............................................................75 A. Overview............................................................75 B. Plaintiffs’ C
In re Nexiumpublic domain
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013-09-11 · Published · cited 43× · 968 F. Supp. 2d 367; 2013 WL 4832176; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129696
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION A group of wholesale drug distributors (the “Direct Purchasers”) and health and welfare benefit funds (the “End-Payors” 1) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, brings this multidistrict, putative class action against AstraZeneca AB, Akt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-03-20 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 01717
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di
District Court, D. Maine · 2018-08-15 · Published · cited 21× · 332 F. Supp. 3d 1101
SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge Table of Contents I. Introduction...1116 II. Background...1117 A. Securitization...1117 B. Historical Background...1117 C. The Client Contract and the Client Guide...1118 1. Section 113: General Rules of Interpretation...1119
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-09-12 · Published · cited 16× · 339 F. Supp. 3d 262
[Regarding Application of the Court's Prior Rulings on Manifestation, Incidental Damages (Lost Time), and Unjust Enrichment to All Remaining Jurisdictions in Dispute (MDL Order No. 131 Issues) ] JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION... 274 LEGAL STANDARDS... 275 DISCUSSION... 275 A. Manifestation... 276
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2005-02-16 · Published · cited 26× · 511 F. Supp. 2d 742; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4494
511 F.Supp.2d 742 (2005) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority, Plaintiff, v. Murtha Cullina, LLP, et al., Defendants. Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth L. Lay, et al., Defendants. Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority, Plaintiff, v