Cases

PIERCE, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, we consider whether the “status quo” provision of Section 6 of the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 156 (1982) (Act), prevents a carrier and a union1 from agreeing upon the rates of pay, rules, and working conditions that are to be in effect during a contract renegotiation period even though they may differ from those in effect immediately prior to the expirat

38 B.R. 67 (1984) In re CONTINENTAL AIRLINES CORPORATION, Debtor. In re CONTINENTAL AIR LINES, INC., Debtor. In re TEXAS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES, INC., Debtor. In re TXIA HOLDINGS CORPORATION, Debtor. Bankruptcy Nos. 83-04019-H2-5, 80-04020-H1-5, 83-04021-H3-5, and 83-04022-H3-5. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. January 17, 1984.

64 B.R. 882 (1986) In re CONTINENTAL AIRLINES CORPORATION, Continental Air Lines, Inc., Texas International Airlines, Inc., TXIA Holdings Corporation. Bankruptcy Nos. 83-04019-H2-5, 83-04020-H1-5, 83-04021-H3-5 and 83-04022-H3-5. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas. June 27, 1986. *883 *884 Joh

OPINION SMITH, Circuit Judge. I. Introduction This suit was brought in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey by Wal-Mart cleaning crew members who are seeking compensation for unpaid overtime and certification of a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), civil damages under RICO, and damages

790 F.Supp.2d 590 (2011) MURRIEL-DON COAL COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. ASPEN INSURANCE UK LIMITED, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 11-23-ART. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Southern Division. Pikeville. May 20, 2011. *592 Gary C. Johnson, Rhonda Jennings Blackburn, Gary C. Johnson, P.S.C., Pikeville, KY, Henry G. Jone

Siddoway, C.J. ¶1 — The late Allan Parmelee, while incarcerated in the Washington State Penitentiary, persuasively argued to the Washington Supreme Court that public record requestors like himself are necessary parties when third parties seek to enjoin agencies from responding to requests under the Public Records Act (PRA), chapter 42.56 RCW. As a result, two cases that Washington De

765 F.2d 377 119 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3073, 103 Lab.Cas. P 11,548 AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., Defendant-Appellant,FLIGHT ENGINEERS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, PAA CHAPTER,AFL-CIO, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 876, Docket 85-7048. Un

723 F.Supp. 1214 (1989) Frank J. KELLEY, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, ex rel., MICHIGAN NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION, Michigan Water Resources Commission, and Gordon E. Guyer, Director of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Plaintiffs, v. ARCO INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, Frederick C. Matthaei, Jr., and Robert P. Ferguson, Defendants, ARCO INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. NORTHWEST COATINGS CORP., a

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 10-2204 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., Defendants, Appellants. ________________________ Nos. 10-2207 & 10-2214 DEAN HARA, Plaintiff, Appellee/Cross-A

On the afternoon of August 23, 1934, a trailer attached to a truck, driven by defendant Soules and belonging to defendant Star Transfer Line, crashed into a car owned and driven by plaintiff. The collision occurred approximately a mile and a quarter northwest from the village of Central Lake, Michigan, at the sharp curve on highway M-88 half-way down a hill about a mile long. Plaintiff had driven his car slowly about half-way up the hill and when he came to the curve and saw the approaching t

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. These appeals present constitutional challenges to section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”), 1 U.S.C. § 7, which denies federal economic and other benefits to same-sex couples lawfully married in Massachusetts and to surviving spouses from couples thus married. Rather than challenging the right of states to define marriage as they see fit, the appeals contest the right of Congress to undercut the

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony (“Daubert Motions”) Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Toyota’s Motion for Summary Judgment JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge. Table of Contents PART ONE: THE MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE.....................................1064 I. Introduction — The

Plaintiff and appellant sought an accounting and injunctive relief. He claims that he and defendant entered into a written undated contract in January, 1937, in which plaintiff agreed to make available to defendant a "program for the sale of annuity and other insurance contracts in connection with the establishment by employers of pension trust plans," and to assist defendant in contacting clients and in any other matters of detail necessary to consummate a plan for a particular client, et ce

Plaintiff Paull was injured while attempting to rescue his mother from a fire caused by an explosion of contaminated kerosene. A carload containing 8,115 gallons of illuminating oil, vaporizing at 131 degrees, and belonging to defendant Cities Service Oil Company at Grand Rapids, was approved by the deputy oil inspector March 8, 1933. Act No. 328, § 28, Pub. Acts. 1931, prohibits the sale of kerosene that will emit a combustible vapor at a temperature of 120 degrees or less Fahrenheit. M

376 Mich. 532 (1965) 138 N.W.2d 343 MOSIER v. CARNEY. SMITH v. KING. DOOD v. MOSHER. Calendar No. 11, Docket No. 50,142. Supreme Court of Michigan. Decided December 7, 1965. *541 Adams & Wade (William E. Wade, of counsel), for plaintiff. Howlett, Hartman

This is an action under the Uniform Warehouse Receipts Act, Code 1940, Tit. 2, §§ 504-567, brought by appellant against appellees Robert G. Allison, doing business as Allison Coal Transfer Warehouse, and Maryland Casualty Company, a corporation, as surety on Allison's public warehouseman's bond, to recover for the loss of certain household goods, personal property and effects stored by appellant with appellee Allison, as warehouseman, and which were not returned to appellant by appell

Bouldin, J., delivered the opinion of the court. This case is before us on a writ of error to a judgment of the Circuit court of Madison county, at a special term thereof, held in August 1870, in an action on the case brought by the appellant against the appellees, to recover damages for injury alleged by the appellant to have been done to his land by a dam alleged by him to have been illegally erected across t

SAMUELS, J. These two cases being, substantially, between the same parties, in regard to the same property, and depending upon the same facts, were heard together in this court. Many of the facts are set forth in the case of Evans & wife v. Spurgin, 6 Graft. 107. The judgment in that case determined that the better right at law was in the demandants. After the judgment the tenant Spurgin and others, the heirs at law of Lantz

DANIEL J. The decree of the Circuit court, in so far as it sustains the deed of trust of the 30th of May 1842, is, I think, correct. The fact that a deed of *trust embraces articles which must perish or be consumed in the use, before a sale of them can be made according to the terms of the deed, is not one which, of itself, necessarily shows the deed to have been made with a fraudulent design. The amount, in number or value of