Cases

ORDER ON APPEAL C. ASHLEY ROYAL, Chief Judge. Appellant-Debtors Clifford J. Neal and Lise M. Neal appeal the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Georgia’s order denying Appellants’ motion for reconsideration. In essence, Appellants contend the Bankruptcy Court erred by failing to hold a hearing before entering a final written order that deviated from a prior oral “order.”<

BUCKLEW, District Judge: Santander Consumer USA, Inc., as as-signee of Thor Credit Corp. (“Santander”) appeals the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s order overruling Santander’s objection to the confirmation of Phillip Jefferson Brown’s plan under Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, which proposed that Brown surrender his vehicle under 11 U.S.C.

543 F.3d 1239 (2008) In Re: Rollifee Franklin BARRETT, Jr., Mary Ann Barrett, Debtors. *1240 DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rollifee Franklin Barrett, Jr., Mary Ann Barrett, Defendants-Appellees, Richard Johnson, Cheryll Johnson, Amicus Curiae. Nos. 07-14796, 07-14797. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circui

VINSON, District Judge: This case involves interpretation and application of the so-called “hanging paragraph” in Title 11, United States Code, Section 1325(a)(9), which was added to the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”) by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005. See Pub.L. No. 109-8, 119 Stat. 23 (2005) (“BAPC-PA”).1 Specifically, we are called upon to decide if th

Contested Matter MEMORANDUM OPINION Austin E. Carter, United States Bankruptcy Judge This contested matter comes before the Court on an Objection to Claim by Camille Hope, as trustee in this case. In her objection, the trustee asks the Court to disallow claim number 7-1, filed by Quan-tums Group LLC as agent for MOMA Funding LLC (hereinafter, “MOMA”). The Debtor supports the trustee’s o

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, No. 18-15499 individually and on behalf of the People of the State of California, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 3:17-cv-04929-VC v. CHEVRON CORPORATION; CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.; EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION; BP PLC; BP AMERICA, INC.; ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC; SHELL OIL PRODUCTS COMPANY LLC; CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION; CONOCOPHILL

537 F.3d 1295 (2008) In re: Stephen Michael GRAUPNER, Debtor. Stephen Michael Graupner, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nuvell Credit Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-13657. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. August 6, 2008. Brace W. Luquire, Columbus, GA, for Graupner. Lisa Ritchey Craig, McCullough, Payne, Haan, LLC, Atlanta, GA, Barkley C

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, No. 18-15499 individually and on behalf of the People of the State of California, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 3:17-cv-04929-VC v. CHEVRON CORPORATION; CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.; EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION; BP PLC; BP AMERICA, INC.; SHELL PLC; SHELL OIL PRODUCTS COMPANY LLC; CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION; CONOCOPHILLIPS; CONOCOP

Because I believe the trial judge did not err in refusing to instruct the jury as requested by the defendant, I must respectfully dissent. Punishing a defendant for unintentionally causing the death of another while in the commission of a misdemeanor is not a new legal concept, in either a criminal case or a civil case. For example, in Pippin v. State,19 Ala. App. 384, 387, 97 So. 615<

ACCEPTED 15-25-00028-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/27/2025 4:56 PM NO. 15-25-00028-CV-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE