⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Lisa F Sawyer”

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018-06-19 · Published · cited 1× · 892 F.3d 558
15-2276-cr United States v. Sawyer United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term, 2017 Docket No. 15-2276-cr THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JESSE SAWYER,
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018-10-26 · Published · cited 4× · 907 F.3d 121
Chief District Judge Crawford dissents in a separate opinion. Dennis Jacobs, Circuit Judge: *123Jesse Sawyer, having pled guilty to sexual exploitation of children and receipt of child pornography, was originally sentenced primarily to 30 years in prison and a lifetime of supervised release. We ruled that that sentence was shoc
Claudio v. Sawyerpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2009-12-23 · Published · cited 22× · 675 F. Supp. 2d 403; 75 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 655; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120949; 2009 WL 4929260
675 F.Supp.2d 403 (2009) Lisa CLAUDIO, as Administrator of the Estate of Jayson Tirado, deceased, Jaylene Tirado, an infant by her mother and natural guardian, Lisa Claudio, and Irene Tirado, Plaintiffs, v. Sean SAWYER and The City of New York, Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 8994(DC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 23, 2009.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2018-12-20 · Published · cited 0×
The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-17-00051-CV ____________________ LISA GRANGER, Appellant V. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HENRY SAWYER, Appellees ____
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018-10-26 · Published · cited 0×
15‐2276‐cr U.S. v. Sawyer United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2017 No. 15‐2276‐cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
Sawyer v. Colvinpublic domain
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2014-02-03 · Published · cited 1× · 995 F. Supp. 2d 496; 2014 WL 408992; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12894
ORDER TIMOTHY M. CAIN, District Judge. The plaintiff, Kim Eugenia Sawyer (“Sawyer”), brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and § 1383(c)(3), seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her claim for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). (ECF No. 1.) In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2025-02-11 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-757 L Filed: February 11, 2025 ________________________________________ ) 4023 SAWYER ROAD I, LLC, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, )
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 295× · 807 F.3d 239; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 20760; 2015 WL 7729409
BAUER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant, Paul Burritt (“Bur-ritt”), appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, Lisa Ditlefsen (“Ditlefsen”) and Polk County, on all of Burritt’s causes of action, as well as the district court’s denial of his Rule 59(e) motion. Burritt’s complaint advances claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for false arrest and false imprisonment in violation of
In re A.F.public domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023-12-07 · Published · cited 10× · 2023 Ohio 4423
[Cite as In re A.F., 2023-Ohio-4423.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA IN RE A.F., ET AL. : : No. 112918 Minor Children : : [Appeal by Mother, A.A.] :
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001-07-02 · Published · cited 55× · 257 F.3d 780
MURPHY, Circuit J. Sheri Sawyer Madison, a Caucasian women married to an African American man, brought this case against IBP, Inc. (IBP) for sex and race discrimination and harassment, retaliation, and constructive demotion, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et. seq.; 42 U.S.C. § 1981; and the Iowa Civil Rights Act (ICRA), Iowa
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000-04-25 · Published · cited 6× · 204 F.3d 797
204 F.3d 797 (8th Cir. 2000) JOHN E. SEARCY, III, SUI JURIS, APPELLANT,V.JAMES E. DONELSON, I.R.S.; BILL WILDE, I.R.S.; LEE R. MONKS, I.R.S.; JOYCE SHEAD, I.R.S.; NANCY BELLCOCK, I.R.S.; K. J. SAWYER, I.R.S.; JAMES E. GAMBLE, I.R.S.; MAURICE BONDS WHILLOCK, VAN BUREN COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER; LISA NUNLEY, VAN BUREN COUNTY COLLECTOR; VAN BUREN COUNTY, ARKANSAS; DOES, ALL UNKNOWN OTHERS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEES.
Martinez v. Mullenpublic domain
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014-03-28 · Published · cited 0× · 11 F. Supp. 3d 149; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41837; 2014 WL 1315658
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION MICHAEL P. SHEA, District Judge. This case, which involves the State of Connecticut’s regulation of teeth-whitening services provided by non-dentists, illustrates the great deference courts must afford governmental regulation under the doctrine known as “rational basis scrutiny.” The governmental regulation at issue here is a rule that only a licensed dentist may shine a “light emit
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005-06-23 · Published · cited 10× · 703 N.W.2d 486; 267 Mich. App. 111
703 N.W.2d 486 (2005) 267 Mich. App. 111 WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHOREBANK CORPORATION and Standard Federal Bank, N.A., Defendants-Appellees, and Hanna Shina, a/k/a John Shina, and Jaklin Shina, Defendants. Docket No. 254338. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted June 14, 2005, at Detroit. Decided June
Haimdas v. Haimdaspublic domain
District Court, E.D. New York · 2010-07-02 · Published · cited 34× · 720 F. Supp. 2d 183; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66447; 2010 WL 2342377
720 F.Supp.2d 183 (2010) Felicia HAIMDAS, Petitioner, v. Jagmohan HAIMDAS, Respondent. No. 09-CV-02034 (ENV)(MDG). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 8, 2010. Opinion Granting Stay of Judgment July 2, 2010. *187 Caryn Lisa Wolfe, Mark R. Seiden, Michael Dallal, Jonathan Andrew Muenkel, Laura W. Saw
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-02-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TKXRS~ FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS n: r: 12th Court r-f Appeals District KENNETH CRISSUP CAUSE NO
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006-04-20 · Published · cited 10× · 428 F. Supp. 2d 487; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22517; 2006 WL 1050641
428 F.Supp.2d 487 (2006) Dr. Joseph A. CHASE, Jr., et al, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF PORTSMOUTH et al., Defendants. No. 2:05 CV 446. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. April 20, 2006. John Frederick Sawyer, Richard Ennis Biemiller, Samuel Warrenton Meekins, Jr., Wolcott Rivers PC, Virginia Beach, VA, for Plaintiffs. Dean Taylor Buckius
Grady v. Hallpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016-11-22 · Published · cited 0× · 670 F. App'x 828
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tracey Terrell Grady appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district cou
Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997-09-11 · Published · cited 4× · 568 N.W.2d 138; 224 Mich. App. 63
568 N.W.2d 138 (1997) 224 Mich. App. 63 Diane GARA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WOODBRIDGE TAVERN and Miller Brewing Company, Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 192878. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted March 13, 1997, at Detroit. Decided June 6, 1997, at 9:00 a.m. Released for Publication September 11, 1997.
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-12-18 · Published · cited 1× · 67 F. Supp. 3d 619; 2014 WL 7232280
OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION This is a consolidated multi-district litigation (“MDL”) relating to contamination — actual or threatened — of groundwater from various defendants’ use of the gasoline additive methyl tertiary butyl ether (“MTBE”) and/or tertiary butyl alcohol, a product formed by the breakdown of
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-06-11 · Published · cited 1× · 33 F. Supp. 3d 259; 2014 WL 2722002; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80361
OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION This is a consolidated multi-district litigation (“MDL”) relating to contamination — actual or threatened — of groundwater from various defendants’ use of tie gasoline additive methyl tertiary butyl ether (“MTBE”) and/or tertiary butyl alcohol, a product formed by the breakdown of MTBE in water. In this case, the Ne