⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Live Sample”

Supreme Court of Virginia · 2024-02-08 · Published · cited 0×
PRESENT: All the Justices DWAYNE LAMONT SAMPLE, JR. OPINION BY v. Record No. 220445 JUSTICE THOMAS P. MANN FEBRUARY 8, 2024 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Dwayne Lamont Sample, Jr. was found guilty of attempted robbery. Sample assigns error to the trial court’s denial o
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018-09-04 · Published · cited 0×
09/04/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 8, 2018 Session ASHLEY ELIZABETH SAMPLE v. ROBERT SHAYNE SAMPLE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. CC-16-CV-511 Ross H. Hicks, Judge ___________________________________
State v. Samplepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2020-05-11 · Published · cited 5× · 228 A.3d 171; 468 Md. 560
State of Maryland v. Hayes Sample, No. 54, September Term, 2019 MARYLAND RULE 5-901(a) AND (b)(4) – AUTHENTICATING SOCIAL MEDIA EVIDENCE THROUGH CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE – “REASONABLE JUROR” TEST – Court of Appeals held that trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting Facebook-related evidence, as there was sufficient circumstantial evidence under Maryland Rule 5-901(b)(4) for reasonable juror to find that Facebook profiles belonged to defendant, Hayes Sample, and to defendant’s allege
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018-08-27 · Published · cited 15× · 901 F.3d 1196
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. The United States government appeals the sentence of Matthew Sample, following his guilty plea to one count of frauds and swindles under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and two counts of wire fraud under
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2022-01-12 · Published · cited 0×
FILED January 12, 2022 STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WE
Sample v. Colsonpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2013-07-23 · Published · cited 0× · 958 F. Supp. 2d 865; 2013 WL 3822072; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102867
*870ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY JON P. McCALLA, Chief Judge. I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND II. TENNESSEE SUPREME COURT SUMMARY III. THEORIES OF THE CASE IV. BACKGROUND A. Low’s Grocery Robberies, August 7 and 29,1981
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017-04-06 · Published · cited 0×
04/06/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 6, 2016 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. EDWARD SAMPLE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 13-01736 W. Mark Ward, Judge No. W2016-00175-CCA-R3-CD The de
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2021-07-19 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Opinion Filed July 19, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01254-CR ALLEN THOMAS SAMPLE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 196th District Court Hunt County, Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2015-10-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON July 07, 2015 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. EDWARD SAMPLE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 1301735 W. Mark Ward, Judge No. W2014-01583-CCA-R3-CD - Filed October 21, 2015 _____________________________ The defendant, Edward Sample, was convicted of one c
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011-06-27 · Published · cited 0× · 866 F. Supp. 2d 503; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68505; 2011 WL 5517136
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT TERRENCE F. McVERRY, District Judge. Pending before the Court are the MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Document No. 72) filed by Defendant Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. (“Live Nation”) and the MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 76) filed by Defendants Hanover Township and Chief Geho. Defendant Police Officer Julius Zoller has not moved for summary judgment. Defen
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019-11-27 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Nov 27 2019, 11:01 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK court except for the purpose of establishing Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals the defense of res judicata, collateral
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2003-09-19 · Published · cited 1× · 283 F. Supp. 2d 1088; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16697; 2003 WL 22226019
283 F.Supp.2d 1088 (2003) Frederick L. SAMPLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MONSANTO CO., et al., Defendants. No. 4:01CV65 RWS. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. September 19, 2003. *1089 John W. Barrett, Richard R. Barrett, Patrick M. Barrett, Barrett Law Office, Lexington, MS, Thomas F. Crosby, Winters an
Sample v. Hagapublic domain
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2001-12-18 · Published · cited 6× · 824 So. 2d 627; 2001 WL 1610781
824 So.2d 627 (2001) Cassandra SAMPLE, Representative of the Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Mary Alice Sample, Deceased, and Mattie Randel, Representative of the Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of James Williams, Deceased, Appellants, v. Richard HAGA and Pam Haga, Appellees. No. 2000-CA-01991-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. December 18, 2001. Rehearing Deni
District Court, C.D. California · 2012-03-23 · Published · cited 15× · 863 F. Supp. 2d 966; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47768; 2012 WL 1021081
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DR. OWEN R. PHILLIPS [403] DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR CLASS DECERTIFICATION [410] DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DENVER ACTION) [438] DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (LOS ANGELES ACTION) [441] PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR CLASS NOTICE, TO ORDER DEFENDANTS TO PRODUCE CLA
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-01-15 · Published · cited 6× · 287 F. Supp. 3d 400
JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J. Plaintiff Can't Live Without It, LLC ("S'well") has brought six claims against defendant ETS Express, Inc. ("ETS"). ETS manufactures the Force and Swig Bottles, which have the exact same shape as plaintiff's S'well and S'ip Bottles, respectively. ETS has moved for summary judgment dismissing all six of S'well's *404claim
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2003-02-20 · Published · cited 0×
sample v. state COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-01-504-CR JOSHUA ALLEN SAMPLE APPELLANT V.
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2003-02-20 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-01-504-CR JOSHUA ALLEN SAMPLE
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000-05-31 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 99-3475 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v.
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1916-06-12 · Published · cited 0× · 193 Mo. App. 670; 186 S.W. 1125; 1916 Mo. App. LEXIS 68
TRIMBLE, J. This is an action in replevin. Plaintiff was the owner of a pasture in Greenwood county, Kansas, and on August 21,1913, one Wiershing, being the owner and in possession of eighty head of cattle, put them into plaintiff’s possession to he kept on said pasture for the rest of the grazing season for the sum of $240 the owner agreeing not to take the cattle away without first paying the pasturage. At
Sample v. Morganpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984-08-28 · Published · cited 9× · 319 S.E.2d 607; 311 N.C. 717; 1984 N.C. LEXIS 1757
319 S.E.2d 607 (1984) 311 N.C. 717 C. E. SAMPLE t/a Sample Construction Company v. Patrick H. MORGAN and wife, Irene S. Morgan. No. 116A84. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 28, 1984. *608 O.C. Abbott, Elizabeth City, for plaintiff-appellant. Trimpi, Thompson & Nash by C. Everett Thompson,