Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT JORDAN, Circuit Judge. Appellant Lizette Vargas challenges an order from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granting summary judgment against her on her constitutional and state-law claims against the City of Philadelphia (“the City”) and two Philadelphia police officers (collectively, with the

Diaz v Minhas Constr. Corp., LLC (2020 NY Slip Op 06496) Diaz v Minhas Constr. Corp., LLC 2020 NY Slip Op 06496 Decided on November 12, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reportin

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL I Apelación LIZETTE MARTÍNEZ procedente del ORTIZ Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Parte Apelante Sala Superior de

—Appeal from an order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered January 7, 1994, which, inter alia, directed defendant Montefiore to turn over its in-house investigation file to the court for in camera inspection, unanimously dismissed as one taken from a nonappealable order, without costs. *209The order deferring determination of a motion to compel discove

183 F.Supp.2d 486 (2002) Manuel A. BARALT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. CIV.95-2421 (PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 25, 2002. Ruben T. Nigaglioni, James D. Noel-High, McConnell Valdes, San Juan, PR, for Manuel A. Baralt, Lizette Pena-Aviles, Conjugal Partnership Baralt-Pena, Juan Gonzalez-Pere

86 F.Supp.2d 31 (2000) Manuel A. BARALT, Lizette Pena-Aviles, and their marital partnership, Juan Gonzalez-Perez, Monserrate Canabal-Duran, and their marital partnership, Plaintiffs v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE, CO., Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co., Nationwide Life Insurance Co., Nationwide General Insurance Co., Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Co., Nationwide Group of Companies., and William P. De-Meno, Defendants

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Dkt. Nos. 21 & 23) PONSOR, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this one-count class action complaint, Plaintiffs, who own life insurance policies issued by Defendant Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (“MassMutual”) on the lives of persons other than themselves, allege that fo

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 13, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D17-2579 Lower Tribunal No. 15-4112 ________________ Edelmo Escalona Socarras,

Wade v Cojab (2023 NY Slip Op 04230) Wade v Cojab 2023 NY Slip Op 04230 Decided on August 9, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge. A jury found that appellant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”) terminated appellees Manual Baralt and Juan Gonzalez-Perez (“Gonzalez”) because of their ages, in violation of both the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (“ADEA”), and Puerto Rico Law 100, P.R. Laws Ann. tit. 29, §§ 146-51 (“Law 100”). The two men and

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 4, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-1088 Lower Tribunal No. 21-3580 ________________ Jose Fernandez, et al., Appellants,

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 12, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-1088 Lower Tribunal No. 21-3580 ________________ Jose Fernandez, et al., Appellants,

Jaber v Elayyan 2026 NY Slip Op 02253 April 15, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. Juber Jaber, plaintiff-respondent, v Munzer Elayyan, appellant, Farhoud Jaber, nominal defendant-respondent, et al.,

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. This appeal raises the question of whether the Eleventh Amendment prevents a disabled student from suing a state university for damages under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990(ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12165. Iván Toledo, a student at the University of Puerto Rico who has schizoaffective disorder, brought an action under Title II

Opinion and Order SALVADOR E. CASELLAS, U.S. Senior District Judge Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Because the elements necessary to support Plain*121tiffs claims are supported only with inadmissible hearsay and conelusory allegations included in her affidavit, the motion is granted. I. Factua

251 F.3d 10 (1st Cir. 2001) MANUEL A. BARALT; LIZETTE PENA-AVILES; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP BARALT-PENA; JUAN GONZALEZ-PEREZ; MONSERRATE CANABAL-DURAN; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP GONZALEZ-CANABEL, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants,v.NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY; NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY; NATIONWIDE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; NATIONWIDE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPA

394 F.Supp.2d 428 (2005) Juan E. MARTINEZ-BAEZ, et al. Plaintiffs v. Cesar REY-HERNANDEZ, et al. Defendants No. Civ. 02-1503(SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 14, 2005. *429 *430 *431 Hector J. Quijano-Borges, Mendez Mendez & Quij

Escribano Medina, Juez Ponente TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA Comparecen ante nos los recurrentes Caguas Real S. EN C. por A.S.E., et al, solicitando la revisión de una resolución del Departamento de Asuntos del Consumidor (DACO) dictada el 22 de septiembre de 2003, notificada en la misma fecha, en la que se declaró No Ha Lugar a una moción de reconsideración de una resolución distada por DACO el

No. 80149–Agenda 3–September 1997. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. JUAN CORTES, Appellant. Opinion filed January 23, 1998. JUSTICE HARRISON delivered the opinion of the court: Following a jury trial in the circuit court of Cook County, defendant, Juan Cortes, was convicted of four counts of first degree murder (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 38, par. 9–1) and two counts of

692 N.E.2d 1129 (1998) 181 Ill.2d 249 229 Ill.Dec. 918 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Juan CORTES, Appellant. No. 80149. Supreme Court of Illinois. January 23, 1998. Rehearing Denied March 30, 1998. *1132 John J. Hanlon, Asst. State Appellate Defe