⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Lloyd R Fleming”

Fleming v. Currypublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2013-08-20 · Published · cited 14× · 412 S.W.3d 723; 2013 WL 4429905; 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 10438
OPINION TRACY CHRISTOPHER, Justice. In these consolidated appeals, we review the summary judgments granted to several hundred plaintiffs on their breach-of-fiduciary-duty claims against the attorney and law firm that represented them in their personal-injury claims arising from their use of diet drugs. The law firm screened tens of thousands of clients for eligibility to opt out of a class-action settleme
Fleming v. SAIFpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020-03-04 · Published · cited 2× · 302 Or. App. 543; 461 P.3d 261
543 Argued and submitted April 5, 2019, reversed and remanded March 4, 2020 In the Matter of the Compensation of Lloyd R. Fleming, Claimant. Lloyd R. FLEMING, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Treske Precision Machining, Respondents. Workers’ Compensati
People v. Lloydpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1992-03-13 · Published · cited 43× · 4 Cal. App. 4th 724; 6 Cal. Rptr. 2d 105
4 Cal.App.4th 724 (1992) 6 Cal. Rptr.2d 105 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DAVID BRUCE LLOYD, Defendant and Appellant. In re DAVID BRUCE LLOYD on Habeas Corpus. Docket Nos. D013188, D014795. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. March 13, 1992. *727 COUNSEL Stephen
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023-09-27 · Published · cited 18× · 83 F.4th 278
Case: 22-30260 Document: 00516911285 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/27/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED September 27, 2023
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2023-11-07 · Published · cited 0× · 895 S.E.2d 301; 317 Ga. 720
317 Ga. 720 FINAL COPY S23Y0970. IN THE MATTER OF CORY HOWERTON FLEMING. PER CURIAM. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the petition for voluntary discipline filed by Respondent Cory Howerton Fleming (State Bar No. 292955) before the issuance of a formal complaint. See Bar Rule 4-227 (b) (2). In the petition, Fleming admits that during his representation of a client in South Carolina, he violated Rules 1.4 (a) (3), 1.5 (c) (1), 1.7 (a), 1.8 (b), 1.15 (I) (c), 5
Fleming v. Cowardpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2012-08-03 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LLOYD J. FLEMING, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12-0330 (RJL) ) RICHARD COWARD eta!.,
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2024-09-05 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed in Part, Reversed and Remanded in Part, and Opinion Filed September 5, 2024 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00574-CV MRT OF KEMP TX–SNF, LLC, Appellant V. LLOYD DOUGLAS ENTERPRISES, LC AND LLOYD DOUGLAS, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellees On Appeal fr
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2016-11-23 · Published · cited 5× · 222 F. Supp. 3d 529; 2016 WL 6915275; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162253
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DAVID C. GUADERRAMA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this day, the Court considered Plaintiff Blanca Espinoza’s (“Plaintiff’) “Opposed Motion to Remand and Brief in Support” (“Plaintiffs Motion to Remand”) (ECF No. 7), filed on September 1, 2016. Defendant Allstate Texas Lloyd’s (“Defendant”) filed a response (“Defendant’s Response”) (ECF No. 8) on September 8. Plaintiff filed
Fleming v. Tweedypublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-06-08 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED sTATEs I)ISTRICT coURT FoR THE MSTRICT oF CoLUMBIA F I L E D JUN ~8 2011 . ,U.S. D` tr` t& Bankruptcy LLOYD J` FLEMH\IG’ ' C(,¢:)ll°\\r’|t‘s for the|$l)is?crict of Columbia Plaintiff, : , _ ,_ ;- 1- v_ : Civil Action No. 1{)' L) L) OFFICE WALTER W. TWEEDY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court upon consideration of plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011-05-10 · Published · cited 1× · 65 So. 3d 763; 2011 WL 1775859
65 So.3d 763 (2011) Beatrice M. FLEMING v. GARDA SECURITY. No. 10-CA-1021. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. May 10, 2011. *764 Leonard A. Washofsky, Attorney at Law, Metairie, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee. Charles J. Duhe, Jr., Brent Michael Steier, Attorneys at Law, Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendant/Appellant.
People v. Lloydpublic domain
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009-07-09 · Published · cited 75× · 774 N.W.2d 347; 284 Mich. App. 703
774 N.W.2d 347 (2009) PEOPLE v. LLOYD. Docket No. 280373. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted January 6, 2009, at Detroit. Decided July 9, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. *348 Michael A. Cox, Attorney General, B. Eric Restuccia, Solicitor General, Kym L. Worthy, Prosecuting Attorney, and Carolyn
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 566 S.W.3d 410
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2010-11-12 · Published · cited 3× · 751 F. Supp. 2d 1218; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120125; 2010 WL 4683565
751 F.Supp.2d 1218 (2010) FLEMING BUILDING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. 10-CV-432-GKF-TLW. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. November 12, 2010. Kenneth Leonard Brune, Timothy Edward Houchin, Brune Law Firm, Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff. James Donald Johnson, Kerry R. Lewis, Rhodes Hieronymus Jones Tucker &
Montana Supreme Court · 2011-06-08 · Published · cited 4× · 2011 MT 133; 255 P.3d 166; 361 Mont. 22; 2011 Mont. LEXIS 178
255 P.3d 166 (2011) 2011 MT 133 361 Mont. 22 In re The MARRIAGE OF Davie Lin LLOYD, Petitioner and Appellant, and Brett Camaron Lloyd, Respondent and Appellee. No. DA 10-0494. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs April 6, 2011. Decided June 8, 2011. *167 For Ap
United States Tax Court · 1976-01-29 · Published · cited 0× · 65 T.C. 847
OPINION In these consolidated cases, we are presented with the following issues: (1) Whether Wilmot Fleming Engineering Co. properly computed its basis in machinery and equipment purchased from decedent and Wilmot in respect of which property the corporation claimed depreciation deductions for its fiscal years 1968,1969, and 1970 in excess of the respective amounts allowed therefor
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2010-07-13 · Published · cited 4× · 433 B.R. 230; 2010 WL 2803631
433 B.R. 230 (2010) In re Casey Lynn FLEMINGS, Debtor; Richard P. Jahn, Jr., Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Casey Lynn Flemings, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 09-14733. Adversary No. 09-1157. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee, Southern Division. July 13, 2010. *233 W. Lloyd Stanley, Jr., Chattanooga, TN, for Debtor and Defen
United States Tax Court · 1976-01-29 · Published · cited 2× · 65 T.C. 847; 1976 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 168
Wilmot Fleming Engineering Co., et al., 1 Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, RespondentWilmont Fleming Engineering Co. v. CommissionerDocket Nos. 8657-73, 8757-73, 8758-73
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2014-09-26 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-14-00552-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE STATE FARM LLOYDS, RICHARD FREYMANN, SAM FLEMING, SILVIA GARZA, AND EVELYN DONALSON On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Long
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2013-08-20 · Published · cited 0×
August 20, 2013 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. TAMMYLERN CURRY, RICHARD SZYMANSKI, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARION SZYMANSKI, EMILIE WHITEHEAD, CONNIE BOHANNON, AND LINDA SCOTT, Appellees NO. 14-11-01093-CV NO. 14-12-00300-CV GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. ALVAREZ, CAROLYN B., AMAN, MARIA