Cases

OPINION AND ORDER RAMOS, District Judge. This putative class action arises from Plaintiffs’ allegations that Boulder Brands, Inc. (“Boulder”) and GFA Brands, Inc. (“GFA”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) deceptively labeled as “fat free” certain milk products that — due to the addition of an omega-3 oil blend — in fact contained one gram of fat per serving. Plaintiffs bring three claims under N

This latter set of circumstances arises only in a " 'special and small category' of cases." Gunn , 568 U.S. at 258, 133 S.Ct. 1059 (quoting Empire Healthchoice ,

712 F.Supp.2d 801 (2010) Shannon M. WHEELER, Plaintiff, v. BRADY CORPORATION, Defendant. Case No. 08-C-1005. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. May 6, 2010. *805 Shannon D. McDonald, Carroll & McDonald LLC, New Berlin, WI, for Plaintiff. Autumn M. Kruse, David B. Kern, Quarles & Brady LLP, Milwaukee, WI,

MEMORANDUM ALETA A. TRAUGER, United States District Judge Pending before the court are three Rule 56 motions. The defendant Jackson National Life Insurance Co. (“JNL”) has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (“JNL Motion”) seeking dismissal of all claims brought by the plaintiff Josh Wheeler (“Wheeler”) (Docket No. 32), to which Wheeler has filed a Response in opposition (Docket No. 46), and JNL has filed

748 F.Supp.2d 323 (2010) Alice H. ALLEN and Laurance E. Allen, d/b/a Al-Lens Farm, and Garret Sitts and Ralph Sitts, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DAIRY FARMERS OF AMERICA, INC., Dairy Marketing Services, LLC, Dean Foods Company, and HP Hood LLC, Defendants. Case No. 5:09-cv-230. United States District Court, D. Vermont. August 30, 20

O'ROURKE, J. *817I. INTRODUCTION These consolidated appeals involve a property where a shooting range had been operated for decades (the Property), its remediation by Plaintiffs Otay Land Company, LLC (OLC) and Flat Rock Land Company, LLC (FRLC) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and their efforts to recover remediat

Filed 9/26/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OTAY LAND COMPANY, LLC et al., D068347, D069029 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. Nos. GIC869480; 37-2009-101976-CU-OR-CTL; v.

APPEL, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part from the majority/plurality opinion. In my view, only the instruction related to material adverse action in connection with plaintiffs retaliation claim is flawed. I find the district court properly instructed the jury on all other issues in this case.

OPINION PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................10 II. BACKGROUND............................................................11 A. The Alleged Conspiracy..........

MEMORANDUM & ORDER DEARIE, District Judge. This case involves four separate actions arising out of allegedly fraudulent disclosures made by defendant CINAR Corporation (“CINAR” or “the Company”) and its officers in various public financial statements issued during the period from April 8, 1998 through March 10, 2000. The first suit, In re CINAR Corporation Securities Litigation, No

186 F.Supp.2d 279 (2002) In re CINAR CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Phillip G. Kelley, Kathy H. Kelley, Michael G. Mayberry, and Sharon H. Mayberry, Plaintiffs, v. Cinar Corporation, Micheline Charest, and Ronald A. Weinberg, Defendants. Steven T. CARSON, Patricia L. Carson, and Janet B. Dellosa, Plaintiffs, v. Cinar Corporation, Cinar Holdings, Inc., Micheline Charest, Ronald A. Weinberg, and Hasanain Panju, Defendants. Ka

688 F.Supp.2d 598 (2010) RIMKUS CONSULTING GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. Nickie G. CAMMARATA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-07-0405. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. February 19, 2010. *607 David Allen Ward, Jr., The Ward Law Firm, The Woodlands, TX, for Plaintiff. Larry E. Demmons, Taggart

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–0574 Filed June 23, 2017 Amended August 25, 2017 TINA HASKENHOFF, Appellee, vs. HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Chickasaw County, John J. Bauercamper, Judge. Employer appeals judgment on jury verdict for plaintiff on claims for sexual harassment and retaliation. DISTRICT COU

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss, filed November 18, 2016 (Doc. 71)("First JN Motion"); (ii) Defendants' Second Motion for Judicial Notice in Support of the Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint, filed February 23, 2017 (Doc. 91)("Second JN Motion"); (iii) Defendants'

Related to ECF Nos. 4, 75, 516, 923, & 938 MEMORANDUM OPINION BARBARA J. HOUSER, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. JURISDICTION, AUTHORITY, AND VENUE... 355 II. PRELIMINARY MATTERS... 356 A. Factual and Computation Stipulations of the Parties... 356 B. Facts Found Due to this Court’s Application of Collateral Estopp

138 P.3d 963 (2006) Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian; Peter Ilgenfritz and David Shull; Johanna Bender and Sherri Kokx; Janet Helson and Betty Lundquist; David Serkin-Poole and Michael Serkin-Poole; Vegavahini Subramaniam and Vaijayanthimala Nagarajan; Elizabeth Reis and Barbara Steele; and Michelle Esguerra; and Boo Torres De Esguera, Respondents, v. KING COUNTY; Ron Sims, King County Executive; and Dean Logan, King County Director of Recor

ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3

FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

ACCEPTED 05-15-01480-CV 05-15-01480-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/4/2015 2:42:24 PM