Cases

Defendant issued two policies on the life of Mose J. Boggs on August 2 and 5, 1935, respectively. He was then at least 75 years old. One policy is for $500. *Page 663 Plaintiff C.G. Goodwin is named therein as beneficiary. The other policy on its face is for $1,000. It was intended to be for only $500. Plaintiff Sam C. Goodwin is designated beneficiary therein. Boggs died on November 17, 1936. The beneficiaries submitted to the insurer the usual proof of

PER CURIAM: Veronica D’Antignac appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of her employer Deere & Co. on her Title VII employment discrimination claim. In 2005, D’Antignac entered Chapter 13 bankruptcy. In August 2008, while still in bankruptcy, D’Antignac filed a “Charge of Discrimination” against Deere with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The charge, arising out of a June 2008 inc

MEMORANDUM ** Jo Ann Koosmann appeals from the district court’s revocation of her supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Koosmann contends that the district court abused its discretion in revoking her supervised release because there was insufficient evidence to support the conclusion that she associated with an individual engaged in crimin

LUCERO, Circuit Judge, dissenting, with whom SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge, joins. No case in my tenure on the court could be more compellingly described as meeting the Rule 35 en banc standard of presenting a “question of exceptional importance” deserving the attention of the entire court than this. In one of the more shameful events in our nation’s history, over two hundred African-Americans were slaughtered and a

MEMORANDUM ** Erick Salazar-Salazar appeals his 24-month sentence imposed after the revocation of his term of supervised release. Counsel of record for the appellant, Jeffrey H. Rutherford, Esq., filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and we deny the motion. Pursuant to our i

TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge. On May 31, 1921, and following into the next day, violent attacks destroyed the African-American community of Greenwood, Oklahoma. An angry white mob converged on Greenwood in a devastating assault, burning homes and businesses, killing up to three hundred people, and leaving thousands homeless. In February 2003, Plaintiffs-Appellants, all Riot survivors or descendants of survivors, filed suit a

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Abel Hernandez-Castro appeals the district court’s judgment sentencing him to eighteen months in prison upon the revocation of his term of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, United States v. George, 184 F.3d 1119, 1120 (9th Cir.1999), and we affirm. Hernandez-Castro contends that the district co

53 F.3d 341NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee,v.Todd M. WILLIAMS, Defendant/Appellant. No. 94-10319. United States Cour

Jenkins, J. In these consolidated appeals, appellants ask us to reinstate their claims in which they seek declaratory and injunctive relief on the ground that respondents are allegedly violating sections 1 and *8925 of article IX of the California Constitution.1 Appellants' claims are general in nature. They alleg

Opinion JENKINS, J. — In these consolidated appeals, appellants ask us to reinstate their claims in which they seek declaratory and injunctive relief on the ground that respondents are allegedly violating sections 1 and 5 of article IX of the California Constitution.1 Appellants’ claims are general in nature. They allege the constitu

ORDER HAROLD L. MURPHY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [10], I. Background A. Plaintiffs Allegations 1. The Parties Plaintiff is a citizen of the State of Georgia and resides in Dalton, Whitfield County, Georgia. (Compl. (Docket Entry No. 1) ¶ 3.)

344 F.Supp.2d 1261 (2004) Darrell WALKER, Plaintiff, v. FAITH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. No. 03-2358-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. November 17, 2004. *1264 Steven D. Horak, Olathe, KS, for Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM & ORDER LUNGSTRUM, District Judge. Plaintiff Darrell Walke

Filed 4/20/16 (review denied 8/22/16; reposted to include Supreme Court statements upon denial of review) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE CAMPAIGN FOR QUALITY EDUCATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A134423 v

OPINION JONES, Presiding Judge. The appellant, Ronnie Bradfield (defendant), was convicted of attempted first-degree murder, a Class A felony, carrying a firearm during judicial proceedings, a Class E felony, and possession of a firearm after being convicted of a felony, a Class E felony, by a jury of his peers. The trial court, finding the defendant was a persistent offender, imposed a Range III sentence

846 P.2d 230 (1993) 123 Idaho 228 STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Rickie STORM, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 19287, 19288. Court of Appeals of Idaho. February 1, 1993. *231 Orndorff, Peterson, Hawley, Wight & Gilman, Boise, for defendant-appellant. Thomas D. Widman argued. Larry EchoHawk,

656 So.2d 677 (1995) STATE of Louisiana, Appellee, v. Robert A. STEWART, Appellant. No. 27049-KA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. May 10, 1995. Rehearing Denied June 15, 1995. *678 Whitmeyer and Glassel by Stephen A. Glassell, Shreveport, for appellant. Richard Ieyoub, Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH DEC 13 2004 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK FISHER Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON SEPTEMBER 1996 SESSION FILED June 24, 1997 STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk )

644 F.3d 1028 (2011) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Walter Watson, Intervenor-Plaintiff, v. C.R. ENGLAND, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, and Walter Watson, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.R. England, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 09-4207, 09-4217. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

519 Pa. 550 (1988) 549 A.2d 503 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Bernadette REILLY, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued January 21, 1988. Decided October 17, 1988. *551 Michael S. Goodwin, Feasterville, John W. Packel, Philadelphia, for amicus — Defender Assoc. of Phila. Leona