Cases

08/25/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 1, 2022 TERESA LOCKE v. GAIUS LOCKE ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Williamson County No. 2021-CV-279 James G. Martin, III, Judge ___________________________

STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Windsor Unit Docket # 241-5-15 Wrev RONALD LOCKE, Petitioner v. ANDREW A. PALLITO, [Former] Commissioner, DOC Respondent Findings Of Fact, Conclusions Of Law, And Order This matter came before the court for final hearing on the merits on March 25, 2016. Petitioner was represented by Attorney Seth E. Lipschutz. Respondent was represented by Attorney Robert C. Menzel, Jr. After the hearing, on March 30, 2016, Mr. Locke himself sent a multi-page

[Cite as State v. Locke, 2021-Ohio-4609.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 110511 v. : NATALIE LOCKE, :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL S. FLAHERTY et al., Plaintiffs, v. GINA RAIMONDO et al., Civil Action No. 11-660 (TJK) Defendants,1 and SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES COALITION, Defendant-Intervenor. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Michael Flaherty, Cap

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

MEREDITH B. SWITZER, Judge Appellant Katelynn Locke appeals the Lonoke County Circuit Court's grant of summary judgment to appellees State Farm Insurance Company and Patrick Sinclair, a State Farm agent (collectively "State Farm").1 We affirm. I. Facts Katelynn's father, James, died on May 9, 2015, when Katelynn was fifteen years old. Katelynn's mother is also de

Court of Appeals Tenth Appellate District of Texas 10-25-00244-CV James L. Locke, Appellant v. Breviloba, LLC, Appellee On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Brazos County, Texas Judge Amanda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL S. FLAHERTY et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 11-660 (TJK) WILBUR ROSS et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Michael Flaherty, Captain Alan Hastbacka, and the Ocean River Institute filed their initial complaint in 20

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JUSTIN M. LOCKE, § § No. 77, 2026 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID Nos. 2207013451,

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1285 ___________________________ Matthew Locke Plaintiff - Appellant v. County of Hubbard; Cory Aukes, in his official and individual capacity; Scott

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Pet. transferred

[Cite as State v. Locke, 2018-Ohio-27.] COURT OF APPEALS ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : JUDGES: : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff - Appellee : Hon. John W. Wise, J. : Hon. Craig R.

Cypher, J. Complaints issued in the District Court charging the defendants, Andrew K. Locke and Tanik S. Kerr, with trafficking in fifty pounds or more of marijuana, G. L. c. 94C, § 32E(a), and *498 conspiracy to traffic in marijuana, G. L. c. 94C, § 40.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Kerri N. Lechtrecker, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated August 28, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, awarded the parties joint legal custody of the subject child, with physical custody and final decision-making authority to the father. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The father commenced this proceeding pu

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

2 It is unclear why the Fourth Circuit elected not to publish these opinions, but what is clear is that they not only said it, but two separate panels said it and ignoring that would be foolish absent a strong reason to do so. 3 See also United States v. Padilla ,

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION To the Appellate Division, Superior Court: A petition for certification of the judgment in A-002617-14 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same; It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.