Cases

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(f) and 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff Lois Bean appeals fr

PATRICK F. KELLY, District Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Donald Wayne Sweet and Lois

LOGAN, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff John Deere Company sought a determination in the bankruptcy court that the debt owed it by defendant R. Clare Gerlach is not dischargeable in the bankruptcy of defendant and his wife because it was procured through fraud. The bankruptcy court held that the entire debt is dischargeable, and the district court affirmed. We reverse and remand for a

McKAY, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a), Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore submitted without oral ar

LOGAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal is from a judgment for plaintiff in a case arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant W. Nyles Spurlock, a public school principal, challenges a jury award of $113,000 compensatory and $7,500 punitive damages to plaintiff Lois E. Wren, a teacher who contended at trial that Spurlock harassed her in

Boslaugh, J. This is a proceeding under the Nebraska Workmen’s Compensation Act arising out of the death of Donald J. Niesen, an employee of the Logan County Co-op Oil Association. The plaintiff, who is the widow of the deceased employee, recovered an award following the hearing before a single judge of the compensation court and, on rehearing, before a three-judge panel. The defendants have appealed. The re

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Submitted on Briefs August 28, 2001 In re: Estate of Lois Chandler Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 98-55595-1 John F. Weaver, Chancellor FILED NOVEMBER 15, 2001 No. E2000-03055-COA-R3-CV Buster Chandler, Jr. (“Chandle

Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Majority and Concurring Opinions filed December 20, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00213-CV CARGOTEC CORPORATION, MACGREGOR USA, INC. AND CARGOTEC USA, INC., Appellants V. LOGAN INDUSTRIES, Appellee On Appeal from the 506th Judicial Distric

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE IN RE: THE CONSERVATORSHIP ) FILED February 2, OF LOIS G. CLAYTON ) 2005 ) LILLIAN CLAYTON SALVATORE, ) Cecil Crowson, Guardian of Lois G. Clayton, et al., ) Jr.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON JANUARY SESSION, 1997 STATE OF TE NNE SSE E, ) FILED C.C.A. NO. 02C01-9609-CC-00297 ) April 10, 1997 Appellee, ) ) FAYETTE COUNTY Cecil Crowson, Jr. V.

OPINION JANICE M. HOLDER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GARY R. WADE, C.J., and CORNELIA A. CLARK, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined. Mother and Father entered into a marital dissolution agreement and a parenting plan for their two minor children. Mother subsequent

198 P.3d 395 (2008) 2008 OK CIV APP 90 Joey L. SPENCE, Mitch Johnson by and through Guardian, Bobbie Johnson, Bobbie Johnson, individually and, Crockett Johnson, individually, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. BROWN-MINNEAPOLIS TANK, CO., Defendant/Appellee, SEFCO, Inc.; B&T Company; Great American Tank Company; SEFCO Equipment, L.L.C.; SEFCO-Edison BMT, L.L.C.; Edison Brown-Minneapolis Tank Oklahoma, L.L.C.; GATX Corporat

MEMORANDUM *** Plaintiff Guy Beckett appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint as preempted by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (SLUSA). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm in part and reverse in part, and remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. I. Beckett filed a class a

MEMORANDUM *** Plaintiff Guy Beckett appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint as preempted by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (SLUSA). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm in part and reverse in part, and remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. I. Beckett filed a class a

DECISION AND ORDER LARIMER, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The facts of this case are set forth in my prior decision,1 entered December 12, 2000 (Dkt.# 139), familiarity with which is assumed, and will not be repeated at length here. Briefly, Richard Seils (“Seils”) and Lois Vreeland (“Vreeland”) (collectively “plaintiffs”), teachers in defendant Rocheste

226 F.2d 661 Melvin GRIFFETH and Lois D. Griffeth, Appellants,v.UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee. No. 13611. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. May 9, 1955. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Andersen & Andersen, Pocatello, Idaho, Newel G. Daines, Logan, Utah, L. Delos Daines, Salt Lake City, Utah,

LOGAN, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Ronald R. Prater appeals from a decision of the United States Tax Court. The only issue on appeal is whether deductions petitioner took on his federal income tax returns following a divorce were properly deductible as alimony payments under Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) § 215, or if part or all were nondeductible property settlement payments.

192 F.Supp.2d 100 (2002) Richard W. SEILS, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated, Lois Vreeland, Individually and on Behalf of All other Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. ROCHESTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. No. 98-CV-6197L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. January 23, 2002.

140 Wis.2d 71 (1987) 409 N.W.2d 391 ESTATE OF Clare Fink LOGAN,[†] Caroline A. Fink, personal representative, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL CASUALTY CO.,[†] Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Respondent, Gregory P. DOWLING,[†] Defendant-Respondent and Cross-Appellant. No. 86-0695. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Slavin v. Kay, 108 So.2d 462 (Fla.1958).