Cases

JONES, Justice I. Nature op the Case This case arises out of injuries suffered by Bryan N. Henrie (“Henrie”) while he was participating in a community service event organized by the Mormon Helping Hands (“Helping Hands”), a priesthood-directed program run by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the “Church”). Henrie asserts on appeal that the

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ROBERT J. SHELBY This case relates to lawsuits presently pending before the Navajo Nation District Court. In those cases, Defendants RJ, MM, BN, and LK (Doe Defendants) allege that they suffered abuse years ago after Plaintiffs, the Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and LDS Family Services, placed them off-reservation with LDS fam

LOUGHRY, Chief Justice: The petitioners (plaintiffs below) are nine minors and their parents, individually and as parents, guardians, and next friends, 1 in this *434 action alleging various negligence claims, fraud, intentional infliction

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2017 Term FILED June 14, 2017 released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY, II CLERK N

Justice PARRISH, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION T1 This case comes before us on cross-motions for summary disposition and on a petition for an extraordinary writ,. The issues presented in the motions and the petition are (1) whether an interlocutory decision is subject to the implementing order requirements of rule 7(F)(2) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure and, if so, (2) whether a ru

SUBSTITUTE OPINION, THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED NOVEMBER 26, 2013 IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN. HORTON, Justice. Heidi Beers, a minor, was injured after jumping from a bridge into the Payette Riv *683 er. Heidi had been attending a eampout organized by ward members of her church.

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RAYMOND P. MOORE, United States District Judge THIS MATTER is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Defendant the *1200Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints’ (“Defendant Church”) Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 47); (2) Plaintiff Ashley Lindeman’s (“Pl

.-•;-;•-C7 AP STATE Or WA-SriTiui tt\ij\y..c.i. r.>iu- IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON N.K., an individual proceeding under a pseudonym, No. 67645-8-1 Appellant, DIVISION ONE v. C

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 39319 GREGORY and CARALEE BEERS, ) individually and on behalf of HEIDI L.) BEERS, a minor ) ) Boise, June 2013 Term Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) ) 2013 Opinion No. 117 v. )

*81 DURHAM, J. These opposing petitions for writs of mandamus challenge a trial court order allowing the release, to the press and to the public, of redacted versions of 1,247 “ineligible volunteer” files belonging to defendant Boy Scouts of America (BSA). Those files contain information regarding child se

Becker, J. ¶1 Appellant NK1 was molested in 1977 by a volunteer scout leader with a church-sponsored Boy Scout troop in Shelton, Washington, when NK was 12 years old. Thirty-two years later, NK brought negligence claims against the church, the Boy Scouts of America (BSA), and the local boy scouting council for failing to protect him. These claims were dismissed on summary judgment on the ground that t

Appelwick, C.J. ¶1 Two sisters who had been sexually-abused by their stepfather sought damages from the Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (LDS Church) for negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress. They also sought damages against their stepfather for intentional infliction of emotional distress. A jury found the LDS Church liable both for the failure of a bishop to

Justice LEE, opinion of the Court: 1 In this case we are asked to answer a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Cireuit concerning the preclusive effect of a decision like that in Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Lindberg, 2010 UT 51, 238 P.3d 1054. The state law question presented focuses specifically on whether our "discretionary review of a pet

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION The Court has before it the Boy Scout Defendants’ motion to strike the Second Amended Complaint, or, in the alternative, to dismiss Counts 3 and 4 of the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 126), the Boy Scout Defendants’ motion to strike response (Dkt. 132), and the LDS Defendants’ Motion to Compel (Dkt. 141).

Appellate Case: 23-4110 Document: 133-1 Date Filed: 08/26/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 26, 2025

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DEE BENSON, District Judge. Before the court is the plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. The issue presented by the motion and the case itself is straightforward: Are the defendants’ actions in reforming and administering the United Effort Plan Trust (“UEP Trust” or the “Trust”) in violation of the Establishment and Free Exerci

238 P.3d 1054 (2010) 2010 UT 51 The FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, an association of individuals, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Denise P. LINDBERG, Third District Court Judge, Respondent. No. 20090859. Supreme Court of Utah. August 27, 2010. *1056 Kenneth A. Okazaki, Stephen C.

132 Neva, Advance Opinion IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING No. 65424 BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS ON BEHALF OF CLEVELAND RANCH, FILED Petitioner, vs. JAN 2 8 2016 THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

132 Neva, Advance Opinion IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING No. 65424 BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS ON BEHALF OF CLEVELAND RANCH, FILED Petitioner, vs. JAN 2 8 2016 THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

86 P.3d 1140 (2004) 192 Or. App. 567 CORPORATION OF the PRESIDING BISHOP OF the CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, Respondent, v. CITY OF WEST LINN, Petitioner, and United States of America, Intervenor on Judicial Review, and Robert Fulton, Susan Fulton, Gregg Crawford, Holly Crawford, Walter Swanson, Kathi Swanson, Dale Krug, Colleen Krug and Steven Wilkes, Intervenors-Respondents below.