⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

15 opinions for “Lorenzo E. Paschal”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016-06-21 · Published · cited 23× · 826 F.3d 758; 26 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1103; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 11211; 2016 WL 3409651
Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge HARRIS wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge TRAXLER and Judge THACKER joined. PAMELA HARRIS, Circuit Judge: Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), employees who work overtime generally are entitled to overtime pay. There is an exception — like all FLSA exceptions, narrowly construed — for certain “e
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 0× · 534 F.3d 1320; 13 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1638; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15964
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2024-07-10 · Published · cited 0×
07/10/2024 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 4, 2023 Session FAMILY TRUST SERVICES LLC ET AL. v. GREEN WISE HOMES LLC ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court for Davidson County N
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022-11-21 · Published · cited 0×
11/21/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 2, 2022 Session FAMILY TRUST SERVICES LLC ET AL. v. GREEN WISE HOMES LLC ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 15-0780-BC Anne C. Martin, Chancellor _
State v. Burkettpublic domain
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2014-06-25 · Published · cited 0× · 2014 SD 38; 849 N.W.2d 624; 2014 WL 2895400; 2014 S.D. LEXIS 56
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice, and ZIN-TER, Justice. [¶ 1.] Chief Justice Gilbertson delivers the majority opinion of the Court as to Issue 2 and Issue 3. Justice ZINTER delivers the majority opinion of the Court as to Issue 1. [¶ 2.] Gilbertson, Chief Justice, writing for the Court on Issue 2 and Issue 3. [¶ 3.] Joseph Burkett appeals his conviction for third offense driving under the influen
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-28 · Published · cited 7× · 534 F.3d 1320; 2008 WL 2880345
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998-02-26 · Published · cited 87× · 137 F.3d 1094
137 F.3d 1094 48 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1184, 98 Cal. Daily Op.Serv. 1360,98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1903UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Lamont Benedict NELSON, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Keith Lamar LOTT, aka Kevin Moore, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Kimberly Nichol EDWARDS, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of Ame
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998-02-26 · Published · cited 143× · 137 F.3d 1094; 48 Fed. R. Serv. 1184; 98 Daily Journal DAR 1903; 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1360; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 3021
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge: Appellants robbed two J. Jessop’s Jewelry stores in San Diego on July 11 and August 12,. 1992. The robberies were carefully planned operations. Members of the robbery crew posed as customers inside each store. Once these crew members were in position, another member of the crew entered and brandished a pistol. The rest of the crew then sprung into action, cleaning-out each store in a ma
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018-12-19 · Published · cited 32× · 355 F. Supp. 3d 646
WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *658Z.J., a former Vanderbilt University ("Vanderbilt") student, brings this action arising out of Vanderbilt's investigation of an accusation of sexual misconduct made against him by a female student ("A.H.") following an alleged physical incident that occurred after a St. Patrick's
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966-06-23 · Published · cited 11× · 405 S.W.2d 351; 1966 Tex. App. LEXIS 2154
405 S.W.2d 351 (1966) Guerry M. STRONG, Appellant, v. DELHI-TAYLOR OIL CORPORATION et al., Appellees. No. 142. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. June 23, 1966. Rehearing Denied August 4, 1966. *353 Pat Holloway, of Holloway & Simmons, Dallas, for appellant. Neal King, of Hill, King &
Ludy v. Zumwaltpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1927-08-15 · Published · cited 40× · 259 P. 52; 85 Cal. App. 119; 1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 357
The plaintiff brought this suit to foreclose a a mortgage upon certain lands situated in Glenn County given by the defendants I.G. and Mattie B. Zumwalt to plaintiff to secure the payment to the latter of a promissory note, dated January 13, 1920, for the sum of $42,601.30. The complaint is in the usual form in foreclosure proceedings. It alleges, however, that the appellant Western Canal Company and certain other parties "have, or claim to have, or assert, some interest in or claim up
Texas Supreme Court · 1910-01-19 · Published · cited 261× · 122 S.W. 533; 103 Tex. 94; 1910 Tex. LEXIS 275
Mr. Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the court. Walter E. Kimball and others instituted this suit in the District Court of Hardin County against the Houston Oil Company of Texas and others, to recover a league of land granted by the Government of Coahuila and Texas to O. C. Kelson and located in said county. The plaintiffs’ petition contained the usual all
Howard v. McKenziepublic domain
Texas Supreme Court · 1880-11-03 · Published · cited 3× · 54 Tex. 171; 1880 Tex. LEXIS 143
Gould, Associate Justice. The plaintiff in error complains in his first, second and fourth assignments of error of the action of the court in allowing the substition of new parties instead of original parties, deceased, and of a new equitable course of action, instead of common law *177causes of action originally sued upon. The questions' thus presented can only be underst
District Court, Canal Zone · 1945-03-20 · Published · cited 4× · 70 F. Supp. 281; 1945 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1503
70 F.Supp. 281 (1945) PLAYA DE FLOR LAND & IMPROVEMENT CO. v. UNITED STATES. Civ. No. 969. District Court, D. Canal Zone. Div. Cristobal. March 20, 1945. *282 *283 *284 *285 *286