Cases

793 F.2d 1214 21 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 264 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Harold Joseph ROSENTHAL, Philip Anthony Bonadonna, RobertEdward Dunleavy, Jr., George Lombardi, GarlandHubert Watson, Larry Roger Stewart,Joseph Vincent Junker,Defendants-Appellants.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Rose Marie JUNKER, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, P

LOCKEMY, J.: John Doe appeals the circuit court’s decision to dismiss his action pursuant to Rules 3, 12(b)(1), and 12(b)(2), SCRCP. Doe argues the circuit court failed to apply the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (the Act).1 We affirm. FACTS On January 28, 2008, Doe filed a complaint against the City of Duncan (the City), asserting a cause of action for negl

RUCKER, J., dissenting. At the age of seventeen Andrew Conley murdered his ten-year-old brother. I *881agree with the majority that Dr. Daum’s testimony was properly admitted and I do not believe the trial court manifestly abused its discretion in weighing aggravating and mitigating circumstances in this case. However, I do not agree Conley should have

WORKMAN, Justice: This case is before the Court upon the consolidated appeals of the West Virginia Office of Miners’ Health, Safety and Training (“OMHST”) from two separate Orders entered in two separate actions by the Circuit Court of Kanawha County. The first Order entered on July 24, 2009, dismissed the OMHST’s petition for writ of prohibition in which the OMHST sought to prohibit the Coal Mine Safety Board of Appeals (“Boa

703 S.E.2d 280 (2010) STATE of West Virginia ex rel. Ronald L. WOOTEN, Director, and the West Virginia Office of Miners' Health, Safety and Training, Petitioners Below, Appellants, v. The COAL MINE SAFETY BOARD OF APPEALS and William Coulson, Respondents Below, Appellees. and West Virginia Office of Miners' Health, Safety and Training, Petitioner Below, Appellant v. William A. Coulson, Defendant Below, Appellee.

391 F.Supp.2d 210 (2005) George RUNKLE, Plaintiff, v. Alberto GONZALES et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 04-0714 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 28, 2005. *211 *212 *213 *214

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 20, 2009 Session GARY L. WATTS AND JANET WATTS, Parents And Next Friends of CLINTON D. WATTS, Deceased v. EARNESTINE J. MORRIS, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-002527-05 John R. McCarroll, Jr., Judge No. W2008-00896-COA-R3-CV - Filed May 6, 2009

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. The Minneapolis Community Development Agency and the City of Minneapolis appeal from a final judgment entered in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota upon a jury verdict finding them liable to La Societe Generale Immobiliere and LSGI, Inc., for the breach of a development contract and for injury to the developer’s reputation in violation of the,Due Process Clause of the Fou

44 Ill. App.3d 439 (1976) 358 N.E.2d 317 ELBRIDGE ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. — (UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.) No. 76-184. Illinois Appellate Court — Fifth District. Opinion filed November 24, 1976. *44

657 So.2d 610 (1995) STATE of Louisiana, ex rel. William J. GUSTE, Jr., Attorney General v. Douglas D. "Doug" GREEN, Commissioner of Insurance. No. 94 CA 1138. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. June 23, 1995. *611 Jack Brook, New Orleans, for plaintiff/appellee, Jim Brown, Com'r of Ins. State of La. Patrick F. M

44 F.3d 629 LaSOCIETE GENERALE IMMOBILIERE, a French corporation; LSGI,Inc., a Delaware corporation, Appellees/Cross-appellants,v.MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY; City ofMinneapolis, Appellants/Cross-appellees. No. 93-3123, 93-2920. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994.Decided Dec. 22, 1994.Rehearing and

HENRY, Chief Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. This is an action in guaranty, wherein the trial judge and the Court of Appeals found the guarantor to be liable. The only issue with which we are concerned is whether the guarantor, an admitted alcoholic, was mentally competent to execute the contract of guarantee. I. Landcare Corporation was

DANIEL HOLCOMBE THOMAS, Senior District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION This is a drug conspiracy case wherein appellants were charged with engaging in racketeering by conspiring to participate in a large scale organization to smuggle and distribute cocaine. Appellants were members of a large cocaine smuggling operation referred to as “southern comfort”. The federal gra

Mr. JUSTICE KARNS delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant, General American Transportation Company (GATX), appeals from the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Madison County on a jury verdict finding it jointly liable with Norfolk and Western Railway Company (N&W) for the wrongful death and personal

368 F.Supp. 454 (1973) Leonard DOWNS et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 73-1246. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. December 28, 1973. *455 *456 David Ferleger, Mental Patient Civil Liberties Project, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaint

May 31, 1937. The opinion of the Court was delivered by It appears from the record that the late A.J. Matheson devised unto his son, A.D. Matheson, a large plantation located in the County of Marlboro, known as "Louden," and also a valuable residence situate in the Town of Bennettsville. The devise of the plantation to A.D. Matheson was made subject to his assuming and carrying out a contract which the testator had made with the Board of Missions of the Presbyterian Church in the United State

The Greybull Valley Irrigation District was organized in 1920, and assessments for benefits were confirmed in 1921. The district was unable to sell its bonds, and nothing further of importance was done in the matter until the district, seemingly in 1934, opened up negotiations with the Government of the United States, for the purpose of procuring from the latter a grant and an agreement to purchase the bonds of the district. These negotiations resulted in a contract, entered into in 1935, ref