Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Louis D. Burrell”
In re Burrellpublic domain
*110 OPINION GERALD D. FINES, Chief Judge. This matter having come before the Court on a Motion for Leave to Withdraw Attorney Appearance filed by Attorney Richard F. Kurth, Petition for Attorney Fees filed by Richard F. Kurth, Debtors’ objection thereto, and Motion to Reinstate Motion for Civil Contempt; the Court, having heard arguments o
Burrell v. City of Kankakeepublic domain
815 F.2d 1127 Louis D. BURRELL and E. Jean Burrell, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITY OF KANKAKEE, a municipal corporation, and KankakeeCounty Housing Authority, an Illinois municipalcorporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 85-3075. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Dec. 1, 1986.Decided April 6, 1987.
Burrell v. City of Kankakeepublic domain
BAUER, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs, Louis Burrell and Jean Bur-rell, appeal from the district court's dismissal of their complaint alleging that defendants, the City of Kankakee (“City”), and the Kankakee County Housing Authority (“KCHA”), violated their federally-protected rights under the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3604 and 3617, and their substantive due process rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. At the close of the plaintiff
Estate of Burrell v. Estate of Burrellpublic domain
245 P.3d 1106 (2010) 2010 MT 280 In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Evalyn Virginia BURRELL. Donald L. Burrell, Christopher Burrell, Esther Fowler, Petitioners and Appellants, v. Estate Of Evalyn V. Burrell, Louis Burrell, Personal Representative, Respondents and Appellees. No. DA 10-0224. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs November 10, 2010.<
Burrell v. Statepublic domain
LOLLEY, J. 11 This consolidated appeal arises from the Third Judicial District Court, Parish of Union, State of Louisiana. Albert Ronnie Burrell and Michael Ray Graham appeal the judgment of the trial court denying their claims under La. R.S. 15:572.8 for compensation for wrongful conviction and imprisonment. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. FACTS Albe
William Burrell, Jr. v. Tom Staffpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT __________ No. 21-2846 __________ WILLIAM L. BURRELL, JR.; JOSHUA HUZZARD; DAMPSEY STUCKEY v. TOM STAFF, Individually; LOUIS DENAPLES, individually; DOMINICK DENAPLES; LACKAWANNA RECYCLING CENTER INC; COUNTY OF LACKAWANNA; LACKAWANNA
STATE OF MISSOURI v. TIMOTHY LOUIS SMITHpublic domain
In Division STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Respondent, ) No. SD38313 ) v. ) Filed: August 28, 2024 ) TIMOTHY LOUIS SMITH, )
Lataisha M. Jackson v. Charles Anthony Burrellpublic domain
06/12/2020 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 1, 2020 Session1 LATAISHA M. JACKSON v. CHARLES ANTHONY BURRELL ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-000328-15 Valerie L. Smi
Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District Division Two IN THE MATTER OF ) GERALD E. WHISENAND, ) RACHELLE D. FRANZESKOS, ) ) Appellant, )
In Division KENNETH D. GILMORE, ) ) Respondent, ) No. SD37344 ) v. ) Filed: November 14, 2022 ) MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL ) SERVICES, CHILDREN'S
Alvis v. Morrispublic domain
DON E. BURRELL, J. Keith Alvis (“Plaintiff’) is attempting to appeal from the summary judgment en*510tered in favor of Stacy Morris and Gerald Morris (“Defendants”). Because Plaintiffs “STATEMENT OF FACTS” is not based on the parties’ Rule 74.04 statements of undisputed material facts and responses thereto (“SUMF”), we have no choice but to dismiss Plaintiffs appeal.<
JERRY D. BRUMBAUGH, ) ) Petitioner-Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. SD35835 ) JOEL W. WALTERS, ) Filed: April 30,
DON E. BURRELL, P.J. Philip H. Berger (“Employee”) appeals the judgment (“the dismissal judgment”) that dismissed with prejudice his second amended petition (“the petition”) against Emerson Climate Technologies (“Emerson”), Scroll Compressors LLC (“Scroll”), and George Svaranowic (collectively, “Respondents”). The petition presented three counts: (1) (“t
State ex rel. Zobel v. Burrellpublic domain
RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge. In January 2005, the Greene County sheriffs department executed a search warrant on property owned by William Zobel. The warrant was issued pursuant to section 578.018 RSMo (2000). Sheriffs deputies seized approximately 120 severely malnourished and emaciated horses from the property.1 The horses were impounded and cared for by the Humane Society of Missouri and the C
MARY W. SHEFFIELD, P.J.— OPINION AUTHOR Dave R. Williams (“Mr. Williams”) and his wife Candice J. Williams (“Mrs. Williams”) (collectively “Appellants”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (“HSBC”). Appellants raise eleven points on appeal. We disagree with their arguments and affirm the trial court’s judgme
Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District In Division STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) v. ) No. SD37623
Wells v. Lester E. Cox Medical Centerspublic domain
DON E. BURRELL, J. In two points relied on, Jessica L. Wells (“Plaintiff’) appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Lester E. Cox Medical Center’s Cox College of Nursing and Health Sciences (“College”) on her claim that she was improperly terminated from College’s nursing program under section 213.0651 of the Missouri Human Rights Act (“MHRA”). Because whether Plaintiff, who has “a p
DON E. BURRELL, J. This case is an appeal from an amended judgment (“the judgment”) entered by the circuit court after its review of the decision of an administrative agency under the Missouri Administrative Procedure Act (“MAPA”). See section 536.010 et. seq.1 The issue in dispute is the appropriate calculation of retirement benefits due certain Joplin firefight
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Harrispublic domain
DON E. BURRELL, J. David Harris (“Buyer”) appeals the deficiency judgment awarded against him after a bench trial in favor of Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC (“Assignee”) on its claim that Buyer breached his automobile purchase agreement. Buyer’s single, multifarious point claims the trial court erred in finding that Assignee satisfied its burden of proof because Assignee failed to properly authenticate “certain business record
Burrell v. Cummins Great Plains, Inc.public domain
324 F.Supp.2d 1000 (2004) David BURRELL, Plaintiff, v. CUMMINS GREAT PLAINS, INC., Defendant. No. 4:03-CV-40355. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. July 7, 2004. *1001 *1002 Thomas M. Werner, Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff. Lora L. McCollom, Gonzalez Saggio &