⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

7 opinions for “Louis Engel, III and Joanna Engel”

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2022-03-23 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 03/22/2022 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:20:03 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014-03-11 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR HENRY FRAZIER, ) No. ED99517 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) the City of St. Louis vs. )
North Carolina Business Court · 2019-12-06 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NCBC 73
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC v. AG Ins. SA/NV, 2019 NCBC 73. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 17 CVS 5594 DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC and DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON JOINING DEFENDANTS’ A
Frazier v. Statepublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014-03-11 · Published · cited 2× · 431 S.W.3d 486; 2014 WL 930846; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 267
Introduction Patricia L. Cohen, Judge. Henry Frazier (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evi-dentiary hearing. Movant claims that the motion court erred in denying his claims that: (1) trial counsel and appellate counsel were ineffective because they failed to withdraw due to a conflict of
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2017-08-17 · Published · cited 13× · 133 Fed. Cl. 568; 2017 WL 3530125
OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge. This rails-to-trails takings class action is in a very unusual, perhaps even unique, procedural posture. A total of 520 class members brought claims. After resolution of a number of motions for partial summary judgment, 1 extensive discovery, and lengthy, detailed s
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2017-05-04 · Published · cited 1× · 131 Fed. Cl. 628; 2017 U.S. Claims LEXIS 445; 2017 WL 1739208
Rails-to-trails class action; settlement; appeal of approval of settlement agreement; remand; application of the mandate rule to remanded case; enforceability of settlement agreement as binding contract OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge. This rails-to-trails class action concerns land previously held as a right-of-way by Burlington
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi