Cases

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

[Cite as Dueck v. Clifton Club Co., 2017-Ohio-7161.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 103868 and 103888 ARTHUR P. DUECK, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS

150 Ariz. 27 (1986) 721 P.2d 1154 Colin N. BEALS and Jean Beals, husband and wife; Cheryl B. Larkey, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. STATE of Arizona, Arizona Game & Fish Department, Defendant/Appellee. T.C. PEARSON and Betty Pearson, husband and wife; Jose Abrigo and Estella Abrigo, husband and wife; Luella Albrecht, individually; William Amator, individually; Albert Andrews and Regina Andrews, husband and wife; Donald Arms

OAKES, Chief Judge: BACKGROUND From the 1930’s through 1966, thousands of workers at the New York Naval Shipyard, commonly known as the Brooklyn Navy Yard (BNY), breathed air laden with carcinogenic asbestos fibers. Manufacturers of the asbestos-containing products used at BNY did not warn users of the hazards posed by asbestos dust. Nor did the Navy war

OPINION HOWARD, Presiding Judge. This is an appeal from the granting of a summary judgment. The issue here is whether the defendant can be held liable for damages caused by Gila River waters diverted from the river by salt cedar and other natural growth. We hold that it cannot and affirm. We consider the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs. Gibraltar Escrow Company v. Thom

OPINION YOCK, Judge. These consolidated civilian pay cases1 are before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss one claim of certain plaintiffs on collateral estoppel grounds and on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on the plaintiffs’ seven claims.2 For the reasons stated below, the defendant’s motion to dismiss one claim of 227

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di

Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department

270 F.3d 203 (5th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.TIMOTHY JOE EMERSON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 99-10331 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS,FIFTH CIRCUIT October 16, 2001Revised November 2, 2001 [Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Ma