Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
8 opinions for “Louis Hinote”
D.F.S. Construction Co. v. Couse Corp.public domain
PER CURIAM. We reverse and remand. The trial court erred in dismissing the complaint with prejudice as the allegations and attached documents, taken together, were sufficient to state a cause of action. See Hinote v. Brigman, 44 Fla. 589, 33 So. 303 (1902); Delta Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. McDevitt & Street Company, 262 So.2d 226 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972); and Edward L. Nezelek, Inc. v. Southern Bell Te
Monahan v. Holmespublic domain
139 F.Supp.2d 253 (2001) Thomas A. MONAHAN, Plaintiff/Petitioner, v. Babette HOLMES, Defendant/Respondent. No. Civ. 3:00CV1058(GLG). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. March 30, 2001. *254 *255 OPINION GOETTEL, District Judge. Plaintiff/Petitioner Th
In Re Mushroom Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
621 F.Supp.2d 274 (2008) In Re MUSHROOM DIRECT PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: All Actions. Master File No. 06-0620. Nos. 06-0638, 06-0657, 06-0677, 06-0861, 06-0932, 06-1464, 06-1854. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 26, 2009. *275 Adam M. Moskowitz, Thomas A. Tucker Ronzetti, Kozyak T
In Re Texaspublic domain
110 F.Supp.2d 514 (2000) In re the State of TEXAS. No. 5:00 CV 118. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Texarkana Division. August 15, 2000. *515 William Andrew Taylor, Attorney General Office, Austin, TX, for State of Texas. David Grant Kaiser, Kaiser & Morrison, PC, Houston, TX, Michael E. Tigar, Jane Blanksteen Tigar,
889 P.2d 646 (1995) Edwin T. VIKMAN and Duane Vikman, Petitioners, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 1269, an Unincorporated Association, Respondent. No. 93SC73. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. January 30, 1995. Rehearing Denied February 21, 1995. *648 Sherman & Howard, J
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HERBERT F. MURRAY, District Judge. Collection agents for the National Electrical Industry Fund (NEIF) have brought these contract actions to recover monies various electrical contractors allegedly owe the fund, pursuant to certain labor agreements with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW). Similar collection cases have been brought in other courts throughout the co
Reed v. State of Floridapublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 34 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 35 These two plaintiffs in error, together with two women defendants, were jointly indicted by the grand jury at a special term of
W. T. Grant Co. v. Jaegerpublic domain
Mr. Presiding Justice Higbee delivered the opinion' of the court. This suit is an action of forcible detainer brought by appellant, W. T. Grant Company, a Massachusetts corporation, before a justice of the peace against appellees, Henry J. Jaeger, Leader House Furnishing Company, and Bast St. Louis House Furnishing Company, on the 14th day of May, 1920, to recover possession